Month: December, 2014
Top Canadian Union Leaders Urge Release of Three Remaining Prisoners
| December 16, 2014 | 9:25 pm | Cuban Five | Comments closed

http://mltoday.com/top-canadian-union-leaders-urge-release-of-the-five?utm_source=feedburner&utm


 

Hassan Yussuff President / Président
Barbara Byers Secretary-Treasurer / Secrétaire-trésorière
Marie Clarke Walker Executive Vice-President / Vice-présidente exécutive
Donald Lafleur Executive Vice-President / Vice-président exécutif
December 2014
President Barack Obama
The White House
1600 Pennsylvania Avenue NW
Washington, DC 20500

Dear President Obama,

In the last few weeks, the New York Times published a series of editorials and
opinions asking your administration to change its policy toward Cuba. The
centerpiece of this request involves the case of three Cuban men who have
been in U.S. prisons since 1998.

Gerardo Hernández, Ramón Labañino and Antonio Guerrero are part of the
internationally known “Cuban Five” who came to the United States to monitor
the activities of certain groups of Cuban exiles who were responsible for acts of
violence, resulting in the immeasurable suffering of many Cuban families.
Unarmed, the altruistic mission of the Five aimed to save lives and prevent
additional criminal acts against their people, and also against U.S. citizens.

General James Clapper, the current National Director of Intelligence, testified
at their trial that the Five did not damage, nor did they endanger U.S. National
Security. Two of them, René González and González Fernando Llort have
returned to Cuba after serving their entire sentences and the three others
remain in prison to this day.

In the 16 years that have passed since the sentencing, many well-known
personalities, including 10 Nobel Laureates, jurists, intellectuals, artists, trade
union and religious leaders, parliamentarians, governments, human rights
organizations and U.S. elected officials have repeated their calls for the freedom
of these prisoners. Major international bodies such as the UN Working Group
on Arbitrary Detention and Amnesty International have also chimed in with
similar appeals.

Former President Jimmy Carter expressed in 2011: “I believe that the detention
of the Cuban Five makes no sense, there have been doubts expressed in U.S.
courts and by human rights organizations around the world. They have now
been in prison 12 years and I hope that in the near future they will be freed to
return to their homes.”

President Obama, 16 years of this unjust imprisonment is unconscionable.
We have added our voice to those throughout the world who are asking you to
resolve this issue without further delay.

In the spirit of the holiday season, we implore you to use your constitutional
powers to free the three remaining Cuban men and to enable them to join their
loved ones by this New Year; a moving gesture that only a caring President of
the United States can deliver.

Whilst improving the relations between the United States and Cuba, such a
gesture would also enrich the lives of the mothers, wives and children who are
waiting for them.

Sincerely,
Hassan Yussuff
President
nm/cope225

_____________________________________________________________________________________________

2841 Riverside Drive, Ottawa, Ontario K1V 8X7 2841, promenade Riverside, Ottawa (Ontario) K1V 8X7
Tel.: 613-521-3400 Fax: 613-521-4655 www.canadianlabour.ca
Tél. : 613-521-3400 Téléc. : 613-521-4655 www.congresdutravail.ca

Christmas Campaign to Free Ramon, Gerardo and Antonio
| December 16, 2014 | 9:21 pm | Cuban Five | Comments closed

http://mltoday.com/christmas-campaign-to-free-ramon-gerardo-and?utm

Our aim is to urge the president to release them so that they can be home with their families for the Holiday season and the New Year.

We are asking each committee in support of the Five, in their respective countries, to contact personalities who have joined the cause of the Five during these 16 years and ask them to add their names to the enclosed letter.

The letter will be sent to Obama before the Holidays so there is some urgency. The purpose of the campaign is to bring the issue of the Five at a particular time when there is awareness and discussion about the case. There are many new voices asking Obama for their freedom and a fundamental change of policy towards Cuba.

The holidays provide us with a perfect opportunity to push Obama towards a turning point of the struggle for their freedom. We asking you to gather the names of the personalities as soon as possible and begin to send them to the following addresses:

For Spanish-speaking countries: <navidadconlos5juntos@gmail.com> ;

For the rest of the world: <christmastogetherthe5@gmail.com> ;

We only need the names of the personalities, with a brief description of who they are, and the country where they are from.

Time is vital and we must act quickly. Please send us the names of the personalities no later than December 20. We only have a little more than one month to achieve our common goal. Together we can do it.

In solidarity,
Katrien Demuynck, Coordinator of the European Campaign of Solidarity with Cuba
Alicia Jrapko and Graciela Ramírez, International Committee for the Freedom of the Cuban 5
___________________________________________________________________________
Queridos compañeros,
Estamos anunciando una nueva campaña por nuestros tres hermanos presos: “Juntos en Navidad”*, Juntos con sus amadas familias, Juntos en Cuba con su heroico pueblo.

