Month: November, 2013
Maine writer explains support for the Cuban Five
| November 12, 2013 | 10:09 pm | Action | Comments closed

Defenders of the Cuban Five in Maine mounted a display for these political prisoners at the Common Ground Fair held in Unity, Maine September 20-22. Revolutionary Abby was on hand at the table and she talked about the Five with fairgoers. A friend heard about that and had a question for her. Maine people recognize Revolutionary Abby as novelist Carolyn Chute, who writes about poor people in rural Maine.Defenders of the Cuban 5

Dear Revolutionary Abby,

We’ve been reading your columns for ages and notice how you cheer for whistleblowers, such as Bradley Manning and Edward Snowden and the Cuban 5.

My neighbor, a highly successful big bank fellow, remarked that no American should cheer for commies like the Cuban 5. Communists are bad, he said, unless it’s China which is really fascist because it has combined huge biz and centralized government (for keeping workers in line) so it makes lots of opportunities for USA and USA – friendly investors. He said capital needs to flow.

He wasn’t a bit impressed when I told him how the Cuban 5 were these real Cubans sitting in on private terrorist groups in Florida, private groups of sulking Cuban Americans, some of whom have plotted and killed innocent people, including a planeful of seventy three people, one a soon-to-be-born baby!!! Meanwhile, the all holy USA government looks the other way!!! The Cuban 5 were whistleblowing on these terrorist creeps.

But then, as you know, this WEIRD thing happens!! The U.S. government which says “terrorism is EVIL,” repeating it a thousand times a day over and over and over until we are all dizzy, arrested the Cuban 5 as spies – and let the terrorists go!!!

Three of the Cuban 5 got LIFE sentences. If they’d been from Israel and a few other places, they would have gotten a few moments in jail.

Abby, what gives with our government!!?

Yours, Skeptical in Skowhegan

**********************************

Dear S. S.,

Well, you said the answer yourselvezums. Let’s back up to when your powerhouse neighbor said that about making lots of opportunities for hot shot investors, that capital needs to flow. Did your neighbor really use the word “fascist?” He probably used a more honeyed term than that but meaning the same. But between you and me who see through the honey, the thing behind all of today’s political mysteries is “Full Spectrum Dominance.” The lords and ladies of capital and the spooks and Pentagonians and loud fibby, smiley, mainstream media critters work together to someday, at last, balance the entire globe in the palm of their hand, like a tender tomato.

And remember this; the Cuban 5 are human beings. But Full Spectrum Dominance is a conscienceless hi-tech humming system which has taken on a vivid lifelikeness of its own. The lords and ladies and spooks and such benefit, but really nobody is in charge. When us little people with conscience throw even the teensy weeniest monkey wrench in the works, a great maw opens, and the bravest and decentest of souls stand on the precipice.

Yeah, I’m rooting for the Cuban 5!! Oh, S. S., that you and I should be that brave!

Yours forever in truth, Revolutionary Abby

October 18, 2013

More discussion of the article “Lies concerning the history of the Soviet Union.”
| November 11, 2013 | 8:45 pm | Action | 1 Comment

Letter to the editor

After Stalin’s death, Khrushchev took the Soviet economy and society in a direction away from socialism. He put the economy and society in reverse, split the international communist movement, and in doing so, vilified Stalin. So this is a discussion that we must have. If we are truly communist, then we must face the truth. We must admit that for his own political ambition, it was Khrushchev and not Stalin that deviated from the communist path. Because there has been so much anti-communist propaganda in our country, some of us have fallen victim to it, and have repeated the lies of the Trotskyites and others. We must properly explain the ideas of Marx, Engels, Lenin and Stalin. That is our job.

