Category: Bernie Sanders
Sanders, Rubio Move Into Top Tier of The Chase
| February 26, 2015 | 8:06 pm | Analysis, Bernie Sanders, National, political struggle | Comments closed

Chris Christie loses momentum, while Bernie Sanders becomes the prime alternative to Hillary Clinton.

By David Catanese    
Sanders Up, O’Malley Down

On the Democratic side, Sen. Bernie Sanders, I-Vt., replaces former Maryland Gov. Martin O’Malley in the fourth slot.
Sanders has been out making the most aggressive case for a progressive alternative to front-runner Hillary Clinton, and it’s paying off with a portion of the hard left. He’s only taking about 5 percent of the Democratic primary vote nationally, but that’s enough to “have a little bit of separation from the bottom tier that could make him Clinton’s leading rival,” according to Public Policy Polling.
Since he hails from neighboring Vermont, New Hampshire is where Sanders best performs – NBC/Marist tracked him at 13 percent there, when not including Massachusetts Sen. Elizabeth Warren, who has repeatedly said she’s not pursuing a 2016 campaign.
O’Malley, on the other hand, had less than 1 percent of support in the poll.
The former governor has been effectively frozen out by traditional donors, staff and interest groups waiting for a Clinton candidacy. That’s left him stalled in neutral for most of the last year.
Sanders, on the other hand, has been making a more direct appeal to the liberal heart of the party, if still shying away from taking on Clinton herself.
The independent has said he’ll announce a final decision on a 2016 campaign sometime in March.
Response to “People are really getting angry”: How Bernie Sanders just electrified Iowa
| February 26, 2015 | 7:59 pm | Analysis, Bernie Sanders, National, political struggle | Comments closed
By  A. Shaw
 “Bernie Sanders just electrified Iowa,”  the  article says.
 Yeah, and he’s going to electrify Iowa again and again until 2016
 “His issues are their issues, and if anything, they are more pissed off than he is,” the article says.
 In contrast, Clinton’s issues are her issues.  Clinton’s issues are another country to invade and occupy, more tax breaks for big corporations and less regulation of the crooks on Wall Street.

“Our government  is bought and paid for by the Koch brothers, and we are living in an oligarchy,”   Bernie Sanders says.
The State in the USA is a government of the Koches, by the Koches, and for the Koches. The GOP is the favorite brothel of the Koches. The DP is the second farvorite.
“We … better pay attention and get off our asses,” the Bernie Sanders warns.
We better get off ours asses before the Koches and other democracy-hating reactionaries kick the shit out of us.
In time, Bernie will electrify the USA.
“People are really getting angry”: How Bernie Sanders just electrified Iowa
| February 26, 2015 | 7:53 pm | Analysis, Bernie Sanders, Economy, National, political struggle | Comments closed