Se trata de que cada comité en sus respectivos países, contacte a las personalidades que se han sumado a la causa de los Cinco durante estos años y siguen sumándose día a día y les pidan su firma a la carta que les adjuntamos.

Esta es la carta que recibirá el Presidente Obama con las firmas de dichas personalidades y es la que ustedes deben compartir con las personalidades que contacten para que estén de acuerdo en sumar sus nombres.

El objetivo de la campaña es incidir en una fecha de especial sensibilidad y un momento crucial de nuestra causa, donde muchas más voces le están pidiendo a Obama un cambio de política hacia Cuba y la libertad de los tres Patriotas cubanos.

Les pedimos que a la mayor brevedad posible consigan las adhesiones de las personalidades y comiencen a enviarlas a la siguiente dirección:

Para los países de habla hispana: <navidadconlos5juntos@gmail.com> ;

Para el resto del mundo: <christmastogetherthe5@gmail.com> ;

Sólo necesitamos los nombres de las personalidades con una pequeña descripción y el país Ejemplo: Adolfo Pérez Esquivel, Premio Nobel de la Paz, Argentina *

El tiempo es vital, debemos actuar con rapidez. Por favor envíennos las adhesiones antes del 20 de diciembre. Solo tenemos un poco más de un mes para lograr nuestro objetivo común.*

En solidaridad,

Katrien Demuynck, Coordinadora de la Campaña Europea de Solidaridad con Cuba
Alicia Jrapko y Graciela Ramírez, Comité Internacional por la Libertad de los 5 Cubanos

Fired Mainland professor settles lawsuit
| December 16, 2014 | 8:45 pm | Analysis, Local/State | Comments closed

Source: Houston Chronicle

News

 

Former teacher was let go after filing two other free speech suits

By Harvey Rice

December 15, 2014 Updated: December 15, 2014 9:29pm

GALVESTON – The College of the Mainland has settled a lawsuit with a professor it fired after he filed two other lawsuits alleging violation of his free speech rights.

The settlement is the latest in a long string of federal lawsuits against the college board and administration over the last several years by faculty, staff and students.

The lawsuit settled last week by former professor David Michael Smith accused the board of directors of firing him on Aug. 1, 2013, on a unanimous vote in retaliation for his two previous free speech lawsuits.

College President Beth Lewis said Smith was fired for insubordination and for harassing his colleagues.

Neither Smith nor Lewis would discuss the terms of the confidential settlement. Smith declined to say whether he would be reinstated, but said he had no plans for full-time teaching.

Smith’s lawsuit sought $750,000 in damages plus attorneys fees of at least $250,000.

Smith, who taught political science at the community college for 15 years, predicted more lawsuits unless the administration and board agreed to work cooperatively with employees and students.

“I’m certain there will be additional lawsuits,” Smith said. “If you ask me, I’m afraid the current board is intent on turning a traditionally progressive institution of higher learning into a Walmart.”

Lewis dismissed Smith’s accusation that the administration was unwilling to tolerate dissent from employees and students. “There is no merit to this assertion,” she said.

Board member Ralph Holm refused comment, but board member Rachel Delgado said that there would be fewer problems with Smith’s departure. “I feel that we are developing a very positive relationship” with faculty and staff, she said.

She also declined to discuss the settlement’s terms.

Smith, as head of the faculty union, was at the forefront of disputes over policy affecting college employees, often arguing points of policy before the board. His outspokenness and liberal viewpoints earned the ire of conservatives as expressed in letters to the editor of the Galveston Daily News.

His first lawsuit was filed after he and his wife were prevented from addressing the board during the public comments section of a June 22, 2009, meeting. The college settled the lawsuit after a federal judge accepted a recommendation that the college board be barred from excluding members of the public from speaking during the public comment portion of public meetings.

Smith sued the college again in June 2011 claiming that he was issued a disciplinary letter in retaliation for the first lawsuit. The college settled after the judge found that a jury was likely to side with Smith, according to Smith’s lawsuit.

Two years later, the college’s letter terminating Smith said that an investigation “has revealed a pattern of behavior in which you routinely challenge directives and requirements from your supervisors,” the lawsuit states.

Smith’s view is backed by Lee Medley, president of the AFL-CIO Galveston County Labor Council, who has at times tried to intercede on behalf of college faculty. Medley said Smith’s firing is part of an attempt by the college to break the faculty union.

Stephanie Macaluso, who graduated last week with an associates degree from Mainland College, said that she encountered problems defending a different professor fired last year for mentioning faculty problems in the classroom. Macaluso said faculty have told her that they fear expressing viewpoints contrary to the administration’s.

