Category: National
Partido Comunista rechaza maniobras militares en Puerto Rico
| March 14, 2015 | 7:59 pm | International, Latin America, National, Party Voices, political struggle | Comments closed

  • El Partido Comunista de Puerto Rico rechaza la presencia militar de EE.UU. en la isla caribeña.

    El Partido Comunista de Puerto Rico rechaza la presencia militar de EE.UU. en la isla caribeña. | Foto: EFE

Publicado 13 marzo 2015 (Hace 21 horas 38 minutos)

La organización comunista asegura que esas maniobras responden a un ensayo para luego imponer el orden militar cuando se desplome el poder colonial impuesto por Estados Unidos en Puerto Rico.

El Partido Comunista de Puerto Rico (PCPR) rechazó este viernes los ejercicios militares que realizará la próxima semana la Guardia Nacional con la presencia de soldados estadounidenses.

A través de un comunicado, la organización comunista lamentó que Puerto Rico sea utilizado como el centro de entrenamientos militares de Estados Unidos.

“Resulta inexplicable, desde la perspectiva humanitaria, que se militarice a Puerto Rico ante eventuales catástrofes naturales, cuando la respuesta del Estado (federal y colonial) debería ser simulacros de las agencias encargadas de protección y socorro de la población”, subraya la comunicación.

El PCPR lamentó que la denominada Operación Respuesta Borinqueña conformada por soldados puertorriqueños y unos mil efectivos de los estados de Nebraska, Vermont, West Virginia y Washington sean enviados a realizar esas actividades en vez de promover la paz y la integración entre los pueblos.

Asimismo, el partido advirtió que estos ejercicios que se realizarán en San Juan (capital de Puerto Rico) y otros municipios del país caribeño responden a las recientes amenazas del presidente estadounidense Barack Obama contra Venezuela.

“Los ejercicios se realizan como parte de la política norteamericana de usar a Puerto Rico como plataforma de lanzamientos de agresiones militares contra los gobiernos de Latinoamérica”, añade el texto firmado por la dirección del PCPR.

Response to “EU Parliamentarians Join US-Led Aggressions on Venezuela”
| March 13, 2015 | 10:22 pm | Analysis, Imperialism, International, National, political struggle, Venezuela | Comments closed
By A. Shaw
The slave states of Europe (the “EU”) bow once again to their supreme imperialist master state, the bourgeois regime in the USA.
The aim of the latest EU and US scheme is to isolate Venezuela.
The pretext for this scheme is the dirty EU and US lie that Venezuela is not a democracy, because democracy is a form of  state in which elected representatives exercise state power in accordance with the rule of law.
The lying EU and the US regime maintain that Venezuela doesn’t respect rule of law.
The  elected liars of the EU and the USA claim Venezuela doesn’t respect the the rule of law when it stops protests and arrests leaders of the protesters.
For more than year, Latin America  and the Caribbean and much of North America and Europe  watched the protests in Venezuela, sometimes live on Telesur TV.
The protesters  burned buses and health centers, stopped children from attending school, prevented sick people from getting to hospitals, and murdered people who tried to clear barricades so that they could go to work or wherever they chose to go.
The lying EU referred to such actions by these protesters as “peaceful,” thus, such actions are permitted by the rule of law as the right of assembly of the protesters and the right of freedom of expression of the protesters.
How do the lying leaders of the aggressively imperialistic US regime and vile slave states of the EU believe they can get away with their huge, obvious, and dirty lies about Venezuela?
The big bourgeois media – or, better named, “the lying cappie press” — is on the side of lies and liars.
About a third of the US people are crackpot fascists and degenerate reactionaries, the preferred prey of the big bourgeois media. The size to the reactionary sector of the European population is more difficult to estimate.
Whatever story the big bourgeois media covers prominently and continuously is presumed by crackpots to be real. So, to the US crackpots, reality is nothing but continuous prominence in the lying cappie press. If a story has less prominence than another story, then the former has less reality than the latter.
The two-faced regimes in North America (USA and Canada) and most of Europe are confident that their lies will be more prominently and more continuously covered than the facts in the big bourgeois media .
The regimes in USA and Europe are indeed bourgeois democracies, but the government of Venezuela is presently also a bourgeois democracy.
The late Hugo Chavez himself used to call the Venezuelan Government a  “bourgeois state.”
But the bourgeois democracy in Venezuela is a peculiar bourgeois state in which a proletarian democracy is emerging. Bourgeois democracy is giving birth to a glorious proletarian democracy.
The slimy leaders of the USA and EU ordered the Venezuela people, state, and party to abort the emerging proletarian democracy.
The Venezuelan people, state, and party refuse to abort proletarian democracy.
The Obama regime argues that Venezuela occupies USA’s “backyard.” Therefore, Venezuela, like all other Latin American and Caribbean states, is bereft of sovereignty. Without sovereignty, Venezuela lacks standing to refuse to abort the emerging proletarian democracy.
EU Parliamentarians Join US-Led Aggressions on Venezuela
| March 13, 2015 | 10:16 pm | Analysis, International, National, political struggle, Venezuela | Comments closed

  • Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro recently condemned the "aggressions" against Venezuela.

    Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro recently condemned the “aggressions” against Venezuela. | Photo: teleSUR

Published 12 March 2015
http://www.telesurtv.net/english/news/EU-Parliamentarians-Join-US-Led-Aggressions-on-Venezuela-20150312-0015.html

The European Parliament passed an anti-Venezuela resolution calling for a “delegation to be sent to assess the situation in Venezuela as soon as possible.”

The European Parliament called on Venezuela Thursday to release opposition members the Parliament claims were “arbitrarily detained” during opposition violence that resulted in 43 deaths last year.

The resolution follows a statement by the U.S. on Monday claiming that Venezuelan government authorities posted an “unusual and extraordinary threat to the national security and foreign policy of the United States.” The statement also referred to the arrest of some opposition leaders who encouraged the violence.

In a resolution passed by 384 votes to 75, the European Parliament called on Venezuela’s government to “release all those detained and to end its opposition crackdown.” The Parliament did not call on Venezuela to release security officials who have been arrested for the few deaths they were responsible for, nor did it criticize the human rights violations committed by the opposition leaders, who for 4 months led a campaign to oust democratically-elected President Nicolas Maduro. Right-wing opposition tactics included burning buses and health centers, stopping children from attending school, prohibiting sick people from getting to hospitals, and murdering various people who tried to clear barricades so that they could go to work.

The European Parliament’s statement referred to such actions by the opposition as “peaceful.”

Venezuela’s Ambassador to the EU, Antonio Garcia, told the press that the vote was part of a “broader campaign” against Venezuela and driven by domestic issues in some member states, such as Spain. Recent polls suggest Spain’s Podemos could win upcoming elections with similar anti-austerity politics which brought the left-wing Syriza party to power in Greece in January.

“It is not a secret to anyone that Venezuela is being used in Spain’s internal politics,” Garcia said.

The leader of Podemos, Pablo Iglesias told the press Thursday that he didn’t support the U.S. sanctions and aggressions and said that “dialogue” was a better way to solve “international problems.”

Garcia noted that last time the U.S. imposed sanctions on Venezuelan officials, on Dec. 18, the European Parliament also voted on a resolution against Venezuela. He noted that the same thing has happened again and argued that the U.S. executive order was a “very serious attack on Venezuelan sovereignty.”

