Category: Donald Trump
GOP AND SUPER-REACTIONARIES
By A. Shaw
The GOP is splitting and the split pieces of the party are in turn splitting.
Four major factions seem to have emerged.
(1) The GOP establishment faction, consisting of
officeholders
major contributors,
political consultants,
party bureaucracy
Donald Trump is the boss of the Establishment.
(2) tea bag faction
Ted Cruz is the main leader of the tea bags.
After Trump humiliated Cruz in the primaries, a lot of tea bags defected to Trump.
Officeholders who are tea bags play dual roles — both tea bag and officeholder.
Before the rise of Trump, tea bags were widely regarded as the most reactionary or, if you prefer, the most conservative faction in the GOP.
The influence of the tea bags rests in large part on the tea bag capability to turn out a large number of individuals highly trained in campaign management. Ordinary tea bags are often the equals of political consultants connected to the GOP establishment.
(3) Trump faction
 
This faction is a personality cult based on Trump.
Trump has won over supporters from the three other factions.
The Trump faction is zealous but unorganized and untrained. It rides the personality of Trump.
(4) Alt-Right faction
On Aug. 25, 2016, Hillary Clinton said this about Trump:
“He is taking hate groups mainstream and helping a radical fringe take over the Republican Party.”
This “radical fringe” calls itself Alt-Right and it boasts that it is super-reactionary.
Alt-Right doesn’t have absolute control over the GOP because there are still representatives of the old establishment hanging around.
But the Alt-Right wallows in its relative control of the GOP.
In other words, lunatics and swine virtually control the GOP.  The old establishment in the GOP didn’t put up a fight.
Stephen Bannon is widely recognized as Alt-Right’s top leader.
Trump appointed Bannon to the post of “special advisor to the president.”
Alt-Right insists that it is far more reactionary, conservative, and lunatic than either the GOP establishment, tea bags, or  Trump faction.
Alt-Right has digested the whole body of reactionary propaganda, but it gives certain propaganda special emphasis.
Alt-Right singles out:
(1) Hate in general
(2) Racism
(3) Sexism
Alt-Right reactionaries hate with extreme intensity blacks, Latinos, and Jews.
These reactionaries hate women who are not docile to men.
Trump and Dictatorship
| November 13, 2016 | 8:37 pm | class struggle, Donald Trump, political struggle | Comments closed
By A. Shaw
Soon after Sandra O’Connor stepped down from her seat on the US Supreme Court, she gave a speech at Georgetown University School of Law in which she said “US democracy is degenerating into a dictatorship.”
About the same time, former Vice President Al Gore gave a speech titled “US Democracy In Grave Danger.”
The capitalist press suppressed the O’Connor speech and ignored Gore’s speech.
Both speeches try to express the contemporary essence of US politics.
Today, the essence of US politics is a struggle of forces led by the reactionary bourgeoisie aiming to destroy democracy against opposing forces led by the liberal bourgeoisie aiming to preserve democracy.
The forces led by the reactionary bourgeoisie aiming to destroy democracy in USAÂ are winning. They will soon control all three branches of the central government and 40 out of 50 state governments.
The election of Donald Trump is a shocking victory for the reactionary sector of the US bourgeoisie which seeks to
destroy democracy and thereby to nullify the Constitution.
A DEFINITION OF THE BOURGEOISIE
A millionaire is somebody with a net worth of at least one million dollars.
Net worth refers to the difference between assets and liabilities.
Under this definition, there are in the USA between 8 and 10 million millionaires.
So, roughly speaking, the bourgeoisie varies around 3% of the US population.
The number of US millionaires varies between 8 and 10 million with the ups and downs of the capitalist economy.
Politically, about 70% of the US bourgeoisie is reactionary, about 20% liberal, and the remaining 10% is divided among centrists and other fringe types.
 
