Category: Party Voices
Portugal should consider leaving Eurozone – Communist Party
| October 2, 2015 | 8:37 pm | Party Voices, political struggle | No comments
A young couple enjoys the view from the top of Lisbon's 1902 Santa Justa lift Friday.

Portugal Should Consider Leaving Eurozone – Communist Party

© AP Photo/ Armando Franca

Portugal should consider the exit from the eurozone as a useful measure to bring the country out of a deep economic crisis, a member of the Political Committee of the Portuguese Communist Party told Sputnik.

MOSCOW (Sputnik), Yulia Shamporova — Portugal should consider the exit from the eurozone as a useful measure to bring the country out of a deep economic crisis, a member of the Political Committee of the Portuguese Communist Party told Sputnik.Portugal, currently experiencing four years of profound economic crisis, is bound by financial obligations to international creditors.

“Among the most important measures which can solve the problems of deep economic and social measures in Portugal…is the contemplation of the possibility for withdrawal of Portugal from the eurozone and preparation for the implementation of this step,” Angelo Alves said.

The politician added that the process of eurozone withdrawal would not be implemented quickly.

“The main goal for Portugal in getting out of eurozone is to contribute to the restoration of economic, monetary and budget sovereignty, making Portugal free from the unacceptable and intolerable frameworks and conditions that contradict the interests of the people and the state,” Alves said.

Moreover, Portuguese authorities neglect the right of young people to live and work, forcing them to leave the country, Angelo Alves said.

According to official data, some 485,000 Portuguese young people emigrated from 2011-2014 amid an economic and social crisis in the country. Youth unemployment now stands at above 30 percent.

“Young people in Portugal were forced to leave their country, otherwise it would not be possible for them to survive or have the possibility to build their future,” Alves said.

The Portuguese government has been implementing austerity measures under a Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) between the troika and governing Portuguese parties, including the Socialist Party (PS), the Social Democratic Party (PSD) and the Democratic and Social Center – People’s Party (CDS-PP).

“Portuguese government denies the fundamental right of half of a million of Portuguese young people, many of them are educated and talented, — the right to live, work and build their future in the country where they were born. But Portuguese government has gone even further: by pushing the Portuguese youth to leave the country it has mortgaged the future of Portugal,” Alves said.

In December 2011, current Portugal Prime Minister Pedro Passos Coelho suggested that the best way for Portuguese youth to find a job was to emigrate to Portuguese-speaking countries like Brazil or Angola.

Portugal will see parliamentary elections on Sunday, October 4. The Portuguese parliament, Assembly of the Republic, has 230 seats, and members are elected for a 4 year term. The Socialist Party (PS) aims to unseat the ruling center-right Portugal Alliance (PaF) led by Prime Minister Pedro Passos Coelho.

Read more:

June Central Committee Report (CP Canada)


election graphic3c copy

Main Political Report
to the Central Committee, CPC
June 13, 2015
Download the full CC report as PDF 

The following was presented by cde Miguel Figueroa on behalf of the Central Executive. The Central Committee adopted the Report unanimously, and directed the CEC to finalize the Report in line with the discussion.

There are a great number of matters before us this weekend, given the long interval since our last full plenum in September. We did convene a special CC teleconference meeting back in February to deal with federal election preparations in the event of an early writ.

This report will focus on two main questions: first, the socio-economic and political situation in Canada, the fightback against austerity and reaction, and the immediate priority of working to help defeat the Harper Conservatives in the coming election; and (2) the ideological, political and organizational work of our own Party, especially with respect to party building and extending our reach and influence in the broader labour and democratic movements.

This report aims to assess the most important developments in our country, and in our party itself, to deepen our ideological and political analysis in leading the work of our party. These valuable discussions should continue and deepen when we gather again in August for the Central School of the CC, and following the Federal election, when we discuss and adopt the draft documents for the 38th Central Convention.

Before proceeding to the heart of our deliberations however, we must first situate Canadian political reality in the broader global context.

On International Developments

Internationally, the main feature today is the dramatic escalation in militarism and the drive to war by U.S. imperialism and its allies (either directly or via local proxies), by growing interference in the domestic affairs of other countries, and by the outright intervention to overturn states and governments perceived to be hostile to its regional or global interests. This escalation in the drive to militarism and war is directly connected to the deepening cyclical and structural crisis afflicting the capitalist system as a whole, and the desperate attempts of the main imperialist centres to protect and extend their respective positions at the expense of their imperialist rivals, at the expense of the vast majority of the peoples and nations in the rest of the world, and at the expense of the global environment.

Within the imperialist countries (including Canada), this increasing aggressiveness manifests itself in an all-sided offensive to roll back the social and economic gains of the working class and working people generally, and sharpened attacks on labour, democratic and civil rights. Labour and the democratic resistance is also growing within the imperialist countries and around the world, but resistance, united around a comprehensive democratic and anti-imperialist alternative, needs to be strengthened in order to turn back this offensive, and move onto the counter-offensive, for socialism.

Internationally, the U.S. and EU imperialist blocs are the primary forces driving this heightened aggression, most often under the ‘flag’ of NATO. For its part, the Harper government is actively promoting the rising tide of aggression, particularly through its military involvement in Iraq and now also Syria, its strident support for the pro-fascist regime in Ukraine, its unqualified backing of Israeli expansionism, and its belligerent attitude to the Bolivarian government in Venezuela.

