Category: National
Wake Up America!
| March 7, 2015 | 10:04 pm | Analysis, Economy, National | Comments closed

The Real Unemployment Rate: In 20% Of American Families, Everyone Is Unemployed

Tyler Durden's picture

Submitted by Michael Snyder of The American Dream blog, According to shocking new numbers that were just released by the Bureau of Labor Statistics, 20 percent of American families do not have a single person that is working.  So when someone tries to tell you that the unemployment rate in the United States is about 7 percent, you should just laugh.  One-fifth of the families in the entire country do not have a single member with a job.  That is absolutely astonishing.  How can a family survive if nobody is making any money?  Well, the answer to that question is actually quite easy.  There is a reason why government dependence has reached epidemic levels in the United States.  Without enough jobs, tens of millions of additional Americans have been forced to reach out to the government for help.  At this point, if you can believe it, the number of Americans getting money or benefits from the federal government each month exceeds the number of full-time workers in the private sector by more than 60 million. When I was growing up, it seemed like anyone that was willing to work hard could find a good paying job.  But now that has all changed.  At this point, 20 percent of all the families in the entire country do not have a single member that has a job.  That includes fathers, mothers and children.  The following is how CNSNews.com broke down the numbers… A family, as defined by the BLS, is a group of two or more people who live together and who are related by birth, adoption or marriage. In 2013, there were 80,445,000 families in the United States and in 16,127,000—or 20 percent–no one had a job. To be honest, these really are Great Depression-type numbers.  But over the years “unemployment” has been redefined so many times that it doesn’t mean the same thing that it once did.  The government tells us that the official unemployment rate is about 7 percent, but that number is almost meaningless at this point. A number that I find much more useful is the employment-population ratio.  According to the employment-population ratio, the percentage of working age Americans that actually have a job has been below 59 percent for more than four years in a row… Employment Population Ratio 2014 That means that more than 41 percent of all working age Americans do not have a job. When people can’t take care of themselves, it becomes necessary for the government to take care of them.  And what we have seen in recent years is government dependence soar to unprecedented levels.  In fact, welfare spending and entitlement payments now make up 69 percent of the entire federal budget.  For much more on this, please see my previous article entitled “18 Stats That Prove That Government Dependence Has Reached Epidemic Levels“. And what is even more frightening is that more families are falling out of the middle class every single day.  As a recent CNN article explained, approximately one-third of all U.S. households are living “hand-to-mouth”.  In other words, they are constantly living on the edge of financial disaster… About one-third of American households live “hand-to-mouth,” meaning that they spend all their paychecks. But what surprised the study authors is that 66% of these families are middle class, with a median income of $41,000. While they don’t have liquid assets, such as savings accounts or mutual fund holdings, they do have homes and retirement accounts, with a median net worth of $41,000. “We don’t expect them to be living paycheck to paycheck,” said Greg Kaplan, study co-author and assistant professor of economics at Princeton University. The American Dream is rapidly becoming an American nightmare. When I was growing up, I lived in a pretty typical middle class neighborhood.  Everyone had a nice home, a couple of cars and could go on vacation during the summer.  I don’t remember ever hearing of anyone using food stamps or going to a food bank.  In fact, I can’t even remember anyone having a parent that was unemployed.  If someone did leave a job, it was usually quite easy to find another one. But today, the middle class is being ripped to shreds and according to one new report there are 49 million Americans that are dealing with food insecurity in 2014. How can anyone not see what is happening to us?  America is in the midst of a long-term economic decline, but the mainstream media and most of our politicians seem to think that things are better than ever.  They continue to try to convince us that “business as usual” is the right path to take. But one-fifth of the families in the entire nation are already totally unemployed. At what point will we finally admit that what we are doing right now is simply not working? 30 percent of all families unemployed? 40 percent? 50 percent? If we stay on the road that we are on now, things are going to continue to get worse.  Millions more jobs will be shipped overseas, millions more jobs will be replaced by technology and crippling government regulations will kill millions more jobs.  The middle class will continue to shrink and government dependence will continue to rise. Most people just want to work hard, put food on the table, pay their mortgages and provide a nice life for their families. But the percentage of Americans that are successfully able to do that just keeps getting smaller. Wake up America.
PCUSA salutes international working women’s day: March 8, 2015
| March 7, 2015 | 9:30 pm | National, political struggle, Women's rights | Comments closed