CONSTITUTION AND THE STATE
1.What is a state?
A state is an institution that exclusively exercises supreme power over its territory and
people.
2. What is the form of a state?
The form reveals HOW state power is exercised — e.g., elected representatives or appointees, number houses in legislature, separation of powers into number of branches, jurisdiction of the supreme court, terms of office, so on and so forth with hundreds of other questions dealing with How government power is exercised.
Democracy, autocracy, monarchy, and oligarchy are the most common forms of state
Under bourgeois ideology, all non-democracies are dictatorships.
3. What is the content of the state?
Content reveals WHO chiefly exercises state power.
“WHO” refers to which social class or classes chiefly exercise state power.
The working class, middle class, lumpen, small farmers, and the bourgeoisie are the most common social classes.
A constitution is a document that prescribes and describes the form of state.
A constitution prescribes HOW state power ought to be exercised.
A constitution is a picture of the state. A state that conforms to its constitution is lawful.
If the state is a democracy, the constitution prescribes and describes the kind of democracy it is.
In accordance with the provisions of the US Constitution, the bourgeois state in the USA is a democracy as long as the regime abides by the provisions of the US Constitution.
A US president-elect must take an oath before he or she can assume office.
“I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will faithfully execute the office of president of the United States and will to the best of my ability, preserve, protect, and defend the Constitution of the United States.” Art. II, Sec. 1, US Constitution
When Donald Trump “solemnly swears or affirms,” he will add another big lie to his list of lies.
Trump will “”faithlessly execute” his office and attempt to turn his office into a dictatorship.
Instead of “preserving, protecting, and defending” the Constitution, Trump, to the best of his ability, will trash the Constitution and the democracy that reflects the Constitution.
George W. Bush, Trump’s most recent GOP White House predecessor, shouted in early 2003 at four timid GOP congressmen that the “US Constitution is nothing but a Goddamn piece of paper.”
 
Trump speaks and acts as if the US Constitution is already less than a Goddamn piece of paper.
Trump intends to wipe his ass with the Goddamn piece of paper.
Indeed, Trump has already wiped his ass with the Constitution and the democracy based on it.
In violation of the 14th Amendment of the US Constitution, Trump says he will not recognize the US citizenship of persons born in the  USA if their parents entered the USA illegally.
In violation of the 1st Amendment, Trump threatens to bar people from entering the USA based on their religious beliefs.
In violation of the 14th Amendment, Trump threatens to qualify and disqualify judges based on their race  and/or national origin.
In violation of the 5th amendment, Trump hints he will revive George W. Bush’s  executive privileges of kidnapping and throwing people into concentration camps if he suspects they are terrorists.
In violation of the 5th and 8th Amendments and Geneva Conventions, Trumps hints he will resume George W. Bush’s privileges of torturing and murdering people whom he kidnaps and throws into concentration camps.
The reactionary sector of the US bourgeoisie believes that if their sector renames and re-defines a criminal act, the act is no longer criminal.
Accordingly, kidnapping is now called rendering.
Concentration camps are now black sites.
Torture is interrogation.
Murder is extra-judicial disposal.
Reactionaries argue that the Constitution doesn’t apply to these crimes once they’re redefined and renamed.
Reactionary judges in federal courts enthusiastically approve this reactionary nonsense.
Under Trump, the masses can expect a tremendous acceleration of renamed criminal acts.
DEMOCRACY
 
The bourgeois, middle class, and working class reactionaries want to destroy democracy in the USA.
Let’s look at the conventional concept of representative democracy.
Democracy is a form of state in which:
(1) supreme power resides with the body of citizens entitled to vote or who vote …  (the sovereignty principle)
(2) these citizens elect representatives who exercise state power … (the electoral principle)
(3) the elected representatives are accountable to these citizens … (the accountability principle)
(4) the elected representatives exercise state power in accordance with the rule of law… (the rule of law principle)
These four principles are said to express the essence of democracy.
Reactionaries seek to exclude non-reactionary voters from the ” body of citizens entitled to vote.”
Reactionaries seek to elect candidates who will discreetly or flagrantly exercise state power in a way that is contrary to the rule of law.
So, the principal targets of the reactionary political offensive are (2), the electoral principle and (4), the rule of law principle.
The US regime is a bourgeois democracy. Whether it remains a democracy depends on the political will and spirit of working class, middle class and bourgeois liberals.
At this moment, the reactionaries are winning but the liberals are putting up a good fight.
Fascism
| November 12, 2016 | 10:37 pm | Analysis, class struggle, Donald Trump, Imperialism, political struggle, socialism | Comments closed

Fascism

by James Thompson

Let’s examine Georgi Dimitrov’s classic definition of fascism:

Fascism has also been described as “the open terrorist dictatorship of the most reactionary, most chauvinistic and most imperialist elements of finance capital.” According to Georgi Dmitrov in a collection of his reports in 1935 and 1936 Against Fascism and War, fascism is “the power of finance capital itself. It is the organization of terrorist vengeance against the working class and the revolutionary section of the peasantry and intelligentsia. In foreign policy, fascism is jingoism in its most brutal form, fomenting bestial hatred of other nations.”

