Category: Bernie Sanders
The true cost of war/ Bernie Sanders
| January 2, 2016 | 7:24 pm | Bernie Sanders, political struggle | Comments closed

Iowa, N.H. key to Bernie Sanders’ campaign strategy
| January 2, 2016 | 7:22 pm | Bernie Sanders, political struggle | Comments closed

Iowa, N.H. key to Bernie Sanders’ campaign strategy

http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/elections/2016/2015/12/24/iowa-nh-key-bernie-sanders-campaign-strategy/77844296/

 

WASHINGTON — It could all come down to Iowa and New Hampshire for Sen. Bernie Sanders.

The underdog candidate for the Democratic presidential nomination is counting on momentum from strong finishes in those early contests to help him pull off a gigantic political upset against former secretary of State Hillary Clinton, whose lead averaged 25 percentage points in recent national polls.

Sanders, I-Vt., has invested in staff and resources in states that vote later in the process and, on Tuesday, he became the first presidential candidate to launch a major television advertising blitz in Nevada.

But the campaign acknowledges that, absent wins or close finishes in Iowa on Feb. 1 and New Hampshire on Feb. 9, it will become even harder for Sanders to compete.

“Does Hillary have a serious challenger? That’s really going to be the question that’s answered by Iowa — is the Sanders challenge symbolic or is it serious?” said Tad Devine, Sanders’ senior adviser. “If we do succeed early, and I believe we can, I think we can generate momentum.”

Since Sanders announced his candidacy, he has made 14 trips to New Hampshire and wrapped up his 13th trip to Iowa this week, with plans to travel there again next week. Expectations will be higher for Sanders in New Hampshire, his neighboring state where he has led most polls since August.

“If the New Hampshire program needs something, we definitely get it because it’s essential,” Julia Barnes, Sanders’ director in New Hampshire, said of the campaign’s investment in the state.

Clinton has averaged about a 15 percentage-point lead in recent Iowa polls. But Sanders said on CBS This Morning on Monday that he has a “shot to win in Iowa.” His Monday-to-Wednesday trip drew more than 31,000 to rallies and town meetings, according to the campaign.

“If we can win in Iowa, if we can win in New Hampshire, I think we’re on our way to a national victory and one of the great political upsets in the modern history of America,” he said.

Back-to-back wins may be what it takes to have a shot at overcoming Clinton, but Sanders faces significant challenges.

Clinton has prominent endorsements in both states. In New Hampshire — a state she won during her 2008 primary bid — she has been endorsed by Sen. Jeanne Shaheen, Gov. Maggie Hassan, Rep. Ann Kuster and a lengthy list of state representatives, senators and other leaders.

She began advertising in August — three months ahead of Sanders — and her campaign has spent about $12 million on advertising, while a pro-Clinton super PAC has spent nearly $200,000, according to SMG Delta ad-tracking data reported Tuesday by NBC. The Sanders campaign has spent almost $7.6 million.

Devine concedes Clinton has “real advantages,” including an Iowa electorate that is typically older and a high turnout expectation for women in New Hampshire.

The Sanders campaign hopes to overcome such barriers by expanding the number of young people and others in the political process, as President Obama did ahead of the 2008 primaries. That year, Obama won the Iowa caucuses after a record attendance that nearly doubled the 2004 turnout. Clinton placed third.

Sanders’ volunteers and staff are fanning out, not only at colleges in Iowa and New Hampshire, but at high schools. They said they hope to win support from 17-year-olds, who can participate in the contests if they will be 18 in time for the general election.

“In order for us to prevail, we’re going to have to change things,” Devine said. “We’re going to have to get new people to participate.”

A significantly larger turnout in Iowa would likely work in Sanders’ favor, said Dennis Goldford, a political science professor at Drake University in Des Moines.  If he were to prevent her from capturing 50% of support from caucus-goers, “even if she wins, he’s embarrassed her,” he said.

“It’s not as bad as a loss, but it’s next to a loss,” he said. “It suggests a significant weakness.”

Still, Goldford said, actually winning Iowa will be important for Sanders because it would show “he can win someplace other than his backyard.”

Dante Scala, associate professor of political science at the University of New Hampshire, said Sanders needs to win both to have a credible shot at the nomination. And even then, he said, “I wouldn’t bet on it.”