RELATED: US Agression against Venezuela 

Response to “Bernie Sanders: GOP ‘itching’ for war with Iran”
| March 10, 2015 | 8:01 pm | Analysis, Bernie Sanders, International, National, political struggle | Comments closed
By A. Shaw
U.S. reactionaries and lunatics, congregating in the GOP as well as the DP, are indeed “itching” to commit aggression against some country that U.S. imperialists hasn’t attacked recently.
These disgusting crackpots don’t care whether the next victim of US aggression is Iran in the Middle East or Russia in Europe or Venezuela in Latin America or China in the Far East or some other country.
Their itch vociferously demands a scratch.
But at the moment, these reactionary US rats, the personification of inhumanity on earth, seem to mildly prefer a huge genocide against the Iranian people who are falsely accused by these rats of making or trying to make an atom bomb.
These reactionaries, the conservative scum of the US people who constitute about a third of US population, suffer from extreme bloodthirstiness. Thus, these blood fiends cannot go for long without killing millions of people as the scum has recently done in Iraq.
These bloodthirsty lunatics  –   most are GOPs —  extol the mass murder of innocent people as their highest and finest virtue, their supreme good. The slaughter of tens of thousands of innocent people in a brief moment excites a feeling of “shock and awe” in these savages. This feeling of shock and awe is a kind of rapture peculiar to these animals.
Next to mass murder, telling lies is their most cherished virtue. They hold up as the world’s greatest masterpiece in telling lies, the false story about “weapons of mass destruction” in Iraq. After US reactionaries under the leadership of George W. Bush attacked, occupied, and produced over a million war-related Iraqi fatalities between March 2003 and September 2007, the lying reactionary US president G.W. Bush confessed “We can’t find no weapons of mass destruction here in Iraq. We’ve looked but we can’t find any. Maybe, just maybe, we erred or something.”
Degenerate U.S. reactionaries love to combine a shameless confession of their crimes and, at the same time, a utterly vain boast about their crimes.
Again, today, the degenerate liars that infest the rightwing of U.S. politics are shouting “Listen here, Iran has an atomic bomb or is trying to get one. Let’s get Iran before Iran gets one.”
Both the executive and legislative branches of the bourgeois democratic regime in Washington, D.C., know conclusively that Iran doesn’t have and isn’t trying to get an atom bomb.
But it’s impossible for the perverse to resist a lie as big and as juicy as this lie, repeated daily by the bourgeois media against Iran.
No doubt, after U.S. blood fiends slaughter at least a million Iranians, the fiends will confess “We can’t find no atom bomb or evidence that Iran was trying to make one. Maybe we erred again or something. We’re sorry about that.”
Now, the State of Israel is pushing the slimy U.S. conservatives toward war with Iran and these slimy U.S. conservatives are pushing Obama toward war with Iran. So, Israel pushes Obama toward war with Iran.
But Obama doesn’t like to be pushed around by either Israelis or U.S. reactionaries.
The question is: Can Obama resist this pushing like a U.S. patriot until his term expires in January 2016
Obama knows he’s asking U.S. conservatives, both their leaders and their base, to go a very long time without enjoying a holocaust.
Sniffing blood, most U.S. conservatives are already scratching themselves like monkeys.
Bernie Sanders: GOP ‘itching’ for war with Iran
| March 10, 2015 | 7:55 pm | Analysis, Bernie Sanders, International, National, political struggle | Comments closed

 

By Jonathan Topaz

3/10/15 10:31 AM EDT

Sen. Bernie Sanders on Tuesday slammed Senate Republicans for their open letter to Iranian leaders, accusing them of seeking out a war with the country.

Speaking with a group of reporters following his speech at the International Association of Fire Fighters presidential forum in Washington, the Vermont senator said the 47 Republican senators warning Iran of a deal on its nuclear program are trying to “sabotage” a agreement.

Story Continued Below

“[M]y Republican friends seem to be itching for that war,” said Sanders, an independent who is openly considering a presidential bid as a Democrat. “When you sabotage the effort to reach a peace agreement by the leader of the United States of America — the man who is charged with dealing with foreign policy — that, to me, is really unspeakable.”

Sanders, one of the Senate’s leading liberal voices and former chairman of the Senate Veterans’ Affairs Committee, detailed what he called the significant cost in lives and dollars of the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan. “Apparently, some of my Republican colleagues do not believe that two wars are enough,” he said, later adding: “I think that is a very, very tragic position to hold.”

Also on POLITICO

Iran slams Cotton letter: ‘Undiplomatic’

NICK GASS

The senator offered praise for President Barack Obama and international negotiators that have long been pursuing a deal to freeze Iran’s nuclear program, calling the negotiations “the right thing to do.”

A group of 47 GOP senators, led by Arkansas Sen. Tom Cotton, sent an open letter on Monday to the leaders of Iran, cautioning them against reaching an agreement with the U.S. on its nuclear program. The senators wrote that an agreement without congressional approval would be “a mere executive agreement” and noted that the next president could overturn a deal when Obama leaves office.

Four potential 2016 GOP hopefuls — Sens. Marco Rubio of Florida, Rand Paul of Kentucky, Ted Cruz of Texas and Lindsey Graham of South Carolina — all signed the letter.

The White House and several congressional Republicans and Democrats have criticized the letter as an attempt to politicize the issue and purposefully derail the president’s foreign policy goals.

Asked whether he would urge his Democratic colleagues to continue to support the president on a potential deal if negotiators fail to agree by the March 24 deadline, Sanders said: “The devil is in the details. We’ll have to see what happens. But I think what the American people want, what I certainly want, is to do everything that we can to reach a peaceful agreement with Iran.”

Sanders hailed the importance of trade unions in his speech on Tuesday morning and also took a shot at Wisconsin Gov. Scott Walker, a potential GOP presidential candidate, for signing right-to-work legislation in his state.

Also on POLITICO

Cotton fires back at Biden over Iran letter

KENDALL BREITMAN

“The goal is that if you can disempower working families, it is easier to continue to push them down, it is easier to prevent them from organizing politically, and that is what’s going on,” Sanders said, aligning the legislation with corporate America. “That is an intrinsic part of the war against working families today, is to break unions, and that’s what Gov. Walker and his friends are about.”