Joe Hancock                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                    Los Angeles, California

Dennis Kucinich speaks in Houston
| November 10, 2013 | 8:40 pm | Action | 1 Comment

HOUSTON – Dennis Kucinich received the 11th annual Peacemaker Award from the Houston Peace and Justice Center on 11/9/2013. He also delivered the keynote address which you can watch on http://youtu.be/o4rGCKFzn9k  . The event program states the reason he received this award: “For courage, inspiration and tenacity; for the hope your life has given to all who care deeply about shifting from a system based on greed to one of generosity; for caring enough to highlight important topics in political debates thereby giving voice to issues that affect most Americans, including standing up against banks as early as the 1970s; for consistently elevating peace and justice issues throughout your life of service; for truly representing the best interests of the American people and the world, and for energizing others to join you.”

Dennis Kucinich is a former U.S. House of Representatives Congressperson from Cleveland, Ohio. He led the opposition to the invasion of Iraq and co-authored landmarkDSC00011

Dennis Kucinich speaks in Houston on 11/9/13.

Dennis Kucinich speaks in Houston on 11/9/13.

legislation on Universal Health Care. Watch the video linked above and hear him discuss these and other timely issues.

PHill1917@comcast.net

Stephen Kimber Speaking Engagements
| November 10, 2013 | 1:22 pm | Action | Comments closed

Wednesday, November 13, 7 pm: DePaul University, Schmitt Academic Center, Room 154. 2320 N. Kenmore Avenue, Chicago
(with Alejandro Molina of the Puerto Rican Cultural Center speaking on the long-held Puerto Rican political prisoner Oscar Lopez);

Thursday, November 14, 12 noon: Northwestern University School of Law, 375 E. Chicago Ave., Chicago

Thursday 14 November 7pm: University of Wisconsin/ Milwaukee Union bldg,, Room 240, 2200 E. Kenwood Blvd, Milwaukee

Friday, November 15, 9 am: University of Illinois/Chicago [UIC], Rafael Cintron Ortiz Cultural Center, Room LC-B2, 403 S. Morgan St., Chicago [between Harrison and Taylor, Morgan and Halsted] with Jan Susler of the Peoples Law Office.

Review of Stephen Kimber, “What Lies Across the Water: The Real Story of the Cuban 5”
By Stan Smith, Chicago Committee to Free the Cuban 5
http://mltoday.com/stephen-kimber-what-lies-across-the-water-the-real-story-of-the-cuban-5?utm

Stephen Kimber has written a book about the Cuban 5 that catches you like a detective story. The book also presents previously unknown information about the case, even for those campaigning for their freedom. The Cuban 5 are political prisoners who were arrested in 1998, tried in Miami on “conspiracy” charges – for which concrete evidence is not needed – and sentenced to long prison terms (one is now released and back in Cuba).

Cuban undercover agents, working to thwart terrorist and assassination attempts against Cuba “were also the heart and soul of what was regarded, even by its enemies, as the best organized and the most effective intelligence network in the world.” (p. 49) These agents were carefully recruited, with little pay, doing the work because they believed in the revolution.

The Cuban 5 concealed their identities, and some infiltrated anti-Cuban terrorist groups in Miami, passing as bona fide right-wing Cuban exiles. Some Cuban agents also informed on Miami terrorist groups to the FBI, operating as double agents. The Miami Cuban right wing themselves knew their dirty work was made much more difficult because they were heavily infiltrated by Cuban agents.

Most US people are not aware of the case of the Cuban 5 because the US corporate media has maintained a news blackout on the case – except in Miami, where it launched a smear campaign. In a recent rare exception, the Washington Post published an October 4 op ed by Stephen Kimber:

“Consider for a moment what would happen if American intelligence agents on the ground in a foreign country uncovered a major terrorist plot, with enough time to prevent it. And then consider how Americans would react if authorities in that country, rather than cooperate with us, arrest and imprison the U.S. agents for operating on their soil. Those agents would be American heroes today. The U.S. government would move heaven and Earth to get them back. This sort of scenario has occurred, except that, in the real-life version, which unfolded 15 years ago last month, the Americans play the role of the foreign government, and Cuba – yes, Fidel Castro’s Cuba – plays the role of the aggrieved United States.” (http://articles.washingtonpost.com/2013-10-04/opinions/42719570_1_exile-cuban-agents-u-s-agents)