Party of Communists USA Salutes International Working Women’s Day: March 8, 2015

http://nymetrocommunistparty.org/?p=879

  The PCUSA honors the contributions working women have made internationally to our society; not just as white or blue collar workers, but also as agricultural workers, homemakers and mothers. We use this day to affirm our commitment to fighting capitalist exploitation. From the dawn of the industrial revolution, women were forced to work longer hours for less pay just because they were women. In many cases, locked inside the factories they worked in with little to no safety regulations. In fact, March 25th commemorates the deadly Triangle Shirtwaist Fire of 1911, where 146 garment workers, nearly all women died because they were locked inside the building, which was then common. As early as 1857, women in the garment industry were demanding shorter work hours, equal pay, and safer and better work conditions. Today in 2015, little has changed. Women still are not paid equally for equal work and many women around the world still work in factories with little or no safety regulations. For example, the 2012 on the sweatshop fire in Dhaka, Bangladesh, over 111 female garment workers died from being locked in an unsafe factory. AFL-CIO_comp_time_bill Although many important and crucial gains were made during the late 1960’s and 1970’s in the US because of the militancy of the women’s rights movement, such as the right to enter the workforce, the rights of women to control their bodies and reproduction; the movement did not completely liberate women. Everyone has heard the expression: “A woman’s work is never done”. This statement is true in the US now more than ever. Whereas before women had one job, now they were saddled with two. One paid outside the home and the other unpaid inside the home after and before work; taking care of housework, the children, and often also their elderly parents.

Many American households consist of single women with children who receive no child support, so issues of low pay, long hours, chronic under and unemployment and lack of social services, such as child care are especially critical. To this day, women only earn 77 cents for every $1 a man makes. Although children are tomorrow’s wage slaves in a capitalist society, Capitalism does everything possible to make the labor behind childcare and housework invisible in order to get this labor for free. It does the same when it extracts labor from workers when they take care of sick relatives and parents, which should be a burden to the government. Women, rather than being respected and assisted, are heavily penalized in our society. They generally are delegated to what are considered “women’s work”: jobs in such fields as domestic work, home healthcare, as cashiers, store clerks, etc. These jobs usually pay little more than minimum wage.

Even when they do work in jobs that are not considered “women’s jobs”, they earn less than men for the same work and therefore receive less social security when they retire because they earned less. They are also doubly exploited because, unlike most men, women tend to be the primary caregivers in our society. If they did not work, because they were tending to sick children or parents, they are disqualified from receiving social security. If they did work, they receive less social security, because of the time they may have taken time off working on these unpaid jobs. Women also tend to be discriminated against by the lack of legislation requiring paid sick days in order to take care of sick children or relatives. Women should not be penalized for being mothers or caregivers. Moreover, there should be nothing more dignified in any society than being a caregiver or helping others. This has always been a primordial instinct in man. There is no reason why being a home healthcare aide should be a woman’s job, except that women are paid less than men, so women are hired instead of men for these jobs. There is also no reason why men should not take paternity leave or sick days to take care of children, except that they will be fired later for doing so. There is also no reason why war is glorified rather than taking care of your sick neighbor, except that capitalism profits from war, but not from taking of the elderly or disabled. We need to fight not only for equal pay for equal work; but most importantly for Socialism. Only under Socialism will everyone be entitled to a job, equal pay, and most importantly be respected for taking care of the family as a social function.

Response to: “Two different approaches in fighting Ebola”
| March 3, 2015 | 7:14 pm | Africa, Analysis, Cuba, Ebola, International, National, political struggle | Comments closed
By A. Shaw
For clarity, the two different approaches may be called the US imperialist approach and the Cuban proletarian approach.
Imperialist Approach in Fighting Ebola
The Obama regime, which sent about 2,800 military troops to West Africa in October, has announced an end to its Ebola relief mission. Most US soldiers have already returned. The troops did not treat a single patient, much less save a single life. Obama proclaimed the American response to the crisis ( a response which came after months of pleading by international relief groups)  “an example of American leadership.” The Obama regime lists among its accomplishments training 1,539 health care workers & support staff (presumably non-technical and cursory); creating 10 Ebola treatment units (which you could count on your fingers); and constructing a 25-bed medical unit (for a country [Liberia] that has had 10,000 cases of Ebola). Obama regime declares that “the United States has done more than any other country to help West Africa respond to the Ebola crisis.” The regime clearly helped facilitate the delivery of equipment and supplies, but its claims that the U.S. has done more than any other country are dubious. By the end of April, all but 100 U.S. troops will have left West Africa while other countries will extend the presence of their relief workers.
The U.S. response did involve several hundred millions of dollars, which is, indeed, more than most countries contributed. But U.S. personel played mostly a supporting role, collaborating with other actors in the tangential aspects of the crisis. U.S. government employees were not directly involved in treating any patients. Their role was rather to help other health workers and officials on the front lines who actually did. To say this supporting role of the Obama regime is an example of U.S. “leadership” is a vast embellishment.
So much for the imperialist approach to fighting Ebola.
Now, let’s look at the proletarian approach of the Cubans.
The other country who has taken a very public role in the Ebola crisis is Cuba. Unlike the U.S., Cuba sent nearly 500 professional healthcare workers – doctors and nurses – to treat African patients who had contracted Ebola. Before being deployed to West Africa, all the Cuban doctors and nurses completed an “intense training” of a minimum of two weeks, where they “prepared in the form of treating patients without exposing themselves to the deadly virus,” according to CNN. After Cuba announced its plan to mobilize what Cubans call the “army of white robes,” WHO Director-General Margaret Chan said that “human resources are clearly our most important need.” “Money and materials are important, but those two things alone cannot stop Ebola virus transmission,” she said. “We need most especially compassionate doctors and nurses” to work under “very demanding conditions.” The European Commission for humanitarian aid and crisis management last week also “recognized the role Cuba has played in fighting the Ebola epidemic.”
 MATT PEPPE , the author of this excellent article, reminds us not to forget that behind its humanitarian pretensions, the U.S. military is a worldwide instrument of aggression, oppression and exploitation.
“U.S. troops are used as props. What may sound like a massive effort is little more than propaganda. The idea is to associate troops with humanitarianism, rather than death, destruction and torture. In reality, one doctor can save more lives than hundreds of soldiers. A true humanitarian mission would be conducted by civilian agencies and professionals who are trained and experienced specifically in medicine, construction and administration, not by soldiers trained to kill and pacify war zones” Peppe says.
Houston Socialist Movement: Rally against Republicans!