The senator’s address — the first on a day that will include speeches from other potential Democratic presidential candidates former Sen. Jim Webb of Virginia and former Gov. Martin O’Malley of Maryland — struck familiar tones for Sanders, as he railed against “the billionaire class” and called for a grassroots coalition for a working-class agenda.

“Maybe, just maybe, it’s time for corporate America and the wealthiest people in this country to start paying their fair share of taxes,” he said in one of his loudest applause lines.

Sanders has visited early nominating states New Hampshire and Iowa several times in recent months, most recently a three-day, nine-event visit to the Hawkeye State last month.

The senator, who has recently expressed frustration with repeated questions about his potential 2016 rival, likely frontrunner Hillary Clinton, declined twice to comment on her email scandal.

“I really don’t want to talk about Hillary Clinton,” he said, when asked about her upcoming press conference Tuesday where she is expected to discuss her use of a private email account used to conduct business while she headed the State Department.

At a speech and Q&A at Washington’s National Press Club on Monday, Sanders said he had received no constituent phone calls about the emails and that it’s “not one of the big issues” he’s focused on.

A Sanders adviser said Monday that the Vermonter is likely to make a preliminary decision on a 2016 run this month.

Authors:

Jonathan Topaz

jtopaz@politico.com

@JonathanTopaz

Read more: http://www.politico.com/story/2015/03/bernie-sanders-iran-letter-war-115934.html#ixzz3U29e2cu1

A Make-Believe Interview with Walt Whitman
| March 9, 2015 | 7:55 pm | Analysis, National, political struggle | Comments closed

 – from Zoltan Zigedy is available at:
http://zzs-blg.blogspot.com/

Walt Whitman is thought by some to be the US’s greatest poet, certainly the most acclaimed expression of the nation’s better spirit. What follows is a fictional interview with Whitman, with the quotes drawn from his 1871 Democratic Vistas (http://xroads.virginia.edu/~hyper/whitman/vistas/vistas.html). Obviously liberty is taken with the context, though not with the text.

 