Let’s break down this classic definition into its key components:

  1. An open terroristic dictatorship of the bourgeoisie

The bourgeoisie represents the most reactionary sector of the population. The bourgeoisie displays astounding unity in its effort to fight for the interests of the bourgeois class. The bourgeoisie always fights against the interests of the working class. This is why the working class has been subjugated to abject poverty. The bourgeoisie is not shy about employing terroristic tactics to oppress the working class. Indeed, the bourgeoisie has been very effective in destroying any efforts to fight for the interests of the working class.

  1. A dictatorship of the reactionary sector of the population

Although the bourgeoisie represents the most reactionary sector of the population, they, the 1%, could not survive without the support of the general reactionary sector of the population. Currently, the bourgeoisie has the steadfast support of large numbers of sycophants, opportunists and revisionists. In the most recent electoral cycle (2016), 47% of people who voted expressed their support for extreme reaction.

  1. A dictatorship of chauvinism

Chauvinism is an expression of the belief of superiority of certain sectors of the population over others. The bourgeoisie inherently views itself as superior to everyone else. The bourgeoisie represents an extremely small sector of the population, however they have the support of large numbers of opportunists. In the most recent electoral cycle (2016), 47% of the population who voted expressed their support for extreme chauvinism.

  1. A dictatorship of imperialism

Imperialism is a strategy of subjugating the working people in other sovereign nations to the will of the bourgeoisie. It is a fight to the death for cheap labor, appropriation of natural resources and ultimately, global domination. Extreme chauvinism dictates hatred of other nations and minority sectors of the population. Terroristic tactics are used under fascist governments to destroy resistance and maximize profit for capitalist enterprises around the globe. Under fascism, working class and revolutionary resistance around the globe are mercilessly suppressed “by any means necessary.” The needs of working people around the upload are ignored and the demands of the capitalists receive first priority. “The ends justify the means” is the slogan of fascist perpetrators. Fascists also seek to confuse people by conflating fascism with socialism and/or communism. The differences between fascism and socialism/communism are stark and unmistakable.

  1. Finance capital

According to Wikipedia:

Finance capitalism or financial capitalism is the subordination of processes of production to the accumulation of money profits in a financial system.[1]

Financial capitalism is thus a form of capitalism where the intermediation of saving to investment becomes a dominant function in the economy, with wider implications for the political process and social evolution:[2] since the late 20th century it has become the predominant force in the global economy,[3] whether in neoliberal or other form.[

Finance capitalism subjugates industrial production to the maximization of profits. In order to achieve the maximization of profits, Karl Marx has proven that the capitalists must seek the cheapest labor possible.

It is no secret that Donald Trump transported Polish workers to the USA in order to construct the buildings he owns. It is easy to surmise that his agenda was to secure the cheapest labor possible in order to complete his building projects.

The working class around the world is waiting to see if a Donald Trump administration meets all the criteria of fascism. The working class around the world is also considering its options to oppose fascism in all its forms. The recent demonstrations in the USA epitomize the possibilities for resistance. The question is “Will the working class be able to continue its resistance to fascist extremism?”

Africa/Global: Climate Threat, Action Tracks
| November 11, 2016 | 6:06 pm | Africa, Climate Change, Donald Trump, environmental crisis, Latin America, political struggle | Comments closed

AfricaFocus Bulletin
November 10, 2016 (161110)
(Reposted from sources cited below)

Editor’s Note

“Africa is already burning. The election of Trump is a disaster for
our continent. The United States, if it follows through on its new
President’s rash words about withdrawing from the international
climate regime, will become a pariah state in global efforts for
climate action. This is a moment where the rest of the world must
not waver and must redouble commitments to tackle dangerous climate
change,”  Geoffrey Kamese, Friends of the Earth Africa.