The Cuban 5 were tried in Miami, where the US government admitted in other cases before and after this trial, that when the issue concerned Cuba, a fair trial was impossible. They were convicted of “conspiracy” charges and sentenced from 15 years to two life terms plus 15 years. Their defense during their trial largely rested on stating they were doing what the US government should have done, but didn’t: prevent violations of American neutrality and international laws by infiltrating, uncovering and stopping attacks against Cuba by Miami terrorist groups. Five other Cuban agents arrested with them on September 12, 1998 cooperated with US authorities in return for lesser sentences of 3 ½ to 7 years.

Kimber reveals that by the summer of 1996, the FBI knew Geraldo Hernandez was a key Cuban agent, as on September 11,1996 the FBI broke into his apartment and copied the contents of his computer and over 200
In a telling display of how the US “free press” operates, the Cuban 5 case was covered daily in Miami, while outside Miami existed – and still exists – a virtual news blackout on the case. And in Miami the government actually paid journalists over $250,000 to write newspaper articles to whip up a climate in Miami against Cuban “spies.” (http://www.freethefive.org/journalists.htm)

Kimber notes in 2005 the United Nations Human Rights Commission described their trial as unfair ( http://www.thecuban5.org/vos_un.html) , as did Amnesty International in 2010. (http://www.amnesty.org/en/library/asset/AMR51/096/2010/en/e628a0eb-868e-4768-808c-9ac139b089f0/amr510962010en.pdf)  In 2005 the three-judge panel of the US 11th Circuit Court of Appeals overturned their convictions, stating their trial was “a perfect storm of prejudice and hostility,” and unanimously ordered a new trial. (http://www.walterlippmann.com/cubanfive-11thcircuit.html)
This was later overturned by the full appeals court. When the case was appealed to the Supreme Court, the Obama administration petitioned the court not to take it up. It didn’t.

After the Cuban revolution, the CIA recruited and trained rightwing Miami Cubans for actions against Cuba. The most infamous included Orlando Bosch and Luis Posada Carriles (who blew up the Cubana airliner in 1976), Felix Rodriguez, who killed Che Guevara, and Jorge Mas Canosa, who later founded the Cuban American National Foundation (CANF), which in spite of being a tax exempt foundation, has bankrolled numerous bombing and other terrorist actions against Cuba.

The CIA training of rightwing Miami Cubans in bomb-making and sabotage was not directed only at Cuba. In the 1970s a bombing campaign was unleashed against political opponents in Miami. During a period of one and half years, there were more than 100 bombings and an average of one assassination a week in Miami. The FBI described Miami as the “terrorist capital” of the US.

Human Rights Watch issued a report on the lack of freedom of expression in Miami. It documented 20 years of “bombings, vandalism, beatings, death threats and other examples of violence and harassment directed mostly against politically moderate exiles.” (p.66) It singled out Jorge Mas Canosa the head CANF. The report also said “government officials maintain a conspicuous silence in the face of threats to free expression.” ( p.66), and concluded that local, state, and national, leaders had “failed” to protect the First Amendment rights of Miami’s moderate exile community. Four years later this same city was chosen as the venue for the Cuban 5 trial.

But besides Cuba and Miami, the likes of Bosch, Posada and Felix Rodriguez were involved in terrorist acts against fighters for social justice in Latin America. For instance, Orlando Letelier and Ronnie Moffat, opponents of the Pinochet military regime in Chile, were killed by a car bomb in Washington DC. Felix Rodriguez helped Posada Carriles escape from prison in Venezuela, where he was held for blowing up a Cubana airliner, killing 73 civilians. Rodriguez had Posada flown to El Salvador, where he worked with the Nicaraguan contras in the 1980s aiming to overthrow the revolutionary Sandinista government. In the 1990s, rightwing Miami Cubans were involved in some attacks on the Pastors for Peace caravans to Cuba.