Whipping up tensions in turn serves to justify increased defence spending. As the World Peace Council recently noted, despite the economic crisis, overall military expenditures last year reached almost $1.5 trillion dollars, some 2.4% of global GDP, 37 % of which was spent by the USA alone. The web of U.S. military bases and installations around the world continues to spread, now estimated at roughly 1,000.

A massive chunk of these wasteful military expenditures is going into the expansion of the NATO military alliance, in order to secure absolute military superiority for the U.S. and its European allies, and to expand its ‘sphere of operations’ not only up to Russia’s eastern and southern flanks, but also from the Middle East and North Africa up to the Arctic.

The escalation of imperialist militarism and aggression is not only reflected in military inter-ventions in local wars and the fomenting of ‘regime change’ in individual countries. It is also pushing the world dangerously closer to world war. The bellicose campaign whipped by the US & NATO bloc against the Russian Federation over the issue of Ukraine, together with the ‘eastern push’ of NATO to tighten its encirclement of Russia (including the redeployment of NATO forces on its borders), raise the very real danger of possible thermonuclear war. PM Harper has been particularly vociferous in revving up this ‘new cold war’ against Russia. At the G7 meeting in Germany last week, he said “Mr. Putin runs an entirely different system… It is not at all like our economy, it doesn’t share our interests, it doesn’t share our values”, and once again claimed that Russia was “expansionist” and constituted a “long-term menace”.

Recent developments in Ukraine figure prominently into US/NATO’s expansionist plans. Following the U.S.-orchestrated fascist coup d’état in February 2014, the illegitimately installed regime of Petro Poroshenko moved quickly to apply for NATO membership, and to call for NATO arms to beef up its brutal onslaught in the Donbass, against cities and enclaves of the Russian-speaking minority who are fighting for regional autonomy to protect their linguistic and other national rights under threat from the Ukrainian nationalist regime in Kiev. Thousands of innocent civilians have perished in this fratricidal conflict. In violation of the truce agreement signed in Minsk earlier this year, the Ukrainian army and its National Guard (made up mostly of fascist and neo-Nazi thugs and criminals) are continuing their assault in an attempt to crush the embattled opposition forces in the East. These gross violations are taking place with the approval, and with the strategic military assistance, of the main imperialist powers including Canada. In light of the genocidal offensive of the Kiev regime, the announcement this April of the Harper government’s decision to dispatch 200 CAF personnel to help train the Ukrainian
Army is deplorable, and our Party demands that this decision be rescinded immediately.

Our Party also condemns the growing wave of anti-democratic and anti-communist repression currently underway in Ukraine. The Kiev regime has launched some 20 criminal cases against leading members of the Communist Party (CPU) including its General Secretary, and the government is fighting a battle in court to ban the party altogether. Furthermore, several weeks ago the bogus ‘parliament’ in Kiev passed a series of bills to “de-communize” Ukraine, banning communist symbols and tearing down monuments to the Soviet heroes of the Great Patriotic War. At the same time, the rump parliament approved legislation to officially restore the ‘good name’ of Stepan Bandera, the leader of the Organization of Ukrainian Nationalists (OUN) and infamous war criminal who colluded with the Nazis during Germany’s bloody occupation of Ukraine in WW2. The legislation would also impose stiff sentences on anyone who exposes this grotesque rewriting of Ukrainian history. While Communists are the main target of this assault, other democratic opponents of the regime are also coming under attack. On June 8, a tent camp set up on the ‘Maidan’ in Kiev by demonstrators protesting against Poroshenko was attacked and torn down by fascist thugs allegedly hired by the authorities. In the face of this fascist repression, our Party expresses its unwavering solidarity with the CPU and all democratic dissent, condemns the ugly wave of anti-communist frenzy, and calls on the Canadian government to publicly and unequivocally disassociate itself from the repressive actions.

* * * * * *

U.S. imperialism has also embarked on a dangerous expansion of its war machine in the Pacific. The U.S. “Pivot to Asia” plan to ‘contain’ the People’s Republic of China calls for the deployment of 60% of its naval fleet in the area, with grave consequences to the peace and stability of the region. Continuing military provocations aimed at the DPRK (North Korea), the 2014 ‘re-interpretation’ of Article 9 of the Japanese constitution by the Abe government to allow for accelerated re-armament of Japan’s Self-Defence Forces, U.S. meddling in the dispute over the Spratly Islands in the South China Sea, and the expanding U.S. military presence in Australia are all parts of this worrisome development. Canada is also moving to install a foreign military base in Singapore which will contribute to this ‘pivot’.

The U.S.-led imperialist drive to encircle both the Russian Federation (through NATO’s ‘eastern push’) and China (via the “Pivot to Asia”) also has a South Asian component. Since its election, the BJP government under PM Narendra Modi has shifted India’s domestic and foreign/military policy sharply to the right, contrary to the desire of the vast majority of the people. It has announced its intentions to privatize certain state utilities, mines and farms, has cut state food subsidies for 20 million of India’s poor, and is actively promoting extreme Hindu nationalism (the so-called Hindutva doctrine, literally “Hindu-ness”), and encouraging Hindu extremist attacks against Muslim and other non-Hindus at the local and state level in parts of the country. Modi and the BJP have a long record in this regard. In 2002, when he was Chief Minister of the Gujarat state, Modi was directly implicated in fomenting communal riots that left up to 2,000 Muslims dead. With respect to India’s foreign policy, Modi is tilting ever more toward the U.S. axis. In January, his government renewed the 10-year Defense Framework Agreement with the U.S. that will now include joint weapons production projects. The two countries also announced a “breakthrough” on the stalled Indo-US nuclear cooperation agreement. In return for his willingness to make India serve as a strategic asset if not an outright ally of the U.S. in its crusade to counter “rising China,” the Washington has declared that Modi would receive immunity from US lawsuits, even if they allege human rights violations he committed.