For a version of this Bulletin in html format, more suitable for
printing, go to http://www.africafocus.org/docs16/ren1611.php, and
click on “format for print or mobile.”

To share this on Facebook, click on
https://www.facebook.com/sharer/sharer.php?u=http://www.africafocus.org/docs16/ren1611.php

[This version of this AfricaFocus Bulletin sent out by email contains
only brief excerpts from each article. For more extensive excerpts,
read on-line at http://www.africafocus.org/docs16/ren1611.php; for
full articles go to the link cited in each case.]

There is no doubt that the election of Donald Trump poses an extreme
threat to action on climate change, as on a host of other
interconnected issues. But, in this case, as in many others, it is
important to remember that a U.S. president, no matter how powerful,
is only one of the forces affecting the outcomes.

Yes, this is a major setback, but the threat did not begin with
Trump and the struggles to combat it must and will continue – on
multiple fronts. While no one organization or movement can fight on
all fronts, those forces fighting for justice and for a future for
our planet must have a vision of a wider background than one U.S.
presidential election.

The context is not only the United States, but the world. And the
arenas are not only political (at multiple levels of government, and
even within the executive branch of the federal government itself),
but also technical, economic, and activist (from divestment to
protest sites such as the Dakota Pipeline). No one organization or
even movement can be on all fronts at once, but together we must
find ways to strategies embedded in a wider vision rather than
engage in fruitless debates about which action track is the “most
important.”

This AfricaFocus Bulletin consists of excerpts from a selection of
statements and articles illustrating the multiple tracks on which
action to combat the threat of global warming can and must take
place, globally, in Africa, and in the United States.

* The first two statements are reactions from climate activists to
the additional threat posed by the election of Donald Trump.

* The third highlights the continuing technical and economic success
of cheap off-grid and mini-grid solar in Africa, which is now
estimated to be reaching 10% of the 600,000 Africans living off
national  electricity grids.

* The next provides a summary of both the necessity and the economic
and technical viability of a comprehensive transition away from
fossil fuels, from Oil Change International and a coalition of
related organizations.

* The fifth is an open letter from climate activist groups to the
Equator Principles Association of banks committed to social
responsibility principles, calling for withdrawal of support for the
Dakota Access Pipeline.

* The sixth is an update from the International Energy Agency,
revising upwards its projections for growth of renewable energy
worldwide.

* And the last is a report from South Africa’s Council for
Scientific and Industrial Research (CSIR) noting that “new power
from solar PV and wind today is at least 40% cheaper than that from
new baseload coal today.”

For previous AfricaFocus Bulletins on the environment and climate
issues, visit http://www.africafocus.org/intro-env.php

Other background articles worth noting:

“There’s no way around it: Donald Trump is going to be a disaster
for the planet,” Vox, Nov 9, 2016
http://tinyurl.com/oturdlb

“10 Ways You Can Help the Standing Rock Sioux Fight the Dakota
Access Pipeline”

25 Snapshots from the Stillwater Pow Wow

++++++++++++++++++++++end editor’s note+++++++++++++++++

“Deep breaths. Now let’s plan the fight ahead,” 350.org, Nov 9, 2016

[Excerpts: full text at
https://350.org/deep-breaths-now-lets-plan-the-fight-ahead/]

Here’s what I’m keeping in mind right now:

* This is a global movement. It’s more important than ever to
remember our connection with people in literally every country who
are fighting the fossil fuel industry right now — many in the
toughest conditions imaginable. I believe in our collective power
like nothing else.

* The fossil fuel industry is in a fight for its life. When we
expose their lies, stop their pipelines, divest from their stocks
and take away their social license — they fight back. Their
investment in this election was no secret, and they’re going to
double-down in its aftermath.

* Local fossil fuel resistance is taking root everywhere. Not only
has the fight against the Dakota Access pipeline spread like
wildfire, but other campaigns against fracking, pipelines, and coal
are too many to name. None of us are giving up or going home today.

