Repost: Commentary: Save the Party
| January 12, 2016 | 9:03 pm | About the CPUSA, political struggle | Comments closed
Commentary: Save the Party
| January 30, 2010 | 4:33 am | Analysis, Party Voices
Tags: ,
http://houstoncommunistparty.com/commentary-save-the-party/

Over the coming days, the Communist Party USA Houston club will be posting discussion documents for the upcoming CPUSA convention. However, the party’s current direction is generating discussion going into the May event. Here we present one viewpoint.

By Dean Christ, Kevin Kyle, and Joan Phillips via Political Affairs

We think the CPUSA convention, postponed several times, cannot come soon enough. We believe the Party has been heading in a wrong direction in far too many ways.

What has happened the Party’s tradition of class struggle, anti-racism, anti-monopoly, anti-imperialism, political independence, international solidarity, and indeed Marxism-Leninism?

Instead of building the Party, the current top leaders (no matter what they think or claim they are doing) have been dismantling the Party piece by piece: eliminating the print versions of the People’s Weekly World and Political Affairs, giving away the Reference Center for Marxist Studies, keeping bookstores shut, abolishing the national Organization Department and several clubs in New York, not to mention cutting YCL funding instead of prioritizing it.

The June 2009 move to end the print edition of the PWW sent shock waves through the Party. Moreover, for top leaders to sweep under the rug the many letters of protest from individuals, clubs, and districts, constituted factionalism and a violation of democracy, for which there should be accountability. With some top officers of the Party now advising against the use of the word “Leninism” as “foreign,” the word “liquidation” used by some comrades seems no longer an exaggeration.

How to Build the Party

While those of us opposed to the current direction may not wholly agree on the way forward, many would agree on the broad outlines:

  • Put the class struggle at the center of our thinking and work. Organize the people’s rage at Wall Street bailouts and mass joblessness by calling for nationalization and democratic control of the banks and basic industry, and by putting the Anti-Monopoly Coalition back at the center of our revolutionary strategy to win socialism.
  • Put forth an anti-crisis program centered on job creation and call attention to the special suffering of youth, immigrants, and African Americans. Work in union rank-and-file movements, building unity, militancy and class-struggle policies.
  • Organize the unemployed into a political force to be reckoned with by the ruling class. We need Unemployed Councils to fight politically for jobs at living wages.
  • Resume our historically second-to-none role as a leading opponent of racism, national oppression and all forms of discrimination, and as an advocate and exemplar of Black-white unity. The conditions facing African Americans, Latinos and other nationally oppressed people are disproportionately bad and getting worse. Symbolic of the top leadership’s tone-deafness on national oppression, it was an affront to Latino workers, an increasingly important group of the specially oppressed, to dismiss the Spanish-language editor of the PWW.
  • Build political independence ideologically and organizationally. Support progressive Democrats when they take the side of the people, and oppose them when they take the side of corporate and military interests. Support progressive independents. Run Communist candidates where possible and appropriate.
  • Oppose in principle the wars in Iraq, Afghanistan, and Pakistan as predatory, unjust wars that must end at once. Oppose U.S. imperialism in all its manifestations.
  • Build mass people’s movements with renewed energy, including the anti-war movement, the movement for women’s equality and movements against racist and political repression. Rebuild Party-related left organizations, including in the labor movement.
  • Revive Marxist-Leninist inner Party education to enhance members’ political development. Its neglect is evident in the party leadership’s opportunistic collapse on so many issues under the ideological pressure of monopoly capital.
  • Join unequivocally the fight against the impending catastrophe of climate change and link this cause to the class struggle.
  • Heighten solidarity with the Cubans, Palestinians, and other peoples besieged by imperialism.
  • Work with other Communist Parties, such as the Greeks and Portuguese, who have been confronting opportunism and promoting international Communist cooperation in recent years.

Most of us recognize that the Party’s practice in the recent period, sadly, has fallen far short of these aspirations.

The blame belongs squarely with the Party’s general political and ideological line, and not, as some say, member lethargy. The political line, rendering us indistinguishable from the Democrats, makes recruitment hard, saps Party morale, and leads to chronic financial crisis.

All clear-headed Communists acknowledge that, in response to the greatest capitalist crisis in 70 years, President Obama has opened up some policy debates around health care, job creation, workers’ rights, environmental protection and nuclear disarmament. These issues were not and are not even on the agenda of the Republican Party.