You can view the videos of the Rally against Republicans held on 2/28/2015 in Houston which was organized by the Houston Socialist Movement at the following links:

http://youtu.be/eH5gteUx_HQ

 

http://youtu.be/dQZmH5LH-ug

 

http://youtu.be/55MI956srIc

 

http://youtu.be/SugVZPSzoJE

 

http://youtu.be/NeqoRM8X2d4

 

http://youtu.be/HekqSmY0QHw

 

http://youtu.be/CKpvEzZOm-Q

Response to “Sanders Moves Into Top Tier Of The Chase”
| February 26, 2015 | 8:12 pm | Analysis, Bernie Sanders, National, political struggle | Comments closed
By A. Shaw
So, Sanders replaces O’Malley in the fourth slot, according to US News & World Reports.
Last May, O’Malley was fourth and Sanders tenth. Today it’s almost the exact reverse. But silly people still say O’Malley is more “viable” than Sanders.
Although Sanders has only 5%, he is “Clinton’s leading rival,”  according to US News & World Reports
Warren with 7% isn’t running. Biden with 15% is a clown or a buffoon who will hold on to his 15 points only as long as he makes people laugh. So, that leaves only Clinton with 48 points and Sanders with 5% in the top tier.
Momentum is building and it is with Sanders.
Sanders tactics are ” paying off with a portion of the hard left,”   according to US News & World Reports.
It’s interesting that Sanders doesn’t have all of the hard left, just a “portion” of it. What is the other portion doing? Evidently, the soft left is still begging Warren to run. But Warren doesn’t want to run.
Sanders, Rubio Move Into Top Tier of The Chase
| February 26, 2015 | 8:06 pm | Analysis, Bernie Sanders, National, political struggle | Comments closed

Chris Christie loses momentum, while Bernie Sanders becomes the prime alternative to Hillary Clinton.

By David Catanese    
Sanders Up, O’Malley Down

On the Democratic side, Sen. Bernie Sanders, I-Vt., replaces former Maryland Gov. Martin O’Malley in the fourth slot.
Sanders has been out making the most aggressive case for a progressive alternative to front-runner Hillary Clinton, and it’s paying off with a portion of the hard left. He’s only taking about 5 percent of the Democratic primary vote nationally, but that’s enough to “have a little bit of separation from the bottom tier that could make him Clinton’s leading rival,” according to Public Policy Polling.
Since he hails from neighboring Vermont, New Hampshire is where Sanders best performs – NBC/Marist tracked him at 13 percent there, when not including Massachusetts Sen. Elizabeth Warren, who has repeatedly said she’s not pursuing a 2016 campaign.
O’Malley, on the other hand, had less than 1 percent of support in the poll.
The former governor has been effectively frozen out by traditional donors, staff and interest groups waiting for a Clinton candidacy. That’s left him stalled in neutral for most of the last year.
Sanders, on the other hand, has been making a more direct appeal to the liberal heart of the party, if still shying away from taking on Clinton herself.
The independent has said he’ll announce a final decision on a 2016 campaign sometime in March.
Response to “People are really getting angry”: How Bernie Sanders just electrified Iowa
| February 26, 2015 | 7:59 pm | Analysis, Bernie Sanders, National, political struggle | Comments closed
By  A. Shaw
 “Bernie Sanders just electrified Iowa,”  the  article says.
 Yeah, and he’s going to electrify Iowa again and again until 2016
 “His issues are their issues, and if anything, they are more pissed off than he is,” the article says.
 In contrast, Clinton’s issues are her issues.  Clinton’s issues are another country to invade and occupy, more tax breaks for big corporations and less regulation of the crooks on Wall Street.

“Our government  is bought and paid for by the Koch brothers, and we are living in an oligarchy,”   Bernie Sanders says.
The State in the USA is a government of the Koches, by the Koches, and for the Koches. The GOP is the favorite brothel of the Koches. The DP is the second farvorite.
“We … better pay attention and get off our asses,” the Bernie Sanders warns.
We better get off ours asses before the Koches and other democracy-hating reactionaries kick the shit out of us.
In time, Bernie will electrify the USA.