* * * * * *

Meanwhile, the U.S. & NATO imperialist powers are conducting another set of wars in the Middle East, under the cover of the ‘war on terror’. In reality, this is part of the U.S. strategy of imposing a ‘New Middle East’, composed of a patchwork of weak, fractured Arab states divided among sectarian lines, in order to undermine pan-Arab unity, facilitate Israeli expansionism and extend imperialist domination over the region and its resources.

When the U.S., Canada and other NATO powers first launched airstrikes against the Islamic State (ISIS), our Party warned that this was likely a pretext for imposing regime change in Syria. Four long years of a foreign-sponsored war, financed by the reactionary Arab states and coordinated from Washington, has left Syria a shattered country, with an estimated death toll of more than 215,000 including 20,000 children, and millions more internally displaced or driven into exile. The elected Al-Assad government in Damascus is now caught in a vice, between ISIS attacks in the western part of the country and a new ‘coalition’ of other extremists and mercenaries backed by Saudi Arabia, Qatar and Turkey (the al-Qaida-led “Army of Conquest”) seizing territory from the Syrian army on its eastern flank. In these dire circumstances, our Party must step up its solidarity with the besieged Syrian people, with the Syrian Communists, and with all the progressive, secular and democratic forces of the country striving to defeat this reactionary onslaught and to preserve the sovereignty and independence of their country.

Our Party has condemned the Harper government’s one-year extension of Canada’s participation in the latest imperialist war in Iraq, and its expanded military mission into neighbouring Syria without the agreement of the elected government of that sovereign country. As the CEC statement noted:

“Clearly, this extension shows that Canada is on the way to another disastrous Afghanistan-style war of occupation, ultimately costing billions of dollars and thousands of Iraqi and Syrian lives. Predictably, the Tories call this a ‘humanitarian’ war to ‘protect the women and children’. There is overwhelming evidence that the ‘Responsibility to Protect’ doctrine has… inflicted enormous damage upon civilian populations.”

The wars in Syria and Iraq, the chaos in Libya, the Saudi-led military intervention in Yemen, and domestic turmoil in Egypt – all these are playing into the hands of the Zionist state of Israel to maintain and deepen its illegal occupation of the West Bank, Golan Heights and other Arab lands, and to negate the Palestinian people’s struggle for national self-determination. The March 15 declaration by Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu that if re-elected, his party/government would ensure that Palestine never receives independent statehood confirms that expansionist Israel has been lying to the world for decades, and that it has no intention of ending its occupation and of negotiating a just peace with the Palestinian people based on a two-state solution. Rather, the rapid expansion of illegal settlements on the West Bank, the construction of the ‘wall of shame’, the periodic bombardment and slow economic strangulation of Gaza, and its continued refusal to resume negotiations with the Palestinian Authority – all these actions unmistakably point to the real intentions of the Zionist state: namely, to make life under occupation unbearable for the Palestinians, to force them into permanent exile, and to complete the annexation of remaining Palestinian lands. This is a genocidal policy of ‘ethnic cleansing’, by any other name. As such, it is a crime against humanity.

It is absolutely appalling therefore that the Harper Conservative government should give unbridled political, diplomatic and economic support to the racist, expansionist state of Israel. Turning reality completely on its head, the Tories have threatened to prosecute Canadians who criticize Israel’s actions, and who support boycotts, sanctions and disinvestment (BDS) against Israel, on the basis that such advocacy constitutes a ‘hate crime’. In January, then-foreign minister John Baird signed a “Memorandum of Understanding” with Israel pledging to fight the BDS campaign, which he called “the new face of anti-Semitism” in Canada. Shortly afterward, Public Safety Minister Steven Blaney, in an address at the United Nations, characterized boycotts of Israel as anti-Semitic hate speech and violence. Blaney said Canada would take a policy of “zero tolerance” toward the BDS movement. Our Party categorically denounces these anti-democratic threats intended to muzzle all criticism of, and active opposition to Israeli policy, and calls on our entire party to step up its solidarity with the Palestinian people’s struggle, and in favour of the BDS campaign against Israel.

One encouraging development in the region has been the interim nuclear deal (the Joint Plan of Action) struck between Iran and the P5+1 countries (US, Britain, France, Russia, China and Germany), which our Party cautiously welcomed in a recent CEC statement. Our Party is sharply critical of the autocratic, undemocratic regime in Teheran; however, we also condemn the use of the so-called “Iranian nuclear threat” as a pretext to impose sanctions on the Iranian people, and to foment imperialist aggression against Iran. Our Party therefore considers this ‘framework’ agreement is a small step in a positive direction on the issue of peace in the Middle East. However, we also warned that the deal avoids many of the underlying issues that have contributed to insecurity, conflict and war in the region, not least of which is the fact that there is no consideration or inclusion of the role of Israel – a nuclear weapons state which has not signed the Non-Proliferation Treaty – in the agreement, nor any mention of the military buildup in the region by the US and its allies. Our Party demands that the Canadian government immediately normalize relations with Iran and end all sanctions, reject its current foreign policy of provocation, interference, aggression and war, and adopt an independent foreign policy based on peace and disarmament, including withdrawal from NATO.