Yet these positive openings do not cancel out the Administration’s role in the growing death and destruction in Afghanistan, the billions of dollars pouring into Wall Street banks and the corporations, the re-authorization of the blockade of socialist Cuba, or the refusal to reverse Bush’s policies of rendition and the abridgement of civil liberties.

These openings do not justify exaggerating the “possibilities” opened up by the Obama presidency or warrant fantasies about a “social movement” led by Obama.

More and more, the Party line subordinates everything to Democratic Party electoral work. It fails to grasp the centrality, the sheer gravity and scope of this world capitalist economic crisis and the hardships the crisis is inflicting on the working class, and the corresponding need for a militant fight-back.

The line wildly exaggerates Obama’s progressive side and sows illusions about the Democratic Party as a vehicle for social change.

The Iraq War rages on. The President recently signed an all-time high $680 billion war budget, an obscenity, yet the Party voice is muffled.

The line since the last convention has weakened our ties to the international Communist movement. Too many joint statements by the world movement on the Middle East and other burning issues go unsigned by the CPUSA. Our Party’s rosy “analysis” of the Obama Administration is rejected by the rest of a world Communist movement which is mobilizing against U.S. imperialism’s current crimes.

Some top leaders push technological panaceas. Yet the over-reliance on technology is creating a party of people sitting alone in front of a computer screen. The Internet cannot substitute for direct mass contact with workers through print publications. It cannot replace struggle in the streets, shops, and communities.

Militant tactics measuring up to the desperate conditions created by this economic crisis are not pushed by the CPUSA. In practice, the current political line ignores the lessons of the 1930s and our Party’s finest legacies, the CIO, and the building of all mass movements from the grass roots.

Our Party publications have lost working-class common sense. Their pages lavish undeserved praise on the Administration, and downplay what really matters such as: an immediate end to the U.S. aggressions in the Middle East; a jobs program which is not a carbon copy of the AFL-CIO program, and which puts forth advanced demands such as a cut in the workweek with no cut in pay; equality for all nationally oppressed groups; an end to the blockade of Cuba and freedom for the Cuban Five; and health care reform worthy of the name.

The gap between reality and the current political line has rarely been greater.

We need a change. We want to restore a fighting Communist Party organization that leads struggle.

Let’s make the most of our pre-convention discussion.

Onlooker’s comment on U.S. fascism
| January 9, 2016 | 8:44 pm | Analysis, political struggle | Comments closed

I am reminded of Lenin’s definition of a revolutionary situation, whose language is reflected in this comment of mine:

 

* * * *

Two minutes of embryonic fascism from yesterday (Jan. 8, video link below)
It may seem everything is going according to plan for the U.S. fascists and their financial-monopoly money bags.
But I am very glad that AFL-CIO president Trumka representing 15 million workers has spoken against the push to divide workers along religious lines.
People are being pulled into two diverging and combative political movements in the U.S., pulled by the millions into action.
They each cannot continue to live in the same way.
The fascists plan is to:
1. Suck workers into fighting each other on sectarian lines.
2. Have them fight for solutions that leave the real problem untouched in a reckless effort to prolong the rotting profit system
This is a situation where even capitalists have lost faith in their own system and are starting to decide they can rule in the same way no longer.
The sulfurous smell of war and the open terrorist dictatorship of the financial-monopoly capitalist class is in the air.
But the labour movement is rising against it, millions of people behind Bernie Sanders’ socialist nomination bid are staunchly opposed to fascism, and the U.S. election will be a supreme test for democracy versus incipient fascism.
Note also that two people wore a label “Muslim” as demanded by Trump, but only the woman was targeted for eviction.

 

 

http://www.cnn.com/2016/01/08/politics/donald-trump-muslim-woman-protesting-ejected/index.html?sr=fbCNN010916donald-trump-muslim-woman-protesting-ejected0229PMVODtopLink&linkId=20232169

OR

https://www.facebook.com/cnn/videos/10154366085446509/?pnref=story

 

– Darrell Rankin, a Canadian comrade.

Two posts on the CPUSA by a Canadian comrade
| January 6, 2016 | 8:18 am | About the CPUSA, Analysis, political struggle | Comments closed

by Darrell Rankin  Leader, Communist Party of Canada – Manitoba

I’ve thought a bit more about Elena’s letter. There seems to be a rise in developments and plans lately in the CPUSA. There was Tyner’s letter and the November decision to focus on the PW, not the party, and the liquidation of the YCL. I may be missing a few developments.