********************************************************

Global Community Must Unite Against Trump to Avoid Climate
Catastrophe

Friends of the Earth International

Joint Press release

9 November 2016

http://tinyurl.com/pe4u693

As news of Donald Trump’s victory in the US Presidential Election
reached Marrakech, climate justice groups gathered at the COP22
United Nations annual climate change talks reacted:

“Whilst the election of a climate denier into the White House sends
the wrong signal globally. The grassroots movements for climate
justice – Native American communities, people of color, working
people – those that are at this moment defending water rights in
Dakota, ending fossil fuel pollution, divesting from the fossil fuel
industry, standing with communities who are losing their homes and
livelihoods from extreme weather devastation to creating a renewable
energy transformation – are the real beating heart of the movement
for change. We will redouble our efforts, grow stronger and remain
committed to stand with those on the frontline of climate injustice
at home and abroad.. In the absence of leadership from our
government, the international community must come together redouble
their effort to prevent climate disaster,” said Jesse Bragg, from
Boston-based Corporate Accountability International.

“For communities in the global south, the U.S. citizens’ choice to
elect Donald Trump seems like a death sentence. Already we are
suffering the effects of climate change after years of inaction by
rich countries like the U.S., and with an unhinged climate change
denier now in the White House, the relatively small progress made is
under threat. The international community must not allow itself to
be dragged into a race to the bottom. Other developed countries like
Europe, Canada, Australia, and Japan must increase their pledges for
pollution cuts and increase their financial support for our
communities,” said Wilfred D’Costa from the Asian Peoples’ Movement
on Debt and Development.

[continued on-line http://www.africafocus.org/docs16/ren1611.php]

***************************************************************

As prices plunge, Africa surges into clean, cheap solar energy

Maina Waruru

Mail and Guardian, 12 Oct 2016

http://tinyurl.com/nu7f9v8

Solar systems in Africa can now provide electricity for many
households for as little as $56 a year.

Last August Kenya won $36 million in support from France to put in
place 23 mini-grid systems in northern Kenya that will use solar
panels, wind or a combination of the two. (Bloomberg) Last August
Kenya won $36 million in support from France to put in place 23
mini-grid systems in northern Kenya that will use solar panels, wind
or a combination of the two. (Bloomberg) Until almost two years ago,
James Mbugua, a farmer living in Karai, a village on the outskirts
of Kenya’s capital, relied on kerosene to light his house, and a car
battery to power his television so he wouldn’t miss the news.

Part of the reason he couldn’t plug into the power grid, despite
being so close to Nairobi and in an area where electricity is
readily available, is that he lives on government land as a
squatter, with no papers to show he owns the 70-foot by 80-foot
parcel where he has put up a makeshift house.

Now, however, he has found an alternative: An affordable solar
system to power his home.

“I could not go on like that and had to seek an alternative way of
lighting my house and I discovered that with only $150 I could use
solar to light my house and power the television plus radio,” he
told the Thomson Reuters Foundation.

The money for the purchase, he said, came from a loan from his
community savings group, which asks members to contribute $5 a month
and then offers loans from that pot of cash.

The father of five grown children is one of the millions of people
across Africa who are taking advantage of falling prices of home
solar panel systems to get cheaper, cleaner and more reliable
energy.

According to the International Renewable Energy Agency (IRENA), home
solar systems in Africa can now provide electricity for many
households for as little as $56 a year – a cost lower than getting
energy from diesel or paraffin.

Of the estimated 600 million people living off-grid in Africa, about
10 percent of them are now using off-grid clean energy to light
their homes, according to IRENA statistics.

[continued on-line http://www.africafocus.org/docs16/ren1611.php]

******************************************************

The Sky’s Limit: Why the Paris Climate Goals Require a Managed
Decline of Fossil Fuel Production

Greg Muttitt, September 22, 2016

Oil Change International, in collaboration with 350.org, Amazon
Watch, APMDD, AYCC, Bold Alliance, Christian Aid, Earthworks,
Équiterre, Global Catholic Climate Movement, HOMEF, Indigenous
Environmental Network, IndyAct, Rainforest Action Network, and
Stand.earth

http://priceofoil.org/2016/09/22/the-skys-limit-report/

September 2016

Press Release

A new study released by Oil Change International, in partnership
with 14 organizations from around the world, scientifically grounds
the growing movement to keep carbon in the ground by revealing the
need to stop all new fossil fuel infrastructure and industry
expansion. It focuses on the potential carbon emissions from
developed reserves – where the wells are already drilled, the pits
dug, and the pipelines, processing facilities, railways, and export
terminals constructed.