Mr. Whitman, would you care to comment on the current state of affairs existing in the US?
I say we had best look our times and lands searchingly in the face, like a physician diagnosing some deep disease. Never was there, perhaps, more hollowness at heart than at present, and here in the United States. Genuine belief seems to have left us. The underlying principles of the States are not honestly believ’d in, (for all this hectic glow, and these melodramatic screamings,) nor is humanity itself believ’d in. What penetrating eye does not everywhere see through the mask? The spectacle is appaling. We live in an atmosphere of hypocrisy throughout.
What, in your opinion, stands behind the “hollowness at heart”?
From deceit in the spirit, the mother of all false deeds, the offspring is already incalculable. An acute and candid person, in the revenue department in Washington, who is led by the course of his employment to regularly visit the cities, north, south and west, to investigate frauds, has talk’d much with me about his discoveries. The depravity of the business classes of our country is not less than has been supposed, but infinitely greater. The official services of America, national, state, and municipal, in all their branches and departments, except the judiciary, are saturated in corruption, bribery, falsehood, mal-administration; and the judiciary is tainted. The great cities reek with respectable as much as non-respectable robbery and scoundrelism. In fashionable life, flippancy, tepid amours, weak infidelism, small aims, or no aims at all, only to kill time. In business, (this all-devouring modern word, business,) the one sole object is, by any means, pecuniary gain. The magician’s serpent in the fable ate up all the other serpents; and money-making is our magician’s serpent, remaining to-day sole master of the field.
Our country seems bent on expanding its influence far and wide, imposing its will on others. How do you view this?
I say that our New World democracy, however great a success in uplifting the masses out of their sloughs, in materialistic development, products, and in a certain highly-deceptive superficial popular intellectuality, is, so far, an almost complete failure in its social aspects, and in really grand religious, moral, literary, and esthetic results. In vain do we march with unprecedented strides to empire so colossal, outvying the antique, beyond Alexander’s, beyond the proudest sway of Rome. In vain have we annex’d Texas, California, Alaska, and reach north for Canada and south for Cuba. It is as if we were somehow being endow’d with a vast and more and more thoroughly-appointed body, and then left with little or no soul.
And your vision for the US?
The true gravitation-hold of liberalism in the United States will be a more universal ownership of property, general homesteads, general comfort — a vast, intertwining reticulation of wealth. As the human frame, or, indeed, any object in this manifold universe, is best kept together by the simple miracle of its own cohesion, and the necessity, exercise and profit thereof, so a great and varied nationality, occupying millions of square miles, were firmest held and knit by the principle of the safety and endurance of the aggregate of its middling property owners.
But surely other writers and thinkers share your vision of more “universal ownership” and the “safety and endurance of the aggregate”…
But at present, (judged by any higher scale than that which finds the chief ends of existence to be to feverishly make money during one-half of it, and by some “amusement,” or perhaps foreign travel, flippantly kill time, the other half,) and consider’d with reference to purposes of patriotism, health, a noble personality, religion, and the democratic adjustments, all these swarms of poems, literary magazines, dramatic plays, resultant so far from American intellect, and the formation of our best ideas, are useless and a mockery. They strengthen and nourish no one, express nothing characteristic, give decision and purpose to no one, and suffice only the lowest level of vacant minds.
Is your vision attainable? Can it be more than a vista?
It is to the development, identification, and general prevalence of that fervid comradeship, (the adhesive love, at least rivaling the amative love hitherto possessing imaginative literature, if not going beyond it,) that I look for the counterbalance and offset of our materialistic and vulgar American democracy, and for the spiritualization thereof. Many will say it is a dream, and will not follow my inferences: but I confidently expect a time when there will be seen, running like a half-hid warp through all the myriad audible and visible worldly interests of America, threads of manly friendship, fond and loving, pure and sweet, strong and life-long, carried to degrees hitherto unknown — not only giving tone to individual character, and making it unprecedently emotional, muscular, heroic, and refined, but having the deepest relations to general politics. I say democracy infers such loving comradeship, as its most inevitable twin or counterpart, without which it will be incomplete, in vain, and incapable of perpetuating itself.
But the people do not seem attuned to your vision. They seem absorbed in other matters. Do you envision a change of disposition?
It really seems to me the condition, not only of our future national and democratic development, but of our perpetuation. In the highly artificial and materialistic bases of modern civilization, with the corresponding arrangements and methods of living, the force-infusion of intellect alone, the depraving influences of riches just as much as poverty, the absence of all high ideals in character — with the long series of tendencies, shapings, which few are strong enough to resist, and which now seem, with steam-engine speed, to be everywhere turning out the generations of humanity like uniform iron castings — all of which, as compared with the feudal ages, we can yet do nothing better than accept, make the best of, and even welcome, upon the whole, for their oceanic practical grandeur, and their restless wholesale kneading of the masses — I say of all this tremendous and dominant play of solely materialistic bearings upon current life in the United States, with the results as already seen, accumulating, and reaching far into the future, that they must either be confronted and met by at least an equally subtle and tremendous force-infusion for purposes of spiritualization, for the pure conscience, for genuine esthetics, and for absolute and primal manliness and womanliness — or else our modern civilization, with all its improvements, is in vain, and we are on the road to a destiny, a status, equivalent, in its real world, to that of the fabled damned.
You seem wary of destiny, empire, and indifference to a common identity.
Even to-day, amid these whirls, incredible flippancy, and blind fury of parties, infidelity, entire lack of first-class captains and leaders, added to the plentiful meanness and vulgarity of the ostensible masses — that problem, the labor question, beginning to open like a yawning gulf, rapidly widening every year — what prospect have we? We sail a dangerous sea of seething currents, cross and under-currents, vortices — all so dark, untried — and whither shall we turn? It seems as if the Almighty had spread before this nation charts of imperial destinies, dazzling as the sun, yet with many a deep intestine difficulty, and human aggregate of cankerous imperfection, — saying, lo! the roads, the only plans of development, long and varied with all terrible balks and ebullitions. You said in your soul, I will be empire of empires, overshadowing all else, past and present, putting the history of old-world dynasties, conquests behind me, as of no account — making a new history, a history of democracy, making old history a dwarf — I alone inaugurating largeness, culminating time. If these, O lands of America, are indeed the prizes, the determinations of your soul, be it so. But behold the cost, and already specimens of the cost. Thought you greatness was to ripen for you like a pear? If you would have greatness, know that you must conquer it through ages, centuries — must pay for it with a proportionate price. For you too, as for all lands, the struggle, the traitor, the wily person in office, scrofulous wealth, the surfeit of prosperity, the demonism of greed, the hell of passion, the decay of faith, the long postponement, the fossil-like lethargy, the ceaseless need of revolutions, prophets, thunderstorms, deaths, births, new projections and invigorations of ideas and men.
So you fear arrogance and locate greatness in humane values and a renewal of ideas. Does not our electoral system, our system of checks and balances give us some guarantee that we will not succumb to willful arrogance and ensure the emergence of new ideas?
Did you, too, O friend, suppose democracy was only for elections, for politics, and for a party name? I say democracy is only of use there that it may pass on and come to its flower and fruits in manners, in the highest forms of interaction between men, and their beliefs — in religion, literature, colleges, and schools — democracy in all public and private life… I have intimated that, as a paramount scheme, it has yet few or no full realizers and believers. I do not see, either, that it owes any serious thanks to noted propagandists or champions, or has been essentially help’d, though often harm’d, by them. It has been and is carried on by all the moral forces, and by trade, finance, machinery, intercommunications, and, in fact, by all the developments of history, and can no more be stopp’d than the tides, or the earth in its orbit. Doubtless, also, it resides, crude and latent, well down in the hearts of the fair average of the American-born people, mainly in the agricultural regions. But it is not yet, there or anywhere, the fully-receiv’d, the fervid, the absolute faith.
So you think…
For America, type of progress, and of essential faith in man, above all his errors and wickedness — few suspect how deep, how deep it really strikes. The world evidently supposes, and we have evidently supposed so too, that the States are merely to achieve the equal franchise, an elective government — to inaugurate the respectability of labor, and become a nation of practical operatives, law-abiding, orderly and well off. Yes, those are indeed parts of the task of America; but they not only do not exhaust the progressive conception, but rather arise, teeming with it, as the mediums of deeper, higher progress.
Do you find this progress embedded in those steering the ship of state, directing our institutions, or commanding our economy?
The best class we show, is but a mob of fashionably dress’d speculators and vulgarians. True, indeed, behind this fantastic farce, enacted on the visible stage of society, solid things and stupendous labors are to be discover’d, existing crudely and going on in the background, to advance and tell themselves in time. Yet the truths are none the less terrible.
Is it possible that a better world lies ahead? Perhaps one more democratic and– in your words– a world with “a vast, intertwining reticulation of wealth”?
We see, as in the universes of the material kosmos, after meteorological, vegetable, and animal cycles, man at last arises, born through them, to prove them, concentrate them, to turn upon them with wonder and love — to command them, adorn them, and carry them upward into superior realms — so, out of the series of the preceding social and political universes, now arise these States. We see that while many were supposing things established and completed, really the grandest things always remain; and discover that the work of the New World is not ended, but only fairly begun.
******************
Whitman’s Democratic Vistas is a collection of rambling, often disjointed observations about the US and democracy made nearly a century and a half ago. While it hopes for future progress toward noble goals, it well anticipates a process of decay, democratic erosion, and the ill-effects of “the demonism of greed” fostered by “business.”
His expression of mindless conformity– “generations of humanity like uniform iron castings”– is a memorable turn-of-phrase. His term “scrofulous wealth” leaves little doubt of his contempt for accumulation. And the wonderful words “hollowness of heart” are arguably a counterpart to the idea of “alienation.”
Is there any doubt that “universal ownership” and “safety and endurance of the aggregate” count as an approach toward the idea of socialism?
Yes, the interview is fake. Yes, it rips quotes out of context. But it highlights thoughts that demonstrate the unfortunate continuity of US decadence, the course of a young nation traveling on the rails of capitalism. Whitman’s fears have been unfortunately exceeded today.
Zoltan Zigedy