US War On Cuba

After the Soviet bloc collapsed, the US government expected Cuba (and North Korea) to quickly follow suit. Under President Clinton, the Torricelli and Helms-Burton laws were passed tightening US economic blockade. Cuba had sought to gain foreign exchange by turning to tourism, which prompted the CIA and Miami Cuban terrorist groups to resort to bombings in Cuba to scare away tourists in a new attempt to sabotage the economy. It was in this context that the Cuban 5 went undercover in Miami.

Just as we easily overlook the real damage to Cuba by the US blockade, we also easily lose sight of the actual terrorist war being waged against Cuba by the US, though this terrorist war never reached the level it did in the 1960s.

There were a series of bombing attacks and assassination attempts on Cuba while the Cuban 5 were in Miami, a number of which Cuban agents disrupted. In 1993 Posada planned to blow up a Cuban freighter in Honduras. In 1994, Rodolfo Frometa, the leader of an exile group, was nabbed in an FBI sting trying to buy a Stinger missile, a grenade launcher and anti-tank rockets that he said he planned to use to attack Cuba. That year Posada led a team of 6 Cuban exiles to kill Fidel Castro at a summit in Cartagena, Colombia.

In 1995, Cuban police arrested two Miami Cubans after they tried to plant a bomb at a resort in Varadero, Cuba. Anti-Cuba terrorists also attempted to blow up a Havana’s Tropicana nightclub, with enough c-4 explosives to kill several hundred in the audience, as well as bomb a thermoelectric plant.

Jose Basulto, founder of Brothers to the Rescue, planned to launch remote-controlled planes loaded with explosives against Cuba to explode at a public rally in Plaza de la Revolucion. This scheme was scratched after Cuba shot down two of their planes in February 1996.

In late spring and summer 1997 Posada organized a major bombing campaign to disrupt tourism to Cuba, its chief source of foreign exchange. Those working with Posada planted bombs at the Melia Cohiba on two occasions, the Commodore Hotel, Hotel Nacional, Hotel Capri, Copacabana Hotel, Hotel Miramar, Sol Palmeras, La Bodeguita del Medio (Hemingway’s hangout). In October 1997 attacks were planned on hotels, a tourist minbus, and at Jose Marti airport, but these were thwarted. The same year a Cuban travel agency in Mexico City was bombed. That year the Cuban 5 helped to disrupt an assassination plot on Fidel Castro in Margarita, Venezuela.

The Cuban government later said the 1997 bombing campaign cost them $181 million in lost tourism and $80 million in extra security.

In 1998 Miami terrorists tried to place bombs on civilian airplanes heading to or from Cuba. Two were arrested while smuggling explosives to Cuba to be left on an airliner parked at the Havana airport. Bomb attacks on a power station in Matanzas, and on the Che mausoleum in Santa Clara were also successfully disrupted.
Fidel Castro wrote to President Clinton in 1998, “The American investigation and intelligence agencies are in possession of enough reliable information on the main people responsible. If they really want to, they have the possibility of preventing…this new modality of terrorism.” (p. 185)

Role of US Terrorist Groups in Government Policy

Kimber’s book gives a hint of the behind the scenes workings of the real forces running the US government, though he does not bring this out explicitly. While FBI agents were fulfilling a professed function of the agency by monitoring Miami Cuban paramilitary terrorist groups engaged in bombings, assassinations and drug running, and arresting them when justified, higher level agents were making sure nothing serious was done to endanger these groups’ activities.

For instance, Kimber quotes a July 23, 1998 Miami Herald article, “Anti-Castro militant Tony Bryant still chuckles when he recalls the FBI agents who interviewed him after a 14-foot boat, loaded with high explosives and registered in his name, turned up near Havana. They said, ‘You could hurt someone. Don’t do it again.’ ‘I promised not to do it again, and they went away.’” (p. 208)

Kimber quotes Posada Carriles, the mastermind behind most of the bombings, in an interview he gave: “As you can see, the FBI and the CIA don’t bother me.” (http://www.nytimes.com/1998/07/12/world/a-bombers-tale-taking-aim-at-castro-key-cuba-foe-claims-exiles-backing.html?pagewanted=all&src=pm)  Posada noted his “close friendship” with high-ranking officials in the agencies.