* * * * * *

Imperialist intervention is also growing on the African continent. The first major operation after the formation of the U.S. Africa Command (AFRICOM) in 2008 was the US/NATO operation (under a UN Security Council cover) to smash the Gaddafi-led government in Libya in 2011. But the U.S. has also been quietly constructing bases with drone capacity and “forward operating sites” (for special operations) in a number of African countries: Djibouti, Kenya, Ethiopia, Seychelles, Burkina Faso, South Sudan, Central Africa Republic, the Congo and elsewhere. One recent study found US military involvement in no fewer than 49 African nations.

France has also become conspicuously active in Africa, sending some 4,000 soldiers, including special forces, into Mali and another 1,000 troops to the Central African Republic (with German and British logistical support) to “suppress violence” following a coup there. According to the Associa-ted Press, plans for a further French military buildup would include basing 3,000 permanent French soldiers in the Sahel, and placing Mirage fighters at an air base in Chad.

This growing imperialist military presence – including that of former colonial powers – on African soil is raising concern across the continent. US and EU officials claim that this is benign in character, intended to help local governments “restore order”, and to monitor and combat terrorist groups like Boko Haram, al-Shabaab and the Lord’s Resistance Army. The real intention how-ever is far more sinister – to extend imperialism’s global network of bases and military infrastructure across Africa.

The Western military expansion in Africa is directly related to imperialism’s economic interests and intentions – to “re-colonize” this strategic continent rich in agricultural land, oil, precious metals and other resources, and to counter the growing economic presence of the People’s Republic of China and the political influence of South Africa on the affairs of the continent. This is particularly evident in the surge in land purchase by foreign companies and governments to grow food and other crops for export. Such foreign land acquisitions have the potential to hurt domestic efforts to raise food production and could limit broad-based economic growth. Many deals have little oversight, transparency or regulation, have no environmental safeguards and fail to protect smallholder farmers from losing their customary rights to use land.

* * * * * *

The one continent where imperialist interests continue to suffer setbacks is South America. At the 7th Summit of the Americas in April, President Obama and his administration took a pounding, as delegation after delegation rose to condemn U.S. economic and political interference in their affairs, and to demand that Washington rescind its executive decree calling Venezuela a ‘national security threat’. It was also a significant moment for socialist Cuba, with the island being invited to participate for the first time, represented by its president, Raúl Castro.

This breakthrough was made possible by the growing pressure from the vast majority of its member-states to end Washington’s isolation of Cuba, and preceded by the historic December 17, 2014 announcement of steps – although still preliminary and partial – to achieve a political and diplomatic rapprochement between the U.S. government and Cuba, and announcing the release of the three remaining imprisoned members of the Cuban Five. The December 17th speech of President Obama was an historic moment, an admission by U.S. imperialism that its 55 years of economic blockade, subversion, and attempts to isolate Cuba had ended in dismal failure. The subsequent decision to remove Cuba from the U.S. Administration’s list of states sponsoring terrorism was also quite significant. Of course, the legislative measures imposing the economic blockade still remain in place, and other important issues such as the repatriation of Guantanamo Bay to Cuba are still unresolved. In such circumstances, it is vital that our Party continue to give its wholehearted support to the friendship and solidarity movement with Cuba. The recent convention of the Canadian Network on Cuba (CNC) has elaborated new priorities for this important work, and we must do everything possible to help realize these objectives.

At the same time, we should take serious note of imperialism’s continuing and unrelenting efforts to overturn progressive and anti-imperialist gains in Latin America. This past February, yet another coup attempt against the Bolivarian Revolution in Venezuela planned to bomb the Presidential Palace, the National Assembly, Telesur TV network, and the Defence Ministry on February 12, the one-year anniversary of violent anti-government attacks which caused 43 deaths. Canadian complicity in this coup plot, in which an RCMP member was involved seeking information on airport capacity in case of emergencies, has never been explained or renounced by Ottawa. Fortunately, however, the planned coup was foiled in time by the Venezuelan government and people.

Perhaps even more serious is the protracted ‘economic war’ being waged on its national economy by the local capitalist class, with guidance and support from U.S. imperialism. By artificially creating shortages and price hikes, it aims to erode popular support among the people for the Maduro government and its ambitious program for economic and social reform. Taking a leaf from the sabotage handbook used to destabilize Allende’s Chile before the Pinochet fascist coup in 1973, the forces hostile to the Bolivarian process – both domestic and foreign – are trying to create similar conditions as a precursor to another coup d’état. The message from Washington to the people of Venezuela is brutal and clear: surrender to a neoliberal dictatorship, or face slow death from starvation and bullets. Confronted with this vicious imperialist campaign, our Venezuelan comrades have asked us to strengthen our solidarity with their revolutionary process. We should agree here to act accordingly, by condemning every manifestation of Canadian complicity in this counter-revolutionary campaign, by demanding a wholesale change in Canada’s relations with Venezuela to one based on friendship and respect for national sovereignty, and by assigning more comrades to this field of work to help strengthen the solidarity movement across the country.

A similar destabilization campaign, led by domestic capitalists with support from imperialist quarters, is being waged against the Correa government in Ecuador. Prompted by the passage of the Wealth Redistribution Law which restricts the inheritances of the super-wealthy, reactionary forces have organized a series of violent demonstrations in an effort to destabilize and oust the democratically-elected government. However, popular support remains strong for President Rafael Correa, who won the 2013 election with an overwhelming 57% support.