Posted By zoltan zigedy to ZZ’s blog at 3/09/2015 03:08:00 PM

American war machine ramping up for revenge
| March 8, 2015 | 6:36 pm | Analysis, International, National, political struggle | Comments closed
http://english.pravda.ru/opinion/columnists/24-02-2015/129893-american_war_machine-0/

http://nymetrocommunistparty.org/?p=885

24.02.2015
American war machine ramping up for revenge. 54627.jpeg

U.S. Media Role is to Pacify the Nation

by John Stanton

“The most effectual engines for pacifying a nation are the public papers… A despotic government always keeps a kind of standing army of news-writers who, without any regard to truth or to what should be like truth, invent and put into the papers whatever might serve the ministers. This suffices with the mass of the people who have no means of distinguishing the false from the true paragraphs of a newspaper.”  Thomas Jefferson

Freedom of the press is another of the principal slogans of pure democracy…The capitalists have always use the term freedom to mean freedom for the rich to get richer and for the workers to starve to death. In capitalist usage freedom of the press means freedom of the rich to bribe the press and freedom to use their wealth to shape and fabricate so-called public opinion. In this respect, too, the defenders of pure democracy prove to be defenders of an utterly foul and venal system that gives the rich control over the mass media. They prove to be deceivers of the people, who, with the aid of plausible, fine-sounding, but thoroughly false phrases, divert them from the concrete historical task of liberating the press from capitalist enslavement…” V.I. Lenin

According to Stars & Stripes, United States Air Force Captain William Dubois-30 years old–was killed when the F-16 he was piloting on a mission against the Islamic State crashed. Marine Lance Cpl. Sean Neal, 19, of Riverside, California died in Iraq from a noncombat related injury. Marine Cpl. Jordan Spears, 21, of Memphis, Ind., was lost at sea while conducting flight operations in the North Arabian Gulf.

