Category: Bernie Sanders
War powers resolution goes too far!
| February 15, 2015 | 7:21 pm | Analysis, Bernie Sanders, International, National | Comments closed

Response to: “An opening for Elizabeth Warren if she wants it”
| February 12, 2015 | 8:28 pm | Analysis, Bernie Sanders, political struggle | Comments closed
By A. Shaw
DP Pollster Douglas Schoen writes:
Telephone interviews with 400 likely caucusgoers in Iowa and 400 likely primary voters in New Hampshire, conducted Jan. 13-15, suggest that Ms. Warren is already considerably more competitive than national polls suggest. In a head-to-head Clinton-Warren matchup in Iowa, Mrs. Clinton ran 15 points ahead of Ms. Warren, at 51%-36%. Surprisingly, caucus-voting Iowa Democrats already appear to be thoroughly familiar with the Massachusetts senator, and well-disposed toward her, with a 75%-7% favorability rating. Mrs. Clinton has great favorables, too: 93%-6%.But Mrs. Clinton’s favorables don’t appear to make her invulnerable to a populist challenge from the left, as a Warren campaign would almost certainly be.”
A drop in  Clinton’s frontrunner status  makes all of the top contenders — Biden (15%), Warren (7%), and Sanders (5%) –  “more competitive.”
Warren says she isn’t a contender or even a future candidate. So, who — either Biden -or Sanders — gets her seven points? Sanders is a lot more similar to Warren than Biden. So, most likely, Warren’s seven points should be imputed to Sanders until the contenders announce their candidacy in March.
The results of Douglas Schoen’s “head-to-head” matchup between Clinton and Warren don’t demonstrate Warren caused Clinton’s developing crack-up.
Most likely, Clinton’s cracking-up mainly results from either Clinton herself with something like 38% in Iowa or Biden with 15% or Warren with 7% or Sanders with 5%. or a mix of these.

 

Stand with Senator Bernie Sanders: Make secret trade agreements public
| February 6, 2015 | 9:46 pm | Action, Analysis, Bernie Sanders, Economy, National, political struggle | Comments closed

http://act.credoaction.com/sign/Bernie_Sanders_TPP?

 Stand with Senator Bernie Sanders: Make secret trade agreements public

Republicans in the new Congress have already launched a backdoor attack against Social Security and moved to gut Wall Street reforms with more bailout for big banks. And now they are working with the Obama administration for the next big item on their agenda – a titanic corporate power grab called the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP).

We need to fight now to ensure the American public, which has purposefully been kept in the dark about the TPP, knows exactly what is in it.

Fortunately, Senator Bernie Sanders is fired up. He is championing the public interest by demanding the Obama Administration make public the content of all trade agreements such as the TPP.1 And, this is a key moment for us to stand with him.

Tell President Obama: Make the full text of all pending trade agreements public.

Trade agreements such as the TPP are being negotiated behind closed doors by the governments of a dozen countries (including ours) in collusion with corporate interests. This secret “trade” deal would eviscerate broad swaths of regulations that protect consumers, workers, the environment and the soundness of our financial system. And it would set up a legal regime where corporate profits trump the policy priorities of sovereign governments.

Under a trade agreement such as the TPP, more American jobs would be offshored. Internet freedom would be a joke. Developing countries would lose access to lifesaving medicines. Unsafe foods and products could pour into our country while we’re powerless to stop them. Gone would be the days when the United States could regulate coal exports. The excesses of our crazy intellectual property laws that privilege corporate control over innovation would be both exacerbated and extended internationally. And, that’s just the tip of the iceberg.

Soon congress will be taking up “Fast Track” legislation which would short-circuit the typical legislative process when trade deals like the TPP come up for a vote. In fact, the reason the corporate lobby is pushing hard for Fast Track is that they know the TPP could not get through Congress without this extraordinary power grab.

You might think a far-reaching proposal such as the TPP would be subject to intense public debate. But the text of the proposed deal is considered classified by our government and even members of Congress have been given extremely limited access to it.