CLINTON VERSUS SANDERS FOR DP NOMINATION
| December 16, 2014 | 8:40 pm | Analysis, Bernie Sanders, National | Comments closed
by A. Shaw

“According to the Monmouth Polling Institute, when asked to name who they would like to see as the next Democrat nominee for president, nearly half (48%) of Democrats and Democratic le aning voters volunteer Hillary Clinton. No other candidate registers in double digits. Massachusetts Senator Elizabeth Warren is named by 6%, independent Vermont Senator Bernie Sanders is named by 2%, and Vice President Joe Biden is named by 2%,” PoliticusUSA reports Dec. 16.

 

CLINTON

 

No doubt, Hillary Clinton is very happy with Monmouth results.

 

People say if it isn’t broken, don’t fix it.

 

The almost 50-point Clinton lead in the poll shows it isn’t broken.

 

So, there’s no way Clinton is going to fix it.

 

The Democratic Party (“DP”) has reactionary ( at est. 30%), liberal (65%), and centrist sectors (5%). The reactionaries in the DP are Clinton’s most loyal supporters.

 

At the moment, Clinton doesn’t publicly identify with any of three sectors. This ideological non-identification is the “it” referred to above.

 

She doesn’t say anything nice about reactionaries because it will irritate liberals. And vice versa. She doesn’t say anything nice about centrists, because it may confuse both reactionaries and liberals.

 

Clinton now is more cunning than she was in 2008 when Obama outflanked her on the left during race for the nomination.

 

SANDERS

 

Bernie Sanders repeatedly says very nice things about liberals who with an est. 65% constitute the mass of the DP.

 

Clinton’s strategy of non-identity so far has kept the liberals from flocking to Sanders or Elizabeth Warren.

 

Warren says she’s not going to run. But she will instantly change her mind if Sanders shrinks Clinton’s big lead.

 

Remember 1968, RFK said he wasn’t going to run. But as soon as McCarthy shrunk LBJ’s big lead, RFK jumped into the race.

 

If Sanders can’t shrink Clinton’s big lead, Warrern most likely will stay out of the race.

 

To shrink Clinton’s big lead, Sanders has to distinguish himself from Clinton’s Wall Street, neo-liberal, and laissez faire economics.

 

Sanders also has to clearly distinguish himself from Pres. Obama who has developed a habit of capitulation to reactionaries in the DP and GOP on budgetary and other fiscal matters

BOURGEOIS REGIME IN USA ATTACKS DEMOCRACY AGAIN
| December 15, 2014 | 10:21 pm | Analysis, International, Latin America, National, Venezuela | Comments closed
By A. ShawCastro Maduro Morales
Both houses of the US Congress last week passed a bill, which Pres. Obama promises to sign, imposing sanctions on Venezuela.
The sanctions deny visas to certain Venezuelans seeking to visit the USA and the sanctions seize their assets, if any, in the USA.
The main lie used as a pretext to get the bill passed was that the Venezuelan government “repressed” protesters who called for unconstitutional ouster of democratically-elected officials. In Feb. 2014, the protesters tried to force democratically-elected government officials out of office by blocking big streets with overturned cars that the protesters set afire. The street barricades caused traffic jams that sometimes involved as many as fifty thousand vehicles.
The bourgeois regime in Washington DC and the lying “cappie” media throughout the USA praised the street barricades as “peaceful” even after 40 people had been killed trying to remove or defend the barricades and this regime and media also denounced   as “repression”  any effort by Venezuelan government to clear the streets of barricades. (“Cappie,” by the way, stands for capitalist or pro-capitalist. Cappie is used to convey the same courtesies as the term “Commie.”)
This monstrous bourgeois state in DC secretly distributed over a million dollars to protesters, especially to the protest leaders, to keep the protesters in the street.
Virtually the whole  bourgeois media in the USA — reactionary, moderate, and liberal — was unable to stop lying in a futile effort to make the law-breaking protesters look good.
After several months, the protesters got tired of sleeping, eating, and urinating in the streets, so the protesters went home to do these things, giving the pristine democracy in Venezuela a huge and undeniable victory over lawless  protesters and their US imperialist allies. (“Pristine” because the Carter Center in Atlanta, GA, which has  supervised elections in over a hundred countries, says “Venezuela has the best electoral system in the world.”)
The US bourgeoisie was outraged that Venezuelan protesters quit after taking large bribes.
Vindictive in the extreme, the bourgeois regime under Obama decided to punish the Venezuelan Government for its successful defense of democracy against imperial intrigue.
Hence, the sanctions.
Why did the bourgeois-democratic regime in the USA stir up mercenary protesters?
Everywhere in the world, the aggressive regime in the USA attacks democracies and other forms of government to disrupt or interrupt or reverse a passing of state power to the working class, even where the proletarian state has a pristine democratic form. US imperialists don’t want workers in power under any circumstances, anywhere.
The  regime in the USA is a democracy with a bourgeois content or, in other words, a democracy in which representatives of the bourgeois class chiefly exercise state power and in which these representatives exercise power chiefly for the benefit of the capitalist class.
At this time, the regime in Venezuela is also a democracy with a bourgeois content. It’s a bourgeois state in a democratic form.
But in Venezuela, unlike in  the USA, a revolution is taking place.
“Revolution is a passing of state power from one class to another,” according to Lenin.
When power passes to the capitalist class or, more concretely, to elected representatives of the capitalist class, it’s a bourgeois revolution and a bourgeois state may emerge.
When power passes to the working class or, more concretely, to elected representatives of the working class, it’s a proletarian revolution and a proletarian state may emerge.
These representatives are elected by the Venezuelan electorate.
In Venezuela, a proletarian revolution is taking place in accordance with constitutional principles and democratic institutions. A concrete example, like Venezuela, of a passing of state power to the working class that accords with constitutional principles and democratic institutions is extremely relevant to the class struggle in the USA.
Perhaps, one day more of the US Left will discover this relevance.
So far in Venezuela, not enough state power has passed to the working class for a proletarian state to emerge although it evolves. Maybe something like 35% of state power has already passed to the working class. That’s nowhere near enough.
The power of elected public offices, including the presidency, is grossly overrated. Hugo Chavez discovered in 2002 how overrated his power was when the standing army kidnapped him. The bourgeoisie is connected to the bureaucracy and standing army by  “thousands of threads,”  Lenin says. It takes time and a lot of work to sever “thousands of threads.”
At least, about 51% of power must pass before a proletarian state begins to emerge.
Some observer-participants of various ideological and political trends more our less concur that the pace of the passing of state power in Venezuela from the bourgeoisie to the working class has picked-up of late.
President Maduro vows to speed up the passing of power even more in early 2015.
This pick-up in pace terrifies US imperialists who will intensify their aggressive and animal attacks on evolving proletarian democracies.hugo-chavez
Union Leader Santos Crespo Sends Letter to Obama in Support of the Five
| December 15, 2014 | 10:07 pm | Cuban Five | Comments closed