It is wrong to read too much into this as an onlooker, but there seems to be strong and conflicting discussions within the leadership. Elena’s letter is liquidationist to the core, intended to demoralize and weaken the party. Tyner’s is the opposite, but he is now retired and more on the periphery. The plan to elevate the PW over the party is liquidationist.

If the party is facing liquidation, the experience in Canada (1989-1992) was that the money question came to the fore. So far, there’s no sign of dispute over that, but then the assets are still in the hands of the liquidationists.

The problem is liquidationism, and no other.

Marxist parties went through this at other times of crisis (1907-11, 1914, 1991), and the party crises all corresponded closely to crises in the dominant system (capitalism).

By all accounts, capitalism is headed towards more, not fewer or smaller, crises in the year or years ahead, much like in 1991.

Capitalism’s general crisis continues to deepen, and the mood and volatility of workers is on the upswing. They are not as likely to be fooled by Gorbachev’s convergence theory of universal values and a peace dividend, which explains imperialism’s drive to the right and for war.

Liquidationism is carried out by defeatists, by people with no confidence in the working class and no energy to find the right tactics. It is of the greatest assistance to the capitalists who want nothing more than to prevent the organization of revolutionary forces.

So I think this is not just an internal dispute unconnected to life. Liquidationism is connected to pressures on and changes in the working class, in the US and globally – Trump fascism, the rise of resistance to racism, the renewal of socialism as the alternative, and so on.

These are the conditions for the party to affirm its aim and to grow, and they are calling it quits.

These are times of growing danger but also of need and opportunity. It is impossible to say how long these conditions will last, but we can see how unstable capitalism has been recently.

Workers are looking for alternatives and a way out. This is not the time to liquidate, as happened on a world scale in 1914 and 1991.

I’m sure other parties are feeling or will feel such pressure. There may be signs that this is an international development, yet I see no dots to connect right now.

But US politics are pretty insular.

The world sees much of the US, but the US sees little of the world.

Darrell Rankin

* * * *

(Posted on facebook)https://www.facebook.com/darrell.rankin.9

Gus Hall and the CPUSA today

Gus Hall left a brilliant legacy for revolutionary workers in the United States and internationally. His books are models of explaining capitalism and the need for socialism in plain language.

Hall was one of the leading Marxists of the last century and is worth consulting on all of today’s major issues.

His books are essential reading on the working class, racism, imperialism, the environment, and many other topics.

They are available on used book sites on the internet, but not at International Publishers (located next to the CPUSA offices in New York) which remaindered his books in 2007.

This was a great loss.

Worse, many of the people who paid tribute to Hall when he passed in 2000 at a celebration of this life (see the appended video) are now openly campaigning to change the name of the communist party and drop its Marxist-Leninist ideology.

I hope they do not succeed. Such a move would liquidate the CPUSA and its role in organizing and strengthening the revolutionary working class’ struggle for peace, socialism, and the overthrow of capitalist imperialism.

When far-right forces are working hard to push U.S. imperialism towards war and domestic repression and when socialism is gaining tens of millions of adherents, it is the wrong time to lose a revolutionary party like this.

– DR

http://www.c-span.org/video/?160702-1/gus-hall-memorial-service

Gus Hall memorial service
| January 5, 2016 | 8:57 pm | About the CPUSA, political struggle | Comments closed

http://www.c-span.org/video/?160702-1/gus-hall-memorial-service

Have we concluded that we cannot build the CPUSA today? – Jarvis Tyner
| January 5, 2016 | 8:48 pm | About the CPUSA, political struggle | Comments closed

December 01, 2015

Jarvis Tyner Member of the National Committee, CPUSA asks the Party Leadership, “Have we concluded that we cannot build the Communist Party USA today?”

 http://permanentred.blogspot.com/2015/12/jarvis-tyner-member-of-national.html

“Have we concluded that we cannot build the Communist Party USA today?” :  Jarvis Tyner Member of the National Committee, CPUSA

It’s in our Hands… (On the Direction of the CPUSA)








BASIS FOR SUMMARIZED REMARKS BEFORE THE NATIONAL COMMITTEE MEETING OF CPUSA in Chicago Illinois • November 14th 2015
Posted by: Estevan Nembhard @ 2:00 PM  Monday, Nov. 30, 2015
New York State Communist Party
235 W 23RD ST • NEW YORK, NY 10011
212-924-0550 • CPNY@CPUSA.ORG
Link: http://newyorkcp.blogspot.ca/2015/11/its-in-our-hands-on-direction-of-cpusa.html

IT’S IN OUR HANDS….