The little we do know about the deal we know because drafts of some of its chapters were leaked last year.

Yet, while the government has kept the public and Congress largely in the dark about the TPP, it has given 600 corporate advisers access to the full text of the proposal. As Senator Sanders has demanded, President Obama’s trade negotiators must “stop operating in the shadows and come clean with details of an agreement.”2

Tell President Obama: Make the full text of all pending trade agreements public.

Senator Elizabeth Warren has warned that trade deals like the TPP could provide an opportunity for “banks to get something done quietly out of sight that they could not accomplish in a public place with the cameras rolling and the lights on.”3

Indeed, leaked chapters of the TPP included provisions that would majorly hamstring the ability of governments to stem the next banking crisis.4

Other provisions would allow multinational corporations to sue governments in foreign courts that are staffed by corporate lawyers when governmental regulations cut into corporate profit.5

It would be outrageous for the Obama Administration to allow the Republican leadership and their corporate allies within the Democratic party to ram through Fast Track, without allowing all members of Congress, their staff, and the American public to read what is in trade agreements such as the TPP.

This is why Senator Sanders is demanding the Obama administration to at least follow the example of the European Union which has already published the full text of a separate proposed trade agreement with the United States.6

Stand with Senator Sanders by demanding President Obama to immediately release the full text of all pending trade agreements.

Thank you for speaking out. Your activism matters

  1. Senator Bernie Sanders’ letter to United States Trade Representative, January 5, 2015.
  2. Senator Bernie Sanders’ press release, “Sanders Contrasts U.S. Trade Secrecy to EU Transparency,” Sanders.senate.gov, January 7, 2015.
  3. Kate Davidson, “Elizabeth Warren: Trade talks could weaken bank oversight,” Politico, May 8, 2013.
  4. Zach Carter, “Obama Faces Backlash Over New Corporate Powers In Secret Trade Deal,” Huffington Post, Dec. 08, 2013
  5. Ibid.
  6. Senator Bernie Sanders’ press release, “Sanders Contrasts U.S. Trade Secrecy to EU Transparency.”
How DP and GOP big shots see the DP primary race
| February 6, 2015 | 9:37 pm | Analysis, Bernie Sanders, National, political struggle | Comments closed
A. Shaw
The establishment caste of  both of the bourgeois parties, DP and GOP, are going crazy over the probable presence of Sen. Bernie Sanders in the DP presidential primary.
Democratic Party ( the “DP”)
Why are the privileged strata of the two bourgeois parties going crazy over Sanders’ candidacy?
Some of the DP big shots made this observation about the DP primary race “Sanders could do relatively well in liberal Iowa and neighboring N.H. and embarrass Clinton, with no long-range damage.”
The DPs love to BS, such as when they say “Sanders could do relatively well in liberal Iowa and neighboring N.H.  and embarrass Clinton.”
Clearly, the DP big shots know that Sanders is going to beat Clinton in Iowa and N.H. So, the DP big shots try to belittle the significance of Clinton’s early defeats. The big shot DPs claim that early defeats of Clinton  will not cause “long-range damage” to Clinton’s campaign.
This is BS. These early defeats will destroy Clinton’s campaign.
THE GOP
The GOP big shots resemble the DP big shots when the former pretend that Clinton’s defeats in early primary states, like Iowa and N.H., are not important.
Some GOPs said “Her biggest problem is in the White House, not Iowa or New Hampshire.”
These asinine GOPs pretend that Clinton can get to the White House without winning early primary states.
CONCLUSION
If Clinton stumbles early in the race for the 2016 DP presidential nomination, she will most likely fall further and further behind the frontrunners.
The opinions of DP and GOP big shots are worthless because only two months ago these big shots were absolutely
certain that Clinton had these early primary states in her purse.
Bernie Sanders is right to be outraged
| February 6, 2015 | 8:57 pm | Analysis, Bernie Sanders, Economy, National | Comments closed

 

http://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/dana-milbank-bernie-sanders-is-right-to-be-outraged/2015/01/30/d5f17576-a886-11e4-a06b-9df2002b86a0_story.html

By Dana Milbank Opinion writer January 30

Bernie Sanders is in his natural state – of agitation.

