By A. Shaw
Marx, Fidel, Engels, Ho, and Lenin all warned us that anarchism assumes many forms.
Here’s one of those forms.
“The sheepdog is a presidential candidate running ostensibly to the left of the establishment Democrat to whom the billionaires will award the nomination. Sheepdogs are herders, and the sheepdog candidate is charged with herding activists and voters back into the Democratic fold who might otherwise drift leftward and outside of the Democratic party, either staying home or trying to build something outside the two party box,”  Bruce A. Dixon, a running dog of imperialism, barks.
The content of Anarchism, present in all of its forms, is abstention from political struggle or other activity that equates with abstention.
SHEEPDOG AND RUNNING DOG
Using the same words, wit, erudition, and gestures, Bernie Sanders does today what he has done for 40 years.
Imperial running dog Bruce A. Dixon doesn’t clarify whether Bernie was a sheepdog during the last 40 years before he became a presidential candidate or whether Bernie during the last 40 years was left or only “ostensibly left.”
If Bernie was a sheepdog 40 years before he became a presidential candidate, then presumably his presidential candidacy has nothing to do with sheepdogging.
If Bernie wasn’t  a sheepdog 40 years before he became a presidential candidate, then  presumably his candidacy alone accounts for these false accusations of sheepdogging.
So what running dog Dixon is really saying is Bernie is an alleged sheepdog solely because Bernie is running against Hillary Clinton.
Thus, Dixon is a running dog of Hillary, a notorious U.S. imperialist.
INTO THE DEMOCRATIC FOLD OR INTO THE ANARCHIST FOLD
  
The running dog says, “the sheepdog candidate is charged with herding activists and voters back into the Democratic fold.”
Dixon, the running dog of imperialism, seems to understand that many liberals and leftists will never campaign or vote for Hillary Clinton. So, realizing he can’t get their vote or support, running dog urges these liberals and leftists not to vote at all or to vote for a candidate who aims to lose.
An example of a candidate who aims to lose is somebody running for a party that is not qualified to be on the presidential ballot in at least half of the states of the USA, thus, making it impossible to win in either popular vote or the votes of the electoral college.
Of all the third parties qualified to be on the presidential ballot somewhere, the Green Party is the most widely qualified.
The Green Party has qualified to be on the ballot in only 21 states and Washington DC.
Running dogs are everywhere today barking “Vote for the candidate who aims to lose.”.
This is anarchist trash.
Bernie however aims to win.
BUILD SOMETHING OUTSIDE THE TWO PARTY BOX
Why wait until a presidential election year to build something outside the two party box.
Get your party that’s outside the box qualified in most or all of the states before the presidential election year.
Stop telling lies and perpetrating electoral fraud of the electorate by saying that candidates who aim to lose and who must lose are winners or going to be winners.