By Jarvis Tyner Member of the National Committee, CPUSA

I am deeply concerned.

I come before you today with a heart full of a love for our party and all comrades. Because I love our party I have  deep concerns about the current political and organizational direction we are headed in. 

We are at a critical moment in our history.  This is a time when an open socialist can run for the highest office in the land and win the support not of thousands but of millions.   There is also a good fighting chance that our nation may elect its first Liberal Democratic woman President.  At the same time, the extreme right is using this election to make a big push to restore its momentum, to win total political dominance put their disastrous program fully in place.  After the new level of mass rejection they have faced during the Obama era they are pushing for new decades of extreme right wing rule. 

Donald Trump the extreme right wing demagogue is running hard on the anti immigrant, racist, pro war, pro corporate, anti women policies.  As the GOP front-runner he poses a grave threat to democracy.  Ben Carson’s policies are just as destructive.     The fact that these two are leading the Republican wolf pack is not a sign of strength it is a sign of the political and moral bankruptcy of that party. 

Fortunately, there is a multi racial labor and people’s progressive electoral coalition that defeated them in 2008 and 2012.  If inspired, organized and united they can be defeated again.  Our party’s role is very important and in many areas we are recognized and welcomed as a active part of that winning coalition.  

My Concerns…

The idea being pushed in our ranks that our Party faces an “existential crisis”, does not inspire but demoralizes comrades and I believe is a wrong assessment.   It’s not accurate and it promotes the false view in my opinion that we are weak, ineffective even moribund.  That is not the experience in NY District and in other districts as well.  Many of our allies and coalition partners do not agree with that assessment either and wish the party well.    If that assessment is adopted as a starting point in our work it can become a self-fulfilling disaster for our Party. 

I have in my hands 30 recruitment cards from the NYC area which I believe are 30 good reasons to reject that assessment.  These are people who have joined since 2013 from our mass work.  It does not include our internet joiners and new members in the upstate areas. 

Just last week in our district, Estevan our party organizer and our rep on the planning Committee of the food workers action, on Tuesday introduced the political approach and basic ideas that helped forge the alliance of the low wage workers movement and the Black Lives Matter movement.  We also took many timely practical steps to realize that alliance.  Our prestige in both movements has gone way up.   Because of that kind of work, Eric Garner’s mother Gwen Carr agreed to be an honoree at our Better World Awards luncheon along with Amina Baraka, Ricky Eisenberg, Ava Farkus, new Director of Met Council on Housing and Jose Sanchez a leader of the NY Fast Food forward movement. 

Some of you may have seen the picture of Estevan in the NY Daily News.  He was right up front at the Fast Food Workers demo in NY.  And we had a full house at the “Better World Awards Luncheon.  It was a beautiful event. 

A Party of Action

To be effective we communists must not only talk the talk, we must also walk the walk.  

If it is our financial situation that threatens our existence,  let’s discuss it.  Lets develop a plan. It certainly does not call for a “panic move” like selling our NY building.  Our building is the largest source of income we have and the most solid foundation for our future financial stability.   If we sell the building, a potentially grave crisis will exist in our future. 

I understand that we have a problem of age and energy among our most committed and experienced members.  I am for positive advances in the work of the party but we should not dismantle the political and organizational essence of our party because some of our veterans  are demoralized or just tired.  I understand that but  like a lot of us I know this Party can attract more youth and can be built and we are doing it.  

I do not believe we are on our last leg as a Party…

In my view, that the estimate is not helping us move forward.  It is helping to rationalize major political and organizational retrenchments of our Party when this is a time when a revitalized and growing CPUSA is needed.

 But, let me say this, even if we were facing the projected collapse of our Party I believe we must not give up and not abandon longstanding Party norms, but mobilize our membership and supporters and fight our way out of it just as this Party has done numerous times for over 96 years.   

2. I am for a powerful on-line presence going back to Gus Hall’s information Super Highway concept back in the 1980’s.  But that has never meant that we didn’t need an active and well organized, functioning party organization as well.   