He said it helps Sanders that New Hampshire colleges will be in session on primary day, Feb. 9, because it’s a lot easier for students to get to polls. But Clinton’s relatively older supporters are a more reliable electorate, he said.

“I don’t see any way to describe Sanders’ lead in New Hampshire as a safe lead,” Scala said.

After Iowa and New Hampshire, Sanders will begin to face more non-white voters, who have largely favored Clinton in polls. He launched Spanish-language radio ads in Nevada along with ads on African-American radio stations in South Carolina, including one that emphasizes his fight to end “institutional racism” and reform the criminal justice system.

The campaign, funded largely by small donations, plans to invest in a 50-state strategy. Barnes said the South Carolina organization is strong, Nevada’s is growing and the campaign is making investments in states that vote in March, as well.

“I don’t anticipate that you’ll see (New Hampshire) be the final stop for us,” she said.

Follow @ngaudiano on Twitter.

Do you actually understand what ‘socialism’ is?
| November 15, 2015 | 3:26 pm | Bernie Sanders, political struggle, socialism | Comments closed

Where is the mass movement to oppose catastrophic war with Russia and China?
| November 10, 2015 | 10:15 pm | Bernie Sanders, political struggle | Comments closed

By James Thompson

Although the peace and justice movement in the United States has done a lot of good for many years and this country would be in much worse shape if there had not been such a movement, we must ask “Where is the peace and justice movement now when the United States is engaged in constant provocative military action around the globe?”

Any rational person can see that the US constantly seeks to provoke and destabilize any country that does not carry out the wishes of the US bourgeoisie. The US military is stretched thin, but provokes both Russia and China on their own borders. It should be pointed out that Russia and China are not engaged in provocative action on US borders.

The US is engaged in military exercises in Europe, Ukraine, the Baltic states, the South China Sea, to name but a few. The U.S. Senate just voted today to send more money to the US imposed fascist government in the Ukraine. Sen. Bernie Sanders was one of three people who voted against the reactionary stupidity of the deranged maggots in the US Senate. The US continues both direct and proxy military action in the Middle East and around the world. One way of thinking about it is that it is like a colony of ants surrounding an Exterminator. When the ants irritate the Exterminator enough, the Exterminator is likely to take action which could prove extremely harmful to the ants.

So, the question remains, “Where is the mass movement to oppose catastrophic war with Russia and China?”

Chomsky on electing the President of an empire
| November 1, 2015 | 6:11 pm | Analysis, Bernie Sanders, political struggle | Comments closed

Richard Wolff: On Bernie Sanders and Socialism
| October 20, 2015 | 9:31 pm | Bernie Sanders, Economy, political struggle, socialism | Comments closed

Know-how and Political Independence
| July 28, 2015 | 9:20 pm | Bernie Sanders, political struggle | Comments closed

By A. Shaw

“This campaign is not simply about electing me, I hope we accomplish that, but that isn’t the most important thing. The most important thing is building a political movement in which millions of people who have given up on the political process, including a lot of young people, get involved,” Senator Bernie Sanders said.
It may follow that a part of the movement is the campaign to elect Bernie. And, it may also follow that another part of the movement is not the Sanders campaign.
But at the current stage, the campaign is more or less the movement. At this stage, without the campaign, there is virtually no movement.
In time, the movement evolves separately from the campaign.
Now, what is the common ground that would unite a movement and campaign?
The common ground seems to be electoral know-how that the campaign now mostly possesses.
Know-how wins or seizes state power while don’t-know-how loses power.
At this stage, the movement has more don’t-know-how than know-how.
In the early stages, the movement depends on the campaign.
As the movement acquires know-how, it separates from the campaign.
When the movement is full of know-how, it’s almost indestructible and almost absolutely independent.
A campaign dies when it wins or loses, like Nov. 2016. The movement however may continue, win or lose.
If the separation of movement from campaign happens before enough know-how enters the movement, the movement may drop dead.
In Nov. 2008, the separation happened before the movement got enough know-how. So, the movement dropped dead as Obama intended.
In the Manifesto, Marx and Engels called know-how “weapons” and they called movement “the working class.” There are four references in the Manifesto to “weapons.”