Posted on by ICFC5

This page is also available in: Spanish

Santos Crespo Santos Crespo is the President of Local 372 since June 2011. Local 372 represents nearly 25,000 Department of Education employees who provide essential support services to the 1.1 million children – and their families – in New York City public schools.  Local 372 members, who are sometimes referred to as “non-pedagogical” employees because they are non-teaching staff, work in the cafeterias handling food and monitoring children in schoolyards to ensure their safety, in classrooms providing anti-violence/gang and drug prevention counseling, in homeless shelters to ensure that parents send their children to school despite living in a shelter, on trucks bringing supplies to the schools. Local 372 is the largest union within DC 37, which is the largest municipal union in New York City.

May 5, 2013

President Barack Obama

The White House

1600 Pennsylvania Avenue NW
Washington, DC 20500

Dear President Obama,

As a worker and life time union leader who has lived by the motto, “An injury to one is an injury to all”, I am asking you to take the moral high road towards justice by releasing the Cuban 5 who are serving shocking long sentences in U.S. prisons. As you know these five Cuban men — Gerardo Hernandez, Antonio Guerrero, Ramon Labañino, Fernando Gonzalez and Rene Gonzalez came to this country to monitor the activities of anti Cuban terrorists in Miami. They came unarmed with no intention of harming the people or security of the U.S. but rather to protect their own island nation; what could be nobler. As a compassionate person you not only have the power but the responsibility to reunite them with their families in Cuba.

The labor movement around the world has had the opportunity to meet the family members of the Cuban 5 and is taking action to build a movement for their freedom. The labor movement in Canada is making the case of the Cuban 5 a political priority including the Steelworkers, Food and Commercial Workers and Postal Workers. And of course throughout Latin America and the Caribbean, the injustice done to these men is well known and an example of the breech between your administration and our neighbors in the Southern hemisphere.

With great enthusiasm our union movement contributed our brains, energy and finances in supporting both of your election campaigns. Latinos and workers in general voted for you in record numbers and here in the U.S. we are beginning to reach them about this case. The loud but shrinking voices from Southern Florida do not speak for us in the labor movement. It is becoming clearer that the majority of people even in Florida want normalization of relations with Cuba and you yourself have said that improving relations with the people of Latin America is important to your presidency. One small thing you could do to get that desire started is to free the Cuban 5 now.

Sincerely,

Santos Crespo

President Local 372

Press Conference – Houston Socialist Movement
| December 14, 2014 | 8:53 pm | Action, Analysis, Immigrants' Rights, Local/State, National | Comments closed