In Colombia, the peace negotiations between the government and the FARC-EP insurgency continue to drag on. Although some progress has been achieved, it is becoming increasingly clear that the Santos government is purposely delaying the process in order to weaken the FARC forces on the ground. It has launched numerous bombing raids and ground assaults in recent weeks. In such circumstances, our Party expresses its continued solidarity with the FARC-EP, and demands the Colombian government negotiate an end to the 51 year-long civil war, release all political prisoners, and agree to genuine land reform and other democratic demands of the Colombian people.

Overall, the political and socio-economic advances which have been scored in Latin America in recent years are quite significant. We should note here that our sister Communist parties in Venezuela, Brazil, Ecuador, Bolivia and elsewhere across Latin America have been very active in helping to build and deepen this process. While these partial advances are still developing, and in no instance constitute a ‘revolutionary leap’ in terms of the transfer of state power to the working class and its allies, they nevertheless mark real movement along the road to fundamental transformation. As Albano Nunes, a leading member of the Portuguese Communist Party succinctly placed it,

“…the challenges, doubts, and uncertainties [in the process in Latin America] should not lead us to underestimate the importance of what was achieved so far for the masses who were historically exploited and oppressed … Nor should they make us forget that the ways of social progress, while obeying laws that have universal validity, are increasingly more diverse and influenced by the history and national specificities of individual countries. Indeed, they do not follow pre-defined ‘models’ but are rather the creative work of the masses with their revolutionary vanguard. …We are living in the era, inaugurated by the October Revolution, when capitalism will be replaced by socialism, but the stages, forms and pace at which different countries move towards socialism will depend on the specific circumstances of individual countries and the relations and relative strength of its various classes, and will therefore be very diverse.”

* * * * * *

The escalation in imperialist aggression, the main aim of which is to secure resources and markets for plunder, is directly related to the deepening systemic crisis of capitalism itself, and to the desperate attempts of the dominant imperialist centres to resolve this crisis on terms which pre-serve and advance their respective interests and forestall the advance of the BRICS countries. The impact of the worldwide economic meltdown of 2007/08 – by far the most intense and protracted cyclical crisis since the Great Depression – continues to resonate. Economic growth rates in the main imperialist centres – U.S., Japan and EU – remain sluggish. In Europe, GDP growth is virtually zero and many of the EU member-states (Greece, Spain, Portugal, and Italy) are perilously close to defaulting on their massive accumulated debt. The austerity measures imposed on these countries by the EU and the bankers to ensure repayment have led to a massive surge in unemployment and poverty among the masses of the people.

One of the sure signs that the capitalist crisis if far from over is reflected in the fact that the ‘debt bubble’ has continued to grow at a staggering and unsustainable rate. The McKinsey Global Institute, a bourgeois think-tank, noted recently that instead of indebtedness receding in the period following the onset of the crisis, “all major economies today have higher levels of borrowing relative to GDP than they did in 2007. Global debt in these years has grown by $57 trillion, raising the ratio of debt to GDP by 17 percentage points. That poses new risks to financial stability and may undermine global economic growth.” Meanwhile, corporate and bank profits have rebounded handsomely, but both private (corporate) and state reinvestment levels in new goods and services production and infra-structure remain at very low levels in most leading capitalist countries, including Canada. This glut of so-called ‘dead money’ (assets not funnelled back into the cycle of extended reproduction), is instead being used to consolidate and centralize capital in the hands of a dwindling core of ‘super-monopolies’, and the largest global banking institutions.

This in turn is driving up structural unemployment rates in real terms, as full-time, well paying jobs are increasingly replaced by part-time, temporary and other precarious forms of employment, and forcing real wages to plummet. In the U.S., for instance,

“…median inflation-adjusted income last year was $2,100 lower than in 2009 and $3,600 lower than in 2001. 50% of all American workers made less than $28,031 a year, while a whopping 39% brought home less than $20,000. Furthermore, the gap between high- and low-income groups is the widest it has been in 100 years and the share of U.S. consumers who call themselves middle class has never been lower.” [Money Morning Staff Reports, February 2015]

Even more serious than the current cyclical malaise is the longer term economic and political outlook for the U.S. and EU powers, as their hegemonic positions come under increasing challenge from the so-called BRICS countries. Currently, the combined economies of the BRICS – Brazil, Russia, India, China and South Africa – amount to 18% of global GDP but their share, led primarily by China’s economic growth, is expected to rise to fully 1/3 of worldwide GDP by 2030. Using a different econometric measure, the “Purchasing Power Parity” index (which adjusts for the real value of respective currencies), the BRICS’ share would increase to over 45% of global economic activity by 2030. The recent talks between Brazil and the Russian Federation about plans to create a BRICS development bank and other moves to weaken the monopoly of the US dollar as the international reserve currency are sure signs of this changing balance of forces internationally.
This seismic shift in relative economic might has precipitated a number of counter-measures by the U.S. and EU to shore up their flagging position through an accelerated push for regional trade and investment pacts (CETA, and US-EU trade agreement, the Trans-Pacific Partnership [TPP], etc.), and through increased militarization aimed at pressuring and “containing” both Russia and the PRC.

Assessing the current role of the BRICS countries, both individually and as a “group”, requires more study and discussion. Clearly, it would be quite wrong to draw facile parallels between the class, internationalist role that the former Soviet Union and the socialist community of states played through much of the past century, and the BRICS states of today. The BRICS cooperate around shared interests, but this group is not a stable, much less a coherent anti-imperialist, alliance. They operate within and largely accom-modate themselves to the dynamics of global capitalism, even if some take positions on certain international issues which overlap with the stance of the peace and anti-imperialist forces around the world. At the same time however, it would be equally wrong to dismiss the BRICS as a just another rival, imperialist formation. BRICS policies and actions that help to inhibit the aggressive agenda of imperialism should be welcomed; BRICS policies and actions which undermine international peace and security and/or run counter to the interests of the working class and oppressed peoples (including the working class and peoples of their own countries) should be criticized and resisted.