As if in confirmation, while FBI agents collected extensive files on Posada’s criminal activities, the head of the Miami FBI, Hector Pesquera, in 2003, shredded five boxes of files on Posada, including documents concerning cash transfers to Posada. Pesquera claimed Posada had “disappeared from sight and was out of action.” Yet this was exactly when Posada, jailed in Panama, was awaiting trial for attempting to kill Fidel Castro by blowing up the building full of university students he would be addressing. Posada, at the time, had already been visited by the US Embassy’s FBI liaison there. (p. 226) This bomb plot had also been uncovered by undercover Cuban agents.

As head of the Miami FBI, Pesquera was the one who devoted FBI resources to uncovering and framing up the Cuban 5. While doing so, the men who carried out the September 11, 2001 attacks were training right there in Miami, under the nose of Mr. Pesquera, totally undisturbed.

In another example of how higher ups in the US government protected rightwing Miami gangsters, Miami Cuban group member Hector Viamonte was arrested and convicted, in part by Rene Gonzalez’ information, of conspiracy to import and distribute 3000 pounds of cocaine, yet received a mere 9 years in prison. This was 6 years less than Rene Gonzalez received, 15 years, for “conspiracy to act as a non- registered foreign agent,” and is lighter than what many small scale street corner drug dealers receive.

In the fall of 1995 and early 1996, just before Cuba shot down two Brothers to the Rescue planes, killing four, Richard Nuccio, Clinton’s point man on Cuba, asked the FAA to warn Jose Basulto not to provoke Cuba with more Brothers to the Rescue overflights. Nuccio is quoted saying a senior FAA official “rebuffed our concerns and said if they happen to run into him, they would mention it….[Basulto] was already quite annoyed and they didn’t want to bother him further.” (p. 103)

In further confirmation that the US knew what lay in store for their continued illegal flights over Cuban territory, Juan Pablo Roque, a Cuban double-agent who returned to Cuban in 1996, “insisted the FBI knew in advance the Cuban government would shoot down the planes. ‘FBI agent Oscar Montoto tells me on February 21st, ‘Don’t go on that mission because they are going to knock you out of the sky.’ Agent Montoto told me not to go,’ he repeated.” (p. 110)

Despite US foreknowledge that Cuba planned to physically stop future overflights if the US government did not stop them, it planned to charge Cuban leaders with murdering the four in the shootdown. The US Attorney’s office told the Miami Herald that the ‘best hope” for charging Raul Castro was to get Geraldo Hernandez, the leader of the Cuban 4, to agree to testify against him. “Hernandez himself scoffed at what he called ‘their ‘wild dream,’ the true reason behind their psychological torture [of me].’ In a 2010 letter to me, he wrote ‘it explains why they haven’t let me see my wife for 12 years like every other prisoner, why they haven’t let me write an email to her like every other prisoner, etc.,etc.” (p. 242)

Not mentioned in Kimbers’s book, a US court later declared Cuba owed the families of the four killed in the shootdown $188 million to be collected from Cuban assets. Similar bogus suits have won hundreds of millions of dollars from US courts in “compensation” from Cuba. One reason why Venezuela’s President Maduro canceled his attendance at the United Nations in September 2013 was the threat that the Cubana airliner he was flying in would be confiscated by US authorities for this purpose. http://www.businessweek.com/news/2013-09-27/venezuela-s-maduro-said-to-cancel-u-dot-s-dot-trip-over-cuban-plane

Violent terrorist groups, such as Miami Cuban ones, exist in the US with only token restraint by government agencies, to be used not just against Cubans, but against all of us in the movement for progressive change. It would be short-sighted to regard this as a Miami-Cuba problem. These Miami gangsters play the same social role as the Klu Klux Klan: extra-legal terrorist groups available to the US rulers as forces to intimidate and repress movements for social justice. We now know, for instance, that the FBI not only had advance knowledge of the 1963 church bombing in Mississippi by the KKK that killed four girls, but also helped conceal the criminals’ identity.