Source: Salon

DES MOINES — Bernie Sanders has neckties older than most of his audience at last Friday’s Drake University Town Hall in Des Moines. Yet the age differential didn’t matter. His college-age audience loved him. Organized by Drake progressive students, Sanders and his audience seemed to have a near telepathic connection. His issues are their issues, and if anything, they are more pissed off than he is.
Several Drake students set the stage for Sanders in brief topical introductions, laying waste to money in politics, Citizens United specifically, the reality and dangers of climate change, the importance of pay equity for women, immigration reform, and the crushing burden of the cost of college and debt. Then Bernie nailed it, touching on all of these topics and more.
Unlike the speeches at the recent Republican Iowa Freedom Summit, Sanders was long on ideas, and short on chest-thumping, fiery rhetoric. He also didn’t have an audience mostly old enough to vote when Ronald Reagan was running for president.
At first it was unclear who the bigger enemy of the people were to Sanders — the Kardashians or the Koch brothers.  The Kardashians, or rather our public fascination with them, represents America’s apathy. Sanders was clear that nothing progressive can happen until people start paying attention.  Sanders told his audience that Americans are getting screwed, and that we had better pay attention and get off our asses.
According to Sanders, our government is bought and paid for by the Koch brothers, and we are living in an oligarchy. He illustrated the point by reminding us of the recent announcement that the Kochs plan to spend $900 million on the next presidential election, when Obama and Romney each spent approximately $1 billion in 2012.  He feels that soon, they will have more power than either the Democratic or Republican parties, just because of their wealth and the leverage the 5-4 Supreme Court Citizens United decision gave them and other billionaires.
The question and answer session took an interesting turn when a stocky young man with the voice of a broadcasting major asked Sanders, “Will you run for president in 2016?”
If he had asked, “Are you going to run…” Sanders might have responded differently. “I don’t know yet,” would have been a good answer. But since he was asked, “Will you run…” Sanders apparently heard it as a request for him to run.
“That’s a good question that you’ve asked,” Sanders said.  “Let me throw it back to you… do you think there is the support in this country?”  To which the young man replied, “ I think I do. I do. I think there is the support out there … people are really getting angry about this income inequality, climate change…we’re tired of it.”
Hands continued to be raised, and Sanders pushed the question with each of them. Is the support out there for a progressive candidate? One man said, “I think people are ready for a champion…if you are a champion for our issues, people will follow you.” One woman had driven four hours to see Sanders, and assured him the support is there. One by one all agreed that they would support a progressive candidate.
Interestingly, Sanders hadn’t asked if they would support him specifically; his question related to a progressive candidate in general. Will Iowa support a progressive candidate? The crowd says yes.
My own assessment is a slightly more guarded yes. Currently a purple state, Iowa has deep progressive roots. Not many states match its history on civil rights. Early in our history we granted assistance to those fleeing slavery, enacted some of the nation’s earliest civil rights laws and were one of the first states that allowed unmarried women to own property. In addition, the University of Iowa was the first state university in the nation to open its degree programs to women, and Iowa was the first state in the nation to elect a woman to a public office, and allow women to belong to the bar association. More recently, Iowa was among the first states to allow gay marriage.
And of course, Barack Obama — seemingly more progressive as a candidate than he turned out to be as president — won the Iowa caucuses in 2008.
Iowa’s early settlers focused on education, and as a result, we have a higher education system that provides a great starting point for any progressive candidate. Iowa has three state universities, and few, if any, other states have as many private colleges per capita. Drake is one of them, and there are 24 others. Sanders is doing it right. His visits over the past few days have included Iowa City, the home of the University of Iowa, and Story County, the home of Iowa State University, as well as Drake.
Sanders is making the case for change, saying that while most Republicans are working to increase tax breaks for the wealthy and large corporations, they deny the role humans play in climate change, and are working to cut Social Security, medicare, Pell grants and nutrition programs. His audience knows this — they share his perspective that the Republican Party and billionaires are destroying our country.
There was an energy in the room that constituted a shared vision, and a mission to bring about change. While it was clear that Sanders wants a progressive president, it was equally clear that he is reluctant to seek the nomination. I have no doubt that everyone who spoke at the Republican Iowa Freedom Summit wanted to be president. I think Sanders would be happy if someone else took on the progressive mantle, and led the fight for change.
Sanders spoke of the enormousness of the task to take on big money and bad ideas.
He stressed that real change only comes with struggle.  He said, 30 years ago, sitting in this room, no one could have imagined an African-American president. Likewise, 30 or 40 years ago no one could have imagined so many women in Congress, in law, the armed services, or medicine. Even 10 years ago, he said, no one could have possibly imagined gay marriage in conservative states. He made his point clear that while we still have a long way to go with respect to race and gender relations, America has made great strides.
However, Sanders added, there is one place where we have not gained — but lost — ground: the economic struggle. He says we need to bridge that income gap, where working families can earn a decent living, where healthcare is a right, where students can afford an education no matter how much money their parents have, and where we don’t have people living on the street.
Bernie Sanders is not only a reluctant candidate, but an unlikely one. The self-described democratic socialist may drive other candidates to the left, and that may be his goal. I suspect that should he choose to run, however, that no matter the inherent value of his ideas, he will be tarred with the “socialist” brush by his opposition somewhere during the campaign. The problem here is that the Tea Party pejorative “socialist” will be used and interpreted by an American public who hates “socialism,” without even knowing what the word means.