It’s just 9 a.m., but the socialist senator, contemplating a presidential run as a Democrat or as a populist independent, is red in the face and his white hair askew. In a conference room at The Washington Post, he’s raising his voice, thumping his index finger on the table and gesturing so wildly that his hand comes within inches of political reporter Karen Tumulty’s face.

“We are living in the United States right now at a time when the top one-tenth of 1 percent own more wealth than the bottom 90 percent,” the Vermont lawmaker says in his native Brooklyn accent.

Bernie Sanders Storms The Supreme Court to Stop the Koch Brothers Theft of Democracy
| February 2, 2015 | 7:11 pm | Bernie Sanders, political struggle | Comments closed
http://www.politicususa.com/2013/10/08/bernie-sanders-storms-supreme-court-stop-koch-brothers-theft-democracy.html

Tuesday, October, 8th, 2013, 5:28 pm

At a rally outside the Supreme Court, Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-VT) took on the Koch brothers and said, “Freedom of speech does not equal freedom to buy the United States government.”

Video:

Sen. Sanders said,

In the long history of our country people have fought and died for democracy. Democracy means one person, one vote. The fact that all of us have the opportunity to be involved in the political process to stand up for what we believe in. Three years ago, or so the Supreme Court decided that corporations are people. They decided that through independent expenditures billionaires could spend unlimited sums of money to impact elections.

Let me say one word to you right now about how relevant that is. As all of you know, the government of the United States shut down. Hundreds of thousands of workers are suffering, millions of people are not getting the services they need. Right now, as we speak, in the House of Representatives there are people who are being threatened that if they vote for a clean CR to open the government without destroying the Affordable Care Act then huge sums of money will be spent against them in the next election.

We are living in a society where a handful of people with incredible sums of money, folks like the Koch brothers and others, are undermining what this democracy is supposed to be about. The bottom line here is that if we do not want to move this nation to an oligarchic form of society where a handful of billionaires can determine the outcome of these elections, then it is imperative not only that we overturn Citizens United, but that we put a lid on how much people can contribute in elections.

Freedom of speech, in my view, does not mean the freedom to buy the United States government

Sen. Sanders was present at the Supreme Court to hear oral arguments in the case of McCutcheon vs. FEC. The Supreme Court will deciding the fate of the caps that limit how much donors can give to candidates and political organizations during a two year election cycle later in this term.

If the Supreme Court rules the caps unconstitutional, it will allow conservative billionaires to spend even more money in their attempt to execute a hostile takeover of the United States government.

The case is so dangerous to our democracy that President Obama weighed in on it today. The president called for spending limits in our elections, and spoke about the role that the conservative billionaires have played in shutting down the government.

Sen. Sanders is fighting the good fight, and if Americans want to know why the government is shutdown, all they have to is follow the money. Government shutdowns are bad, defaults are worse, but these tactics are nothing compared to the damage that the current Supreme Court is doing to our democracy.

Response to “Bernie Sanders Files A New Constitutional Amendment to Overturn Citizens United”
| January 21, 2015 | 8:48 pm | Bernie Sanders, National, political struggle | Comments closed
By A. Shaw
Bernie Sanders, unlike the rotten majority of judges on the US Supreme Court, believes money is not the US Constitution.
Power corrupts, especially when you buy it.
When democracy is bought and sold, citizens become the mere chattel of the buyer.
The rotten and treacherous majority of judges now sitting on the US Supreme Court held in Citizens United that money is free speech. So, the venal majority argues, a limit on money is also a limit on free speech. And a limit on free speech violates the First Amendment.
So,  five out of nine judges conclude, the government of the people, by the people, and for the people is up for sale to the highest bidder.
Bernie Sanders, by constitutional amendment or legislative struggle, fights to restore the U.S. Government to the U.S. people.
The USA is the US people under the Constitution. This the true essence of the USA.
Citizens United  turns the USA into US people under the cash flow.