Key Findings:

The potential carbon emissions from the oil, gas, and coal in the
world’s currently operating fields and mines would take us beyond
2deg C of warming.

The reserves in currently operating oil and gas fields alone, even
with no coal, would take the world beyond 1.5°C.

With the necessary decline in production over the coming decades to
meet climate goals, clean energy can be scaled up at a corresponding
pace, expanding the total number of energy jobs.

Key Recommendations:

No new fossil fuel extraction or transportation infrastructure
should be built, and governments should grant no new permits for
them.

Some fields and mines – primarily in rich countries – should be
closed before fully exploiting their resources, and financial
support should be provided for non-carbon development in poorer
countries.

This does not mean stopping using all fossil fuels overnight.
Governments and companies should conduct a managed decline of the
fossil fuel industry and ensure a just transition for the workers
and communities that depend on it.

[continued on-line http://www.africafocus.org/docs16/ren1611.php]

***************************************************************

An open letter to the Equator Principles Association

Civil society groups call for stronger climate commitments in EPs
and a halt to financing the Dakota Access Pipeline

By: BankTrack,Friends of the Earth US,others & RAN

For full version, including signatories and references, visit
http://www.banktrack.org/ – Direct URL: http://tinyurl.com/p4pwhpr

Nov 7 2016

[For contact on this letter: johan@banktrack.org)]   To:  Mr. Nigel
Beck, Standard Bank, Chair of the Equator Principles Association,
All Equator Principles Financial institutions (EPFIs)

Concerning:  Equator Principles climate commitments, and EPFI
financing of the Dakota Access Pipeline, for discussion at your
Annual Meeting and Workshop in London

Dear Mr. Beck,

The undersigned organizations are writing to you, as Chair of the
Equator Principles Association, to urge the Association at its
upcoming Annual Meeting in London to address two distinct and
important issues:

* Equator Principles Financial Institutions (EPFIs) must take long
overdue, concrete steps to strengthen their climate commitments.

* Our deep concern about the involvement of a substantial number of
EPFIs in the financing of the Dakota Access Pipeline (DAPL).

[continued on-line http://www.africafocus.org/docs16/ren1611.php]

************************************************************

IEA raises its five-year renewable growth forecast as 2015 marks
record year (Paris)

International Energy Agency 25 October 2016

https://www.iea.org – Direct URL: http://tinyurl.com/h6x3qrc

The International Energy Agency said today that it was significantly
increasing its five-year growth forecast for renewables thanks to
strong policy support in key countries and sharp cost reductions.
Renewables have surpassed coal last year to become the largest
source of installed power capacity in the world.

The latest edition of the IEA’s Medium-Term Renewable Market Report
now sees renewables growing 13% more between 2015 and 2021 than it
did in last year’s forecast, due mostly to stronger policy backing
in the United States, China, India and Mexico. Over the forecast
period, costs are expected to drop by a quarter in solar PV and 15
percent for onshore wind.

Last year marked a turning point for renewables. Led by wind and
solar, renewables represented more than half the new power capacity
around the world, reaching a record 153 Gigawatt (GW), 15% more than
the previous year. Most of these gains were driven by record-level
wind additions of 66 GW and solar PV additions of 49 GW.

About half a million solar panels were installed every day around
the world last year. In China, which accounted for about half the
wind additions and 40% of all renewable capacity increases, two wind
turbines were installed every hour in 2015.

“We are witnessing a transformation of global power markets led by
renewables and, as is the case with other fields, the center of
gravity for renewable growth is moving to emerging markets,” said Dr
Fatih Birol, the IEA’s executive director.

[continued on-line http://www.africafocus.org/docs16/ren1611.php]

*****************************************************

Comparative Analysis: The cost of new power generation in South
Africa

Chris Yelland

Daily Maverick, 9 November 2016

http://tinyurl.com/nbdwh3o

In a presentation dated October 14, 2016, the head of CSIR’s Energy
Centre, Dr Tobias Bischof-Niemz, and Ruan Fourie, energy economist
at CSIR’s Energy Centre, provide a comparative analysis for new
power in South Africa based on recent coal IPP bid price
announcements by Minister of Energy Tina Joemat-Pettersson on
October 10, 2016, and other data.