The question is whether Iowa, for all its proud progressive tradition, will give a candidate like Sanders a real look in the 2016 caucuses. His town hall on Friday was a positive start.
Robert Leonard covered the 2008 and 2012 Iowa caucuses for KNIA/KRLS Radio in Knoxville and Pella, Iowa. He is an anthropologist, and author of “Yellow Cab.”
Response To “It’s Time We Believed Warren. She’s Not Running.”
| February 22, 2015 | 4:19 pm | Analysis, Bernie Sanders, National, political struggle | 1 Comment
by A. Shaw
So, according to the article, Elizabeth Warren is the choice of “progressives” because she warns us about the threat to democracy posed by the concentration of capital in the hands of a small group of people. Apart from Bernie Sanders, the article alleges, no other high-profile politician warns us about this threat to democracy. But Warren is not running and it’s time to accept that fact. Last week, Warren and Clinton met before the big bourgeois media so that Warren could effectively endorse Clinton, attempting to lead Warren’s supporters into Clinton’s camp. Warren didn’t decide against running, the article argues, because Clinton has a big lead in the polls and a lot of money. Warren isn’t scared of Clinton, the article finds.Warren decided against running because she simply isn’t interested in the presidency, the article concludes.
When the article finds that Warren isn’t running, it stands on solid ground. But when the article speculates about Warren’s motive for not running, it skates on thin ice.
What is the likely effect caused by Warren’s decision not to run?
Recent polls in Iowa and NH average out as follows:
Clinton …… 38%
Biden……….15%
Warren …….  7%
Sanders ……  5%
Clinton leads Warren by 31 points in the chart above.
But in a head-to-head Clinton-Warren matchup in Iowa, Clinton ran 15 points ahead of Warren, at 51%-36%, a Jan 13-15 poll by Douglas Schoen shows.
The 15 point difference between the poll of the field and the poll of the head-to-head matchup implies that there is something illusory about Clinton’s big lead. We saw something like this in 2008 when Clinton suffered a meltdown after holding a big lead for over a year.
Who gets the mass of Warren’s 7% now that Warren is out?
Clinton’s appeal to Warren’s 7% rests mainly on Warren’s implied endorsements of Clinton even though Clinton says little or nothing about the threat to democracy posed by the concentration of capital.
Biden seems to have very little appeal to Warren’s “progressives.”
Sanders appeals to Warren’s “progressives” because he and Warren talk about the same things in the same way. But Clinton has to expose herself as laissez faire and a warhawk before the whole country takes a real close look at Sanders.
Most likely, the mass of the electorate will go for Sanders.
It’s Time We Believed Warren. She’s Not Running.
| February 22, 2015 | 4:12 pm | Analysis, Bernie Sanders, National, political struggle | Comments closed
Saturday, February, 21st, 2015
Source: PoliticusUSA
Sure, the thought of Sen. Elizabeth Warren running for President of the United States got me excited there for awhile. Warren is a progressive’s progressive, and I’ve said before right here on PoliticusUSA that in many ways this woman is my hero. Anyone who isn’t afraid to go toe-to-toe with the big banks in the way that she has is someone who deserves a monument erected in their honor right on the front lawn of the White House. Or maybe even a great big cast iron middle finger stretching toward the sky on Wall Street. Warren has identified and doggedly challenged the same threat to democracy that Teddy Roosevelt took on at the turn of the 20th century when  he made it his business to bust the trusts. All that power and influence in so few greedy little hands was  perhaps the biggest threat to the sustainability of democracy during Teddy Roosevelt’s time, and now here we are over a century later caught in that same trap. And the only high-profile politician making any real noise about this threat, apart from Bernie Sanders, has been Elizabeth Warren.
So sure. How could I not get excited that someone like this would run? Hell, after being alive to witness the election and two-term presidency of Barack Obama, I don’t know if my poor widdle heart would be able to withstand all that joy to follow up eight years of President Obama with another eight of President Warren. It would have been a blast to watch her use Jeb Bush for firewood during the debates.
But Warren is not running. It is not going to happen, and I think it’s time to accept that fact. As my colleague Jason Easley pointed out in his post earlier this week, if Warren had any intentions of running then it’s highly unlikely she would have accepted Hillary Clinton’s personal invitation to come on by the house and chat awhile. I think it’s safe to say they probably weren’t knitting. Clinton wanted to get Warren’s ideas, but she also wanted to clear the field and broadcast the none-too-subtle message nationwide that Warren will not be a factor, nor does she want to be. Warren is not being bullied because, well, good luck with that one. Warren is being courted, and she is being asked in as polite a way as possible if she wouldn’t please oh please mind playing the role of team player for Team Hillary. And by accepting Hillary Clinton’s invitation – combined with every other flaming denial she has issued time and time again – she effectively said that this was fine with her. If there could be a headline attached to that meeting between the two, it could have been, “Warren to Hillary: I’m not your roadblock.”
Because in the end this doesn’t come down to how far ahead the polls say Hillary is over Warren at this early stage of the game because it doesn’t even matter. Hillary hasn’t even formally announced and Warren has done everything short of shoot her supporters in the face to convince the electorate that she’s sitting this one out. So exactly how reliable could such a poll be? Warren wasn’t scared away by those polls any more than she was scared away by the money behind Hillary. It takes more than that to scare Warren. Warren is kinda like Omar in “The Wire” once she sets her sights on something; Warren don’t scare.
What this is about is Warren really not being interested in the presidency, possibly because she doesn’t want the massive headache and has never really had designs on running an entire country, but also because she believes she’s more effective where she is right now. What this is about is acknowledging Hillary’s glaring shortcomings – at least to progressives – but then looking around the room to see who else we (realistically) got. What this is about is acknowledging that not only is Hillary a far better option than any Republican candidate, she just might make a really good president.
Books Instead Of Bombs: Bernie Sanders Proposes Massive College Tuition Cut
| February 19, 2015 | 9:53 pm | Bernie Sanders, National, political struggle | Comments closed