* * * * * *

Despite the failure of neoliberal recipes to re-fire growth, ruling capitalist governments have in the main stubbornly struck to pro-austerity, anti-labour measures (even when mixed with fiscal stimulus), the results of which continue to place an overwhelming burden on the backs of the working class and its allies – indigenous peoples, women, seniors and retirees, youth and students – while protecting corporate wealth and even accelerating the concentration and centralization of capital.
Indeed, this concentration of accumulated wealth on a global scale is reaching dizzying heights. As an Oxfam research paper released earlier this year points out, “the richest 1 percent have seen their share of global wealth increase from 44 percent in 2009 to 48 percent in 2014. Members of this global elite had an average wealth of $2.7 million per adult in 2014. Of the remaining 52 percent of global wealth, almost all (46 percent) is owned by the rest of the richest fifth of the world’s population. The other 80 percent share just 5.5 percent…”

In the face of this widening social disparity – caused in the main by corporate-driven wage cuts and other takebacks, pro-austerity cuts to public and social services by capitalist governments, and by regressive tax policies that shift the burden onto working people – labour and popular resistance continues to grow particularly in Europe where the austerity agenda has been most harshly implemented. Strikes and protests have continued in Greece, Spain, Portugal and many other countries, such as Ireland, where this March, up to 40,000 anti-austerity protesters marched through Dublin against additional charges for water. The Communist parties have played an important and in some cases decisive role in building up the mass anti-austerity movements across Europe, especially the KKE (and PAME) in Greece and the Portuguese CP in Portugal.

Broad opposition to the cuts imposed by the Troika (European Commission, IMF and the European Central Bank) have led sections of working people, ruined farmers and small business people, and sections of the intelligentsia and middle strata to embrace newly spawned (or reconfigured) social democratic parties and movements such as Syriza and Podemos which advance radical-sounding promises to ‘stand up’ to the austerity agenda of the Troika. In Greece, the January 25th general election actually resulted in Syriza winning a plurality of seats in the Hellenic parliament, although short of an absolute majority. Podemos is positioned to make similar gains in Spain in the general elections slated for this coming December.

The rise in the political fortunes of Syriza, Podemos and like-oriented ‘new’ parties in other countries, must be understood not only as an angry reaction by the electorate to the Troika and the austerity dictates of finance capital, but also as a mass rejection of the political bankruptcy of the older, established social-democratic parties which dutifully imposed those very same neo-liberal, austerity policies while in office. In Greece for instance, the once-powerful PASOK saw its electoral support plummet to under 5% in the last election.

It is significant that more and more working people are rejecting not only the parties of big business, but also the mainstream social democratic parties, and are searching for alternative paths forward. That many are gravitating to ‘new left’ (but still essentially social democratic) formations is not surprising. But these ‘new, improved’ and ‘radical’ variants of social democracy do not call for a decisive break with the austerity agenda, much less constitute a systemic or revolutionary challenge to the dictates of monopoly capital. While many cling to the hope that this time around, such parties won’t ‘sell out’ or betray their interests as previous reformist, social democratic formations have done, it is far more likely that they will become yet another sad reminder of what Karl Marx warned against: “History repeats itself, first as tragedy, second as farce”.

Many people in Greece and around the world were elated by the news of Syriza’s victory, but that early enthusiasm has quickly dissipated. Immediately following the election, Syriza struck a deal with the Party of Independent Greeks (ANEL), as its junior partner in a ruling coalition. ANEL includes extreme right-wingers, with some members having made explicitly anti-Semitic statements and expressed the wish for immigrants in Greece to “go back to their own countries”. Then the new Syriza government sent its finance minister off to Brussels to renegotiate the terms of Greece’s debt enslavement to the European bankers; then it reneged on its promise to rehire sacked government workers; then it offered NATO a new naval base on its soil; etc. One commentator summed up the conflicted sentiments of many Greeks with this comment: “We’re all hoping for the best but Syriza’s proclaimed goal is not to overthrow the status quo. Instead, it wants to bargain for a kinder, gentler form of impalement.”

The point here is not to slander these ‘new left’ formations, but rather to point out that their structural and programmatic limitations, aimed at seeking accommodation and an ‘historic compromise’ with EU Capital will invariably lead to defeat, absorption and betrayal of their radical-sounding promises. In our view, genuine working class advance must be based on a complete ‘rupture’ with the logic of capitalist state rule, and a determined revolutionary struggle to supplant its power with working class power, with socialism.

* * * * * *

We must also take serious note of the dangerous growth of electoral support for parties of the extreme right in several countries across Europe. Advancing populist, nationalist and anti-EU slogans, trading on people’s fear and insecurity, and blaming the scourge of high unemployment on immigrant communities and trade unions, a number of far right parties have made alarming headway in local, national and EU-wide elections in France, Norway, Switzerland, Austria, Britain, Belgium, Finland, Hungary and elsewhere. They have extended their base well beyond the petit-bourgeoisie to substantial sections of the working class. They have even gained political control of a number of municipal and regional governments. Many of these extremist parties not only put forward anti-immigrant, racist and ultra-nationalist slogans and demands; they also openly advance fascist and neo-Nazi positions. Their increased media presence and sophisticated use of social media is turning public discourse sharply to the right.