This study is seen as important for any review of the draft update
to the Integrated Resource Plan for Electricity (Draft IRP)
currently in progress by the Department of Energy (DoE).

The Draft IRP was to have been presented to the Cabinet last week,
and thereafter made available to the public for comment, but this
has since been delayed, with no further dates being given.

Since the previous due date of end March 2016, the request for
proposals (RFP) for the proposed 9.6 GW new nuclear build in South
Africa has also been further delayed from the revised issue date of
end September 2016.

However, it is known that in the meantime various stakeholder
structures reporting to the Minister of Energy are currently
reviewing the Draft IRP and its proposals for new renewable,
baseload coal and nuclear power, and making further input and
recommendations.

The CSIR study shows the significant reduction in the cost of energy
from wind and solar PV generation technologies in South Africa since
submission of bids for Window 1 of the renewable energy IPP
programme (REIPPP) on November 4, 2011, to those of the expedited
round of Window 4 on November 4, 2015.

The result of this reduction is that new power from solar PV and
wind today is at least 40% cheaper than that from new baseload coal
today.

[continued on-line http://www.africafocus.org/docs16/ren1611.php]

*******************************************************

AfricaFocus Bulletin is an independent electronic publication
providing reposted commentary and analysis on African issues, with a
particular focus on U.S. and international policies. AfricaFocus
Bulletin is edited by William Minter.

AfricaFocus Bulletin can be reached at africafocus@igc.org. Please
write to this address to subscribe or unsubscribe to the bulletin,
or to suggest material for inclusion. For more information about
reposted material, please contact directly the original source
mentioned. For a full archive and other resources, see
http://www.africafocus.org

TRUMP AND EVIL
By A. Shaw
Our question is: Is Donald Trump evil?
We may borrow from the writings of Aristotle and Kant their definition of evil.
According to the two writers mentioned above, evil is a state in which a being (either human or divine):
(1) Sees the difference between good and evil and this being CHOOSES the evil principle over the good principle,
(2) This being ACTS in accordance with the evil principle it chooses, and
(3) This being FEELS pleasure when it acts in accordance with the evil principle it chooses.
So, our question, formulated-above, assumes a new form:
Does Trump choose the evil principle over good and does he act accordingly? Further, does Trump enjoy these acts?
If the answer to all three of these questions is YES, then, according Aristotle and Kant, Trump is evil.
In respect to the first of the three questions, Trump sees the difference between good and evil with astonishing clarity. He vividly describes this difference in his speeches. He repeatedly CHOOSES the evil principle over good, especially evil that  involves some  kind of excess.
With respect to the second question,Trump promises to ACT in accordance with his choice of evil if he wins. Since political campaigning in itself is an ACT, we find that Trump acts in accordance with his evil choice of principle.
Does Trump ENJOY the pursuit of the evil principle which he chooses?
Trump enjoys evil, exceedingly.
He’s so jolly when he pursues evil that he often blunders and says things he didn’t intend to disclose, causing anguish for his campaign  for president.
So, let’s return to  our original question:  Is Trump evil?
The answer is “absolutely.”
Trump is evil because he deliberately and joyfully pursues evil.
According to Aristotle, there are five states — evil, brutish, weak, strong, and good.
Some of Trump’s opponents and supporters argue adamantly that Trump isn’t evil, because he is brutish.
According to Aristotle, brutes and evil beings both do evil acts and both claim that evil acts feel good to them. But there is a fundamental difference between brutes and evil beings because brutes cannot see the difference between good and evil. Therefore it is impossible for a brute to choose evil or good. On the other hand, evil clearly sees the difference between itself and good. Hence, Trump isn’t a brute, he’s evil.
Some others argue Trump isn’t evil because he’s only weak.
Unlike both brutes and evil beings, the weak chooses the good principle over evil, but the weak are not strong enough to ACT in accordance with their choice. Trump is a person of prodigious willpower, so he acts in accordance with his choices.
Hence, Trump isn’t weak.
Still others argue Trump isn’t evil, but he’s strong.
The strong choose good over evil and act in accordance with their choice. But they don’t enjoy their choice. They hate their choice and long to do evil acts because they imagine that evil acts are fun. Trump neither chooses good nor does good acts. Hence, Trump isn’t strong but he’s evil.
Still others say Trump is evil because he’s good.
The good chooses good as their principle of action, acts according to their principle, and enjoys it.
Trump hasn’t one thing in common with the good.
Trump is evil.
CONCLUSION
Evil is corruption.
Power corrupts.
When they — Trump and the White House — unite,
Great sorrow.
Who are the Deplorables?
| September 11, 2016 | 11:39 am | Analysis, class struggle, Donald Trump, Hillary Clinton, political struggle | Comments closed