Does anyone care or even notice?

These deaths were part of Operation Inherent Resolve, the American military operation designed to eliminate the Islamic Caliphate and the Syrian government run by Bashar Assad. Operation Inherent Resolve is a minor sub-plot in the grand opera/geo-strategy of the United States of America. The final act of the geopolitical opera envisioned by the grand brains of the United States is to either contain or destabilize Russia and China, and corral the lesser BRICS (Brazil, India, and South Africa).

Over the past two decades the United States and Western Europe have been burned badly by the shoddy thinking of its strategists, economists, financiers, policy makers, politicians, academicians and military leaders.

They chose to sacrifice trillions of dollars (US) in treasure and millions of lives (soldiers, civilians killed, wounded, displaced) only to lose the wars in Iraq, Afghanistan, Syria, and Libya. They have created chaos in the Middle East/Persian Gulf apparently by design.

They stood idly by while Palestinian children were slaughtered by Israel. They clapped quietly as a military coup was undertaken in Egypt that restored the dictatorial status quo there meaning arms transfers and military cooperation could return to normal.

The Americans and West Europeans incited revolution in Ukraine and looked the other way as Nazi’s brazenly assisted in the overthrow of a democratically elected government there. When Russia balked and smartly seized Crimea the Americans and Europeans were embarrassingly out maneuvered. When China allowed Edward Snowden (NSA whistleblower) to leave Hong Kong and Russia decided to allow him to stay in Russia, the Americans and Europeans were aghast at knowing they were, once again outmatched.

Further, the dunderheads in America and Western Europe finally succeeded in bringing an old Cold War nightmare to reality: their self-aggrandizing actions caused Russia and China to embrace in the form of economic and military trade deals that cut out the United States and Europe. Once again Russia has bested the Americans and Western Europeans by ditching the South Stream pipeline in favor of a pipeline to Turkey leaving Southern Europe in energy jeopardy.

Revenge!

In the cities and towns of the United States and Western Europe citizens are on edge about matters of life-security: employment, food, shelter, clothing, health insurance, education. Millions are unemployed or just culled from the statistical tables, forgotten. Children are going hungry. Immigrants are feeling the brunt of national anxiety/jingoism as they always do before street violence and war take place.

Class warfare is visible from the streets of Ferguson, Missouri to Detroit, Michigan. The classic hit song “Monster” by Steppenwolf sums it up “The cities have turned into jungles and corruption is strangling’ the land. The police force is watching the people and the people just can’t understand. We don’t know how to mind our own business ’cause the whole world’s got to be just like us. Now we are fighting a war over there, no matter who’s the winner we can’t pay the cost.” The United States of America can’t even field a high speed bullet train.

Only a global economic and kinetic war is going to satiate the hunger for revenge that the top echelons of American and Western European leadership currently display.

American President Obama will initiate the big war and President Jeb Bush will accelerate it. During the American presidential election all citizens will agree that the big war for American dominance is a given and not up for debate. The flood gates of cash will be opened by the US Congress even as social security and safety net benefits are slashed. It has all been decided in advance.

And now’s the time for war. Who is going to cover the war for the masses? How will anyone really know what’s going on?

Is it not genius that the media that would have provided the public with war news has been crippled through the prosecution and intimidation of journalists like James Risen, or of whistleblowers like John Kiriakou languishing in a federal prison? Then there is the collusion between the American government and media concerns like the New York Times which makes determining what is propaganda and actionable news difficult. The world knows that the US government, through the National Security Agency, is listening in: Those who might lead antiwar rebellions, or write contrarian reports, can be tracked and eliminated.

According to the Pew Research Journalism Project 25 percent of the 952 local television stations in the United States do not produce their own news products relying instead on contractors or sharing arrangements with third parties. Newsroom reductions in force continue across most mainstream media brands which–in spite of the hype over niche news outlets like Buzzfeed, Mashable, Politico, Vice News and Vox–still produce the bulk of the news products that Americans feed off of. And mainstream media continues to cut its news sectors. According to the Pew Research Journalism Project, “Full-time professional newsroom employment declined another 6.4% in 2012 with more losses expected for 2013. Gannett alone is estimated to have cut 400 newspaper jobs while the Tribune Co. announced 700 (not all of them in the newsroom).”