3. I am for the new initiative to build a communist students organization.  But why should it mean we have to liquidate the organization of the YCL among non-college youth.  If a district wants to build the YCL why can’t it?  By the way, in my opinion, that is a decision that should have been made at the 30th Convention but it was not.   The same with the dropping Leninism which was pushed as a tactical change (Americanize our basic language) but in life, as the youth proposal shows it was a rejection of the Leninist concept of the organizational independence of the youth league.  

Personally I quote all kinds of US historic and current heroic figures but I see no contradiction in also quoting Lenin and calling myself a Marxist-Leninist.

4.  I am for finding the forms to aggressively organize the over 2,000 at large Internet members but I am also for the restoration of Party organizational norms.  So we cannot just talk that talk but “Walk that Walk” a lot better.  We are a party of action and we need organized clubs, districts and commissions.  We need dues collection and well-organized fund drives.  We need recruiting drives and public meetings all across the country. 

To do what needs to be done, we need to work towards the restoration of functioning organizational collectives in the Party on all levels.   
If we cannot find a National Organizational Secretary today finding one and building a collective should nevertheless be on the Party’s “wish list” as something we work for.

And why can’t we have a regular modest organizational newsletter that would report on the good work of the party across the country? 

5. I am for the on-line People’s World that is considered a movement newspaper but at the same time why can’t it also be the newspaper of the Communist Party?  The current experience with the PW in the labor movement, and with the “Better world Awards Luncheons” shows that this can be done and our core constituencies will support us. We need a fighting Party with a mass paper, not a mass newspaper with a weak or worse no Party… That is if we are to remain a revolutionary working class Party….

When you couple these proposals with the push to change the name of the party (which must be a convention decision also)  I ask, have we concluded that we cannot build the Communist Party USA today? And again, is this the conclusion of a group of people who are tired? Certainly it is not a conclusion we have come to together.

A lot of comrades feel that we are backing into a phased liquidation of this great party of ours.  Are we giving up the leading role of the working class and industrial concentration and the centrality of fight against racism?  Our efforts at recruitment among people of color and workers might suggest perhaps we are.  I hope I am wrong on this but it looks to me like some leading comrades have given up on the party having a public face and feel that we have to hide the party. If that is true, it is the biggest problem we face. 

I think if we are going to have a presence at demos, county fairs, union events and peace and environment conferences, street fairs and door to door concentration, we need well written mass pamphlets and literature.  And why can’t we work to have a hard copy of the PW and PA once or twice a year to start.  

I believe we must not let what we can’t do stop us from doing what we can do.  There is a lot we can do.  We need honest discussions on all these matters.
 In conclusion, in 3 years our party will celebrate our 100th Birthday.  This is a big occasion and we must make it a big deal.  Every September up to then we should be a celebration ending with our Centennial in 2019. 

We had a celebration of our 96th in our district and over 60 people came and we recruited 5 members.  

Finally, on our legacy. 

We should not allow the basic character of our party to be defined by our mistakes shortcomings, rather then by our hard work, and tenacity and courage that over came the most vicious, coordinated unrelenting effort by the most powerful imperialist class in the world to destroy us.  Under those conditions we fought back and scored victories.  

Today we are the only political party in the US that thinks its necessary to do a public mea culpa to be credible.  It is US capitalist ruling class that owes the people here and around the world including our Party specifically an apology for its crimes.   

Our Party’s courage and sacrifices produced the greatest victories of our class and people.  Bill Foster, Gus, Winny, Elizabeth, Hy, Ben, Ethel, Julius, Betty, Irving, Claudia, William Burghardt, Robeson, Gene Dennis and Angela Davis; all of the great comrades and more went to jail, or where exiled and persecuted to legalize this party and advance the fight for democracy.  They sacrificed much so that the people’s movement and our party could survive and continue its great contribution.  They did it so that we US Communists today wouldn’t have to endure such attacks in the future.  

“Don’t give up the fight”

We are still here and still fighting.  This party has been and must continue to be a force for enormous good and progress.    

…It is in our hands.

Let me end by saying this.  I have no malice towards any comrade, whether they agree or disagree with me.  I am for Party unity.  I am motivated primarily by a concern for the long term survival, growth and well-being this party of ours.. as a revolutionary working class party.    