As the recently issued “European Anti-fascist Manifesto” warned, the far-right, neo-fascist forces:

“are gaining mass influence in the poorer layers of society turning this influence systematically against traditional and newer scapegoats (immigrants, Muslims, Jews, LGBT, disabled people,…) as well as against left wing organizations and trade unions… the general implementation of sweeping austerity measures is already making the rise of the extreme right an almost general phenomenon… The impetuous rise of the extreme right and the emergence of an ultra-violent mass neo-fascism are no longer an exception to the European rule. In fact, the neo-fascist threat in many European countries is already so direct and immediate it has transformed the antifascist struggle into the first priority, a battle of life and death…”

While ultra-right and neo-fascist groups have much less visible presence or support in Canada at the present time, it would be incorrect to dismiss or underestimate this danger. Indeed, the threat of fascism is growing here as well, and must be combated now and stopped dead in its tracks. This adds heightened importance to the struggle against all manifestations of right-wing populism, anti-immigrant attacks, racism and fascism, and our Party must raise its own activity in this field and encourage the broad trade union movement and democratic forces to be vigilant and united in exposing and countering this threat.

* * * * * *

Meanwhile, the looming environmental calamity of global warming draws ever nearer; indeed, many of its effects are already being felt in terms of changing weather patterns, soil erosion, endangered species, etc. The latest Assessment Report from the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) notes with alarm that earlier forecasts had grossly underestimated the pace of climate change. Based on new data and better assessment techniques, the IPCC now projects that warming is expected to go up between 1.4 and 5.8oC between 1990 and 2100. This is far more than the 1995 projection of a 1 to 3.5 oC temperature rise. Furthermore, warming in the northern regions of North America, and northern and central Asia will be 40% more than the global average. Snow cover has already dropped by about 10% since the 1960s, and there is a widespread retreat of mountain glaciers outside the polar regions. Precipitation in the northern hemisphere is rising by 0.5 to 1% every decade, while in parts of Asia and Africa, the frequency and intensity of droughts have increased in recent years.

Many scientists now predict that the world’s environment has already passed the ‘tipping point’, and that the catastrophic impact of global warming is no longer avoidable, even if new carbon emissions are significantly reduced (beyond those targets set in Kyoto). Indeed, climate change impacts in this hemisphere are already significant and likely to become more intense in the near future, a new report released by the Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean has warned. The organization said that effects are already being seen in agricultural activity, water availability, forests and biodiversity, sea level changes, tourism and people’s health.

And yet the leading imperialist powers continue to doddle while Rome burns, or worse. Some governments – especially the despicable role played by the Harper Conservatives in Ottawa – are actively obstructing any new international agreement requiring mandatory emission reductions in order to protect the profit interests of the large fossil fuel monopolies. This was played out again at the recent G7 meeting, where Canada managed to water down the final communiqué on ‘de-carbonization’, pushing back to target date until the end of the 21st century.

* * * * * *

Finally, our Party notes that this year also marks the 70th anniversary of the murderous U.S. bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, killing or injuring over 225,000 people, mostly civilians. It is also 35 years since the signing of the Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT), in which countries with nuclear arsenals pledged to negotiate general and complete nuclear disarmament. And yet there is still no progress to eliminate the nuclear threat to humanity. Instead, the highly profitable ‘war machine’ marches on and proliferation continues, but under new technological conditions which are giving rise to new generations of ‘conventional’ weapons which blur the lines between conventional arms and weapons of mass destruction (WMDs). Imperialist-driven local and regional wars flare in several parts of the world, and the threat of a generalized, global conflagration draws nearer.

This stark reality brings into sharp focus the need for our Party to do everything to strengthen the broad peace movement across the country, and in particular to continue to sup-port efforts to build and expand the Canadian Peace Congress as its most conscious, anti-imperialist contingent.

On the Domestic Situation, the Fightback, and the Coming Elections

Let’s now turn our attention to the Canadian economy, the struggle against capitalist austerity and reaction, and the significance of the coming federal elections.

First however, let us address the tremendous significance of the Truth and Reconciliation Report issued earlier this week. The Commission’s report condemned Canada’s longstanding Aboriginal policy to eliminate Aboriginal governments, to ignore Aboriginal rights and terminate Treaties, and, through a process of assimilation, to cause Aboriginal peoples to cease to exist as distinct legal, social, cultural, religious, and racial entities in Canada. “The establishment and operation of residential schools were a central element of this policy, which can best be described as ‘cultural genocide’.” Our Party welcomes this historic report, and calls on the Canadian government to implement all of its 94 recommendations as a necessary first step to rectify the historic crimes committed against Canada’s indigenous peoples, and the complete recognition of their national rights.

* * * * * *

As we are well aware, the global economic crisis impacted the Canadian economy to a lesser extent than most other domestic economies in the leading capitalist states, not to mention the lesser developed economies in Africa, Asia, or Latin America. In large measure, this was due to Canada’s bountiful fossil fuels and other natural resources which helped to buffer the decline, and also because Canada’s megabanks were somewhat less exposed to the collapse in value of leveraged (re-packaged) debt. Nevertheless, Canadian finance capital – the largest corporations and banks – have taken full advantage of the crisis to consolidate their holdings, to downsize production (destroying excess capacity), and to raise labour productivity while attacking the wages, benefits and living standards of workers.

Likewise, governments at all three levels have implemented austerity policies, have eroded and/or privatized social services, and have shifted the tax burden more and more onto the backs of working people, primarily by cutting corporate and wealth taxes on the rich.