A clear and present danger to the reading, listening and seeing public is the growth of sponsored/biased journalism masking as news. Native advertising is a multibillion dollar industry and growing. Nearly every news organization in the United States is in on the game in which requiring journalists/reporters write with the sponsor/advertiser in mind, not the public and national interest.

Custom Propaganda

According to the Pew Research Journalism Project “the overlap between public relations and news noted in last year’s State of the News Media report became even more pronounced. One of the greatest areas of revenue experimentation now involves website content that is paid for by commercial advertisers – but often written by journalists on staff – and placed on a news publishers’ page in a way that sometimes makes it indistinguishable from a news story. Following the lead of early adapters like The Atlantic and Mashable, native advertising, as it is called by the industry, caught on rapidly in 2013. The New York Times, The Washington Post and most recently The Wall Street Journal have now begun or announced plans to begin devoting staff to this kind of advertising, often as a part of a new “custom content division.” eMarketer predicts that native ads spending will reach $2.85 billion by 2014. Many of these publishers initially expressed caution over such ads, with Wall Street Journal editor-in-chief Gerard Baker even describing it as a “Faustian pact.” In the end, though, many publishers eventually came down with a conclusion similar to Baker’s, who said that he was  “confident that our readers will appreciate what is sponsor-generated content and what is content from our global staff,” according to a statement released by The Journal. That may be the case, and it could also be the case that stories created for and paid for by advertisers do not bother consumers as long as they are a good read. At this point, though, there is little if any public data that speak to consumer response one way or the other.”

A similar model has long been in operation with heavyweight think tanks like the Brookings Institution who receive funding from foreign sources/sponsors to, ultimately, influence policy makers in Washington, DC. Once again the notorious non-profit NGO’s reveal their true colors: “Show us the money and we’ll justify anything!

Perhaps the day will come when the pundits, journalists, think tank mavens, and retired war machine veterans will be required to dress like NASCAR or Formula One race car drivers whose clothing is littered with patches advertising this and that corporation/sponsor.

Mind, Soul and Dreams Owned by Disney, Comcast, Fox, CBS, Pearson

Do you spends hours watching television until you drift into sleep? Do you read a newspaper or magazine during breakfast or lunch? Do you frequent websites that only cater to your ideology? What feeds your mind and creates your identity?

Who, really, are you? It’s an important question to ask yourself.

In the original Total Recall Arnold Schwarzenegger plays a character named Quaid. He thinks that he really is Quaid, a construction worker married to a beautiful wife played by the Sharon Stone. Events transpire that reveal Quaid is really Hauser, a sinister government agent (also played by Schwarzenegger) in collusion with the oppressive Governor Cohaagen of a Mars mining colony. After a violent encounter with Cohaagen’s henchmen, Quaid discovers he has killing skills he was unaware of. A rough and tumble scene with Stone follows and ends with Stone revealing to Quaid: “Your whole life is just a dream…implanted by ‘the agency.'”

Later Quaid comes to find out that he really is Hauser. This revelation comes via Hauser speaking to Quaid from a prerecorded video displayed on a laptop television: “Hauser: Howdy, stranger! This is Hauser. If things have gone wrong, I’m talking to myself and you don’t have a wet towel around your head. Now, whatever your name is, get ready for the big surprise. You are not you, you’re me.”

Here is a sampling of the vertically integrated companies that make you not you, but them: Disney owns ABC News, ESPN, Touchstone Pictures, Marvel Comics, Cruise Lines, Hyperion Books and Reedy Energy Services. Comcast owns NBC Universal, the Philadelphia Flyers, and is attempting to acquire Time Warner Cable. Fox News Corporation owns the Dow Jones & Company (Wall Street Journal, Barron’s, DJX, etc.), Harper Collins Publishers, Move, Inc. (real estate news), 20th Century Fox, Fox News Channel, and Amplify (educational products for K-12). CBS owns Simon & Schuster, CNET, the Smithsonian Network, and 130 radio stations. Time Warner owns CNN, Time magazine, HBO, MAX, Sports Illustrated Kids, and People Magazine. Pearson influences the course of American education through its publishing houses, digital learning platforms, and a 50 percent interest in the Economist Magazine, Penguin Random House and the Financial Times.

Millions of 19, 21 and 30 year olds-civilians and not–are going to going to be killed, maimed, wounded and displaced in the coming years. Try to find out why.

John Stanton

John Stanton is a Virginia based writer. Reach him at captainkong22@gmail.com