It’s in our hands…

Reply to: Elena Mora resigns from the CPUSA
| January 4, 2016 | 8:55 pm | About the CPUSA, political struggle | Comments closed

by James Thompson

Elena Mora’s letter of resignation from the CPUSA should be welcomed and applauded. Her observations about the party are very accurate. The CPUSA, under her leadership and that of Sam Webb, has been in recent years a party based in fantasy rather than reality. Ms. Mora speaks of this and should be applauded for her honesty.

She and her partner in crime (Sam Webb) have come very close to wrecking the party. Their most recent maneuver has been to push for a change in the name of the party. Since it is clear that she and her partner do not want to be communists and do not embrace Marxist Leninist ideology, it is appropriate for both of them to quit the party. Since they value so highly the Democratic Party, a bourgeois party, it would be appropriate for them to swear their allegiance to that organization. It is and has not been appropriate for them to denigrate the CPUSA from their positions of leadership.

Hopefully, the party in an effort to heal itself from the damage done by these two culprits will see to it that they are not able to abscond with any of the assets of the party. Hopefully, the party can now move forward and transform itself into a working class party rather than pathetic worshipers of the Democratic Party.

I’m sure there will be many replies to Ms. Mora’s hypocritical letter.

I would like to expose one of the elements she addresses in the letter, recruitment. Attached you will find a copy of an email from Ms. Mora to me. Before she, Sam Webb and others with the able assistance of their henchman, John Bachtell, expelled me from the party and refused to give me a trial, I had begged them to forward the names of people interested in the party to me so that I could build the party in Houston. The following email explains it all:

From: elena mora

Sent: Tuesday, May 19, 2009 5:14 AM

To: Paul

Cc: Jarvis Tyner ; Gene Lantz ; Elaine Lantz ; Sam Webb

Subject: Re: problems reported in contacting the national website

 

Pat, please forward any member inquiries you get from people in other states, via facebook, to this email address: markva39@aol.com We have a system in place for handling requests to join, which has been in place for quite a while now. The comrades assigned to this are very responsible about it. In most– if not all– districts, requests to join are followed up on — this does’t mean that every single person gets involved with the work of the local club, for different reasons that are specific to the local situation, and which you wouldn’t know about The Party’s web page is being redesigned, the project is due for completion in July, and we are making every effort to utilize the internet in the many ways it can be used to grow our Party. Last but not least: no one is withholding Houston contacts from you, as I, and others, have said in the past, and you should stop agitating about this. And the implication that people around the country are negligent is really unfair; comrades are struggling hard to participate in the political life of their areas, and grow the Party and press, it isn’t easy. Facebook is a great tool which others are starting to use locally as well, so that’s good news. Elena

On Mon, May 18, 2009 at 10:35 PM, Paul <phill1917@comcast.net> wrote:

Here is a comment I received today from a guy in Baltimore trying desperately to become active with the party. I received the comment on our Houston Facebook page.

 

i’d love any contacts you can help me with I actually joined the party two years ago and registered. I’ve been patiently awaiting further instruction ever since. the national site and e-mail hasn’t been very receptive. although i do realize the baltimore chapter has had it’s fair share of people joining just to exploit them so i understand the hesitation to initiate newer members.. jordan

 

This is just one of many such comments. I also received a comment from a guy in New Jersey today thanking me because I responded to his inquiry and put him in touch with the New Jersey club. They are trying to organize a club that will be near him.

 

I have asked the guy in Baltimore for his e-mail address so that I can try to help facilitate his contacting national and/or the Baltimore club. I’m doing this because I hope someone will return the favor by sending Houston contacts to us.

 

BTW, we have not received any names in Houston recently. I have, however, recruited two people from Facebook in the last month who have actually joined and paid dues. Believe it or not, our club is up to eight people now. A year ago it was two.

 

Peace & solidarity

Pat

Elena Mora resigns from the CPUSA
| January 3, 2016 | 7:54 pm | About the CPUSA | 9 Comments

Dearest friends,

 

Some of you have heard that I resigned last month from the National Board and National Committee, so I’m writing to explain.

 

​Fifteen years ago we began a long-overdue process of change and renovation of the Party. Unfortunately, deep-seated resistance was a drag on that process, every step of the way. This would be a very long letter if I gave even a few examples of the problem, so I won’t do that, because in the end, my biggest concern boils down to whether the organization itself is viable.