Thursday, February, 19th, 2015
Source: PoliticusUSA
Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-VT) tonight a plan to take some of the proposed increases in military spending and spend it on a 55% cut in tuition for students at all public colleges and universities.
Sen Sanders’s will announce his proposal during a town hall at the University of Iowa:
“If the federal government were to invest $18 billion a year, with a dollar-for-dollar match from state governments, we would slash college tuition in the United States by more than half.
Many of my colleagues in Washington would look at that number – $18 billion a year – and tell you that we can’t afford to make that kind of
investment in our nation’s young people. To put it simply, they are wrong.
In the budget proposal President Obama released two weeks ago, he requested $561 billion for the Department of Defense – $38 billion over budget caps that are currently in place.
If we were to reduce the President’s proposed increase in military spending by less than half, and instead invest that money in educational opportunities for today’s college students, we could cut tuition by 55%. So I challenge all of you… ask yourselves, where should our priorities lie?”
The Pentagon doesn’t need all of the proposed increases in military spending. There is a lot of military spending that is nothing more than red state welfare programs disguised as national security.
The country needs lower college tuition costs more than it needs a few billion dollars thrown at the Pentagon. This is a proposal that makes sense, but Republicans will definitely oppose it by claiming that it is too expensive.
The GOP would rather see a nation of college graduates drowning in debt, and the doors of economic opportunity bolted shut before they would consider doing anything to lower the cost of tuition.
Sen. Sanders has a powerful common sense message to offer. The fact that the issue of the cost of higher education is being discussed is serious progress. The Republican motto of you’re on your own isn’t going to cut it.
Bernie Sanders for president – really
| February 15, 2015 | 7:30 pm | Analysis, Bernie Sanders | Comments closed

http://thehill.com/blogs/pundits-blog/presidential-campaign/232706-bernie-sanders-for-president-really