Stephen Kimber’s book on the real story of the Cuban 5 could not find a US publisher. Not because he did not give an excellent, readable presentation of their story, but because he did. As Ricardo Alarcon, ex-president of the Cuban National Assembly said of the book, “It is the work of a master journalist, a great writer, and, above all, an honest intellectual, committed only to what he could verify independently.” http://www.granma.cu/ingles/cuba-i/15agosto-33alarcon.html

A discussion of the article “Lies concerning the history of the Soviet Union” posted on this website
| November 8, 2013 | 8:23 am | Action | 1 Comment

A letter to the editor was received from a North Carolina academic, John Harrington, criticizing the posting of the article “Lies concerning the history of the Soviet Union.” A discussion between him and the editor followed:

John Harrington – “I think your publication of the defense of Stalin was an error. One doesn’t have to call oneself a Trotskyist–I don’t–to see that Stalin’s regime is indefensible.

Have you ever read the transcripts of the purge trials, which that regime proudly published? I don’t see how you could read them and find the charges credible.”

Editor’s response – “We are constantly experimenting with the website. One aim we have is to encourage discussion and free speech among the working class. We also like to provide a voice to the voiceless (plagiarized from Democracy Now). Certainly anyone who has anything positive to say about Stalin in this country is suppressed and dismissed as a lunatic, zealot or worse.

Certainly Stalin is one of the most hated figures in history in this country. The bourgeois media has done a very successful propaganda campaign against him since the end of WWII. No doubt many people died unnecessarily and that is unforgiveable. However, I must point out that the same people that attack Stalin don’t denounce Truman for incinerating two cities (Hiroshima and Nagasaki) and they don’t denounce Roosevelt for his participation in the incineration of Dresden. There are numerous other examples of US leaders who committed mass murder both in wartime and in peacetime.

My usual response to people about Stalin is “Don’t throw the baby out with the bathwater.” We must not forget that he led the Soviet Union during the early years when the country was going through an incredible economic expansion in spite of multiple invasions by Western countries, and withstood propaganda attacks by many US and world leaders while building the first experiment in socialism. He also led the Red Army to the defeat of the German Nazis with little help from the US. He did this in spite of a number of early tactical errors militarily that he made when the Nazis invaded. If it were not for Stalin, we might be working in a Nazi slave labor camp today. If he had been alive during Gorbachev’s reign, Stalin might have led opposition to the Soviet government’s craven capitulation to capitalism.

Nevertheless, we don’t think Stalin was a saint. On the other hand, we don’t think he was a devil either.

Perhaps posting the article was an error. We make many errors every day.

Nevertheless, we think people in the US need to learn to think outside the box and not accept bourgeois propaganda as the absolute truth. Accepting the received view has not served working people very well.”

John Harrington’s response – “Just as Hitler is popular among white supremacists who are antisocial, so is Stalin among socialists whose real motives are pathological.

Here’s the point that I think you are missing. The bourgeoisie and its intellectuals have slandered Stalin, but that doesn’t make the opposite of the bourgeois line tolerable. Pol Pot was not a hero because Nixon opposed him, to use a more modern example.

We have to base our opinions of him on what our people, the original Bolsheviks, said of him. They didn’t get to say much because by 1941 Stalin had executed all of the members of the old Politburo who were still alive 20 years after the Revolution.

His record is so horrifying that I think defending him as the author of the article did is the same category as Holocaust denial. It requires something like cultism to sustain.

While you are right that Stalin did preside over industrializing the USSR, that doesn’t mean that development didn’t happen despite him. He set quotas for ‘enemies of the state’ in every industry. To fill those quotas, presumably innocent men were executed or sent to Siberia. For more than six months trains didn’t run on time because a shortage of personnel was created by the purge.