 

​I am convinced, after 35 years in the Party, 29 of which were spent working full time, that it cannot be built because we have not been able to adapt to new conditions.

 

​I make this heretical statement from the vantage point of someone whose jobs over those 29 years were almost always focused on the organization itself (NY Organization Secretary, NY District Organizer, National Organization Secretary).

 

​We tried many, many things — we tried everything! From the basic approach of asking members to “recruit” people they worked with in movements, unions and neighborhoods, ​to public  spokespeople whose job it was to promote and grow the Party​, to ​street recruiting and​ making it possible to sign up online, we tried everything. I think we tried very hard​.

 

​We engaged in endless discussions about how to get our ​members to recruit others. Because hardly anyone recruited — full timers and a few other brave souls were the exception. ​Yet instead of criticizing people for this lack of recruiting results (or making excuses for it), we should have examined it. Instead of looking at the reluctance of all of those comrades (often the best members, the most active in “mass work”), and concluding that maybe they were onto something, we told ourselves over and over that all we had to do was convince them otherwise, and we’d grow.

 

The culture of seeing the world through rose-​colored glasses; of calling the glass half full when in fact it is just leaking; of denial of reality, is very strong in the Party. And perhaps some of it was unavoidable, and maybe even served a purpose, given what we’re up against.

 

​But here we are, in 2015, and that culture is so powerful that we will not admit what is absolutely true and completely obvious: we are tiny, we are shrinking, we are aging, fast, and this has been the direction for decades. People may like us, they may tell us privately that they think we’re the greatest activists and organizers, but they very rarely join and most of those who do become like the rest of us – reluctant to claim and build the organization.

 

Bernie S​anders’ popularity does not alter in any way the negative connotations of the words “communism” and “Communist Party.” As a matter of fact, his popularity is an argument in favor of changing our name; in favor of trying to create an organization that reflects and represents the values he talks about and to which people are attracted.

​

I have been pushing for such big changes, first and foremost, in our name, but more than that. I’m for an entirely new formation with radical, democratic, egalitarian, humanistic, ecological, socialist politics; with an organizational culture that encourages innovation and experimentation, requires critical discussion and scrupulous realism, and prizes collectivity and transparency.

 

I think we need an organization that fits how people live, work, think and feel today, which is so profoundly different from even a decade, let alone a century, ago.

 

As I said, though we started this process of change quite a long time ago, too many resisted it, including, or maybe even especially, those in leadership. For all kinds of reasons it has been incredibly hard for people to set ​aside their personal feelings about this, about our history, about the heroic and priceless contributions we can rightly claim as ours, to the struggle for peace, equality and justice.

 

​And believe me, I have those attachments too, starting with pride in my own family’s history; in ​my uncles, one of whom went to jail during the McCarthy period, another who fought the fascists in Spain, and another who chose prison rather than going to Vietnam. I am proud of my parents who stood by him and protested that war; who were in Washington when Dr. King made his I Have a Dream speech and participated in the Civil Rights movement, and who supported me (including at times financially) when I decided to work full time for the Party. I have been proud to call myself a Communist since I was 20 years old, and it’s how I chose to be known by everyone in my life, almost all my life.

 

​But now I have concluded that since I don’t believe the Communist Party can be built, and that a very different kind of organization is needed, and since I can’t stand the culture of denial and what amounts to allowing something I value deeply – our politics – to go down the drain, I can no longer participate.

​

​A couple of years ago I sent a letter to people in the leadership, in which I argued that we should not only get rid of the name, but go further and initiate something new. I said we should take our irreplaceable essence — broad, thoughtful, strategic politics, our love of humanity, our Marxist method of analyzing and understanding the world, our integrity and working-class character — and create something new. We should be ready to join with others in the formation of a new left organization that fits today’s conditions and moves away from the political margins. Such an organization is desperately needed and would make a big contribution.

 

I also believe we could do this in a way that examined the past, honoring the good part, rejecting the bad, and learning from both.

 

However, that letter and countless other letters, discussions and meetings in which I’ve made this case, didn’t convince enough of you. My level of frustration has become damaging, to me and to you, many of whom I’ve know and loved and worked side by side with for decades. So I’m letting it go, and will find another way to participate in the struggle to right the many, many things that are wrong in this world of ours. I feel as passionately about that now as I ever did – maybe even more so.

 

All the best,

 

Elena