By James Thompson

Could we just exhale for a minute? This electoral cycle has bordered on unleashed barbarism. Insults are flying from both major party candidates for president. The level of depravity of the candidates is unprecedented.

Hillary Clinton, who routinely bashes President Vladimir Putin of Russia and has made this a cornerstone of her campaign, has now painted with a broad brush half of Donald Trump’s supporters as deplorable and irredeemable.

Unless we want a rapid descent into vicious fascism, we should define our terms and understand the implications of what our potential leaders are saying.

First of all, no human being is deplorable. The ideology and behavior of some human beings is deplorable. When a potential leader condemns millions of people, this is highly regrettable. Indeed, some might say that this behavior is deplorable.

Nevertheless, former Secretary of State Clinton seems to have struck a chord and may raise the awareness of the sleeping masses. There is a sizable sector of the people of the US who hold deplorable views and engage in deplorable behavior. She is right, racism, sexism, misogyny, homophobia, xenophobia, Islamophobia are deplorable attitudes stemming from deplorable ideology. Nazism, Fascism, imperialism are all deplorable ideologies. The exploitation of the poor by the rich is deplorable. Police murders of innocent people is deplorable. Chauvinism in all its forms is deplorable. War whose purpose is to increase profits and/or expand global domination is deplorable. It is deplorable when children are denied the basic right to education. It is deplorable when people are denied the basic rights to housing, jobs, healthcare, education and food. It was deplorable when the Nazis slaughtered millions. It was deplorable when the United States dropped the atomic bomb on Hiroshima and Nagasaki. It has been deplorable every time the United States manipulated and started wars in foreign countries to increase US global domination. It was deplorable when the US bourgeoisie supported and financed the rise of fascism in Germany. It was deplorable when the US committed genocide against African-Americans, and Native Americans. It was deplorable when Japanese Americans were put in concentration camps. It was deplorable when the Nazis put trade unionists, socialists, communists, Catholics and Jews in concentration camps and slaughtered them or worked them to death. The blockade against Cuba and the Helms-Burton act are deplorable.

There is a great need for scientific research in this country to study the views and opinions of people. Proper opinion polls should be conducted to determine the percentage of the population that hold these negative views such as racism, sexism, misogyny, homophobia, xenophobia, Islamophobia, etc.

There should also be a massive effort to educate that portion of the population who hold negative views. There should also be a massive effort to combat hate speech and hate crimes through the criminal justice system.

Can Trump be trumped?

By James Thompson

Donald Trump has distinguished himself once again as a consummate racist by attacking an Arizona judge for his Latino heritage. Trump asserts that the Arizona judge from Indiana is prejudiced against him because of his Latino heritage. Immune to shame, Trump further asserts that judges of Muslim heritage would be prejudiced against him as well.

Let’s accept Mr. Trump’s logic for a moment. What’s good for the goose is good for the gander. If a Latino judge or Muslim judge will be prejudiced against an Anglo defendant, then it follows that the reverse is true. This means that an Anglo judge will be prejudiced against Latinos, Muslims, African-Americans and so forth. Also, a judge whose heritage is with the 1% would be expected to be prejudiced against the 99%.

Perhaps Mr. Trump will make it part of his campaign platform to eliminate prejudice in the criminal justice system. Mr. Trump should fight to see that all African-Americans tried by judges prejudiced against them because of their race will be retried and released if found innocent in the retrial. Similarly all Muslims, Latinos, as well as the 99% tried by prejudiced judges should be retried and released if found innocent in a trial by their peers including the judge.

The scary part of all this is that we can easily see how Mr. Trump would run the oval office. He would use the oval office, as he is using his presidential campaign, as a bully pulpit against anyone who disagrees with him or tries to hold him or his class allies accountable.

It’s all about the class war, stupid.