This capitalist offensive has resulted in ever-widening social disparity between rich and poor. Recent figures from the OECD show that Canada is among the worst of the advanced capitalist countries in terms of the widening income gap between top earners and others in society. The top 1% of Canadian pre-tax income earners now capture 37% of the overall income growth, and swallow up 12.2 per cent of the country’s income pie, ranking Canada only behind the U.S., Great Britain, and Germany in terms of income disparity among the 18 relatively rich countries compared. On the other hand, real incomes for working people have been declining steadily for decades, but particularly since the onset of the current crisis.

While the official unemployment figures remain steady (at 6.8%), these statistics belie the fact that the pattern of job loss/job creation is shifting dramatically. Part-time jobs accounted for 80% of net job creation over the past year and the share of workers in part-time positions now stands at 19.3%. By comparison, in 1976 that figure stood at only 12.5 per cent.

Furthermore, temporary contract positions have increased the most, and now stand at 1.1 million workers, up 83% since 1997. Temp workers tend to have lower pay, fewer benefits and less on-the-job training than permanent, full-time workers.
The other side of the equation is of course the loss of full-time and well-paying jobs. In March 2015 alone, some 28,000 full-time positions disappeared, mostly in manufacturing (e.g., Bombardier, Blackberry, Kelloggs), construction, mining (Iron Ore Co. in Labrador City) and in the tar sands development (owing to the collapse of world oil prices, but also because of growing mobilizations by Aboriginal peoples and environmental activists opposing this expansion). In B.C., some 17,000 full-time jobs were lost this spring. There has also been a raft of layoffs in the service and retail sector. In addition to the 17,500 jobs lost at Target, there have been large layoffs announced at CIBC, Future Shop, Tim Hortons, Black’s Photography, Mexx and Jacob stores, among others. Job losses in these sectors, combined with the lack of job creation (especially for new entrants in the labour market) in the economy in general has driven youth unemployment through the roof, often two to three times higher than the general rate of unemployment.

Wage reductions, and the loss of full-time work, have cut into the incomes and purchasing power of working people across the country. The drop in the Canadian dollar (from near-parity to roughly 80 cents US) has also driven prices for food and other imported goods up dramatically, further reducing purchasing power. Because of the gradual decimation of the secondary manufacturing sector of the Canadian economy over the past two decades or more, there is little countervailing benefit derived from the weaker national currency (compared to the U.S. dollar), except perhaps in the tourism industry. Not surprisingly, millions of working people and those on fixed incomes are finding themselves in an increasingly precarious financial position, often a pay cheque or two away from homelessness. Savings rates are at an historic low, and by the end of the last quarter of 2014, the ratio of household debt to ‘disposable’ income hit an all-time high of 163.3%!

Dwindling real incomes are driving more and more Canadians into poverty. 4.8 million are now below the poverty line (i.e., 1 in every 7 people). More than 200,000 experience homelessness each year, and almost 1 in every 5 households have serious ‘housing affordability issues’ (spending over 50% of their income on rent). The housing crisis in the largest cities is growing ever more acute, especially in Toronto and Vancouver, where rents and housing prices have been artificially inflated by rampant real estate speculation. Housing in Vancouver, for instance, is now rated as the second-most unaffordable in the entire world!

Furthermore, the pay gap between men and women for work of equal value is once again widening, forcing more women into the ranks of the working poor. While the scourge of growing poverty affects every major urban centre (as well as in the countryside) and cuts across every community and demographic group, indigenous peoples, working women, seniors on modest pensions, racialized and immigrant communities, and youth and students are hardest hit. But nowhere is the scourge of poverty more entrenched and institutionalized than among Aboriginal peoples. As the May 2014 report of James Anaya, the UN Rapporteur on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples in Canada, pointed out, the “abysmal” social conditions in First Nations are reflected in the fact that out of the poorest 100 communities in Canada, 96 are indigenous.

Shrinking pay cheques and higher prices on food, housing and other essentials only tell part of the story. Add to this the impact of increased user fees and diminished public services, ravaged by government austerity, dwindling access to Employment Insurance (now denied to more than 60% of the unemployed), and the corporate attack on defined-benefit pension plans, and the socio-economic reality for millions of working people becomes ever more precarious and stark.
This decline in living standards for the vast majority of working people is coupled with a corresponding spike in profits, especially for the banks, oil & resource monopolies, and other large corporations. For instance, Canada’s top three telecommunications giants Rogers Communications, Bell and Telus averaged profit margins of 45.9% in the last fiscal year, well above the international average. In the manufacturing sector, an average of four percent of jobs have disappeared every year since the recession hit, but during that same period, manufacturing profits soared a stunning 24.3%. It should come as no surprise then that despite stagnant re-investment of capital and virtually no overall GDP growth in the domestic economy, stock prices (a measure of current and projected profits) on the TSX are near historic highs.

* * * * * *

The political situation in the country is unfolding in this socio-economic context of ever-widening social disparities. Growing job insecurity, increased household debt levels, deteriorating social services due to government ‘restraint’ measures, and a tightening squeeze on the real incomes and living standards of working people and their families on one hand; and rapidly accumulating wealth in the coffers of the banks, corporations and the super-rich, on the other. This is the net result of the anti-working class offensive of monopoly interests at the workplace, around the bargaining table, and through the austerity policies of governments, especially the Harper Conservatives in Ottawa. Indeed, this is the true face of Harper’s “economic action plan”, to enhance corporate profitability and the