The same goes for military affairs. He purged the army of seasoned officers right before the Nazis invaded and made military decisions that even the surviving generals opposed.

I do not think all of this happened because he was paranoid. I think it grew out of the conditions that the Bolsheviks faced during the czarist period, and out of the role that Stalin played as, in effect, the chief of dirty tricks–bank robbery, piracy, kidnapping, murder–for the party. Stalin did not distinguish between tactics appropriate for use on our enemies and those appropriate for dealing with comrades, and indeed, during the czarist period the party didn’t have the luxury of making that distinction.

I also do not think that we have to save Stalin’s reputation in order to save the socialist cause. Oliver Cromwell founded democracy in England, then became a terrible tyrant. The French Revolution had its terror, followed by Napoleon. The wake of social revolutions is often ugly when social revolutionaries bite off more than they can chew.

You should also consider Stalin from the point of view of the Houston club, yours. During the Leninist phase, the Bolshevik party tolerated open factions and open internal disagreements. People weren’t expelled for disagreeing with the party line, so long as they observed it in action–and even then violations were often overlooked. (Look at the lives of Lunacharsky, Zinoviev or Kamenev for examples of that.) The standards under which your followers were expelled are Stalinist. Had your tendency existed in the USSR in 1937, you would be dead.”

Editor’s response – “Some people have commented that although the CPUSA is virulently anti-Stalin, their tactics in dealing with anyone within the party that disagrees with top leadership is ‘Stalinist’ as conceived by Hoover, McCarthy and other anti-communists. Indeed, some say that top CPUSA leadership criticizes Stalin while putting what they criticize about Stalin into action in dealing with their own internal problems.

The Houston Communist Party is neither a pro- nor anti-Stalin organization. We are pro-working class both in this country and around the world. We oppose purges, and expulsions and other Draconian tactics in dealing with membership. We are in favor of free speech and open discussion and try to promote that through our website. We want to build a mass party of workers which eventually will be powerful enough to win elections and make real changes in our electoral system and process. That does not mean tailing the Democratic, Republican or any other bourgeois party. It does mean organizing working people into their own political party to fight and win power and progress for workers and their families. It also means that we may need to work with bourgeois parties, until we have our own party, to win progressive reforms. However, it doesn’t mean that we have to salute anti-worker policies and actions and support imperialism because Democratic and Republican Party candidates do these things.

We encourage other working people to join the discussion. You can either post a comment to this or any article or send submissions to PHill1917@comcast.net .”

Voter fraud against progressive “third-party” candidates
| November 7, 2013 | 7:57 pm | Action | Comments closed

On Tuesday I worked as a poll worker at my local voting site, 3150 Broadway at Grant Houses, 67 ED 70 AD in Manhattan. During a break, I cast my vote for a third-party candidate, Tony Gronowicz, candidate for Mayor of the Green Party. At the end of the night, when the two scanners put out the tape with the voting results and were taped up on the wall, I looked at the results. Both scanners had “Tony Gronowicz 0.” Therefore my vote (and anyone else’s at that site who voted for Tony Gronowicz) was not counted.

Many people have speculated that the scanners are very easy to program to alter the results, without the voters knowing it. My experience seems to confirm this. Have the scanners been programmed to undercount votes of progressive third party candidates? I plan to report this to the Board of Elections as well as to make this public as widely as possible.

George Gruenthal
Poll worker #279642

georgeg0626@hotmail.com

Maximus Coffee Group workers on strike
| November 5, 2013 | 10:33 pm | Action | Comments closed

You can view videos of the Maximus Coffee Group workers on strike in front of the plant on the following links:

http://youtu.be/sc6sx3Ljn0I

http://youtu.be/N16Q-E3712M

http://youtu.be/2OSfCCupBmM

http://youtu.be/2mPQL3YyuYA

You can support the striking workers by signing the petition at http://petitions.moveon.org/sign/boycott-maximus-coffee-1?source=c.url&r_by=8638452 DSC01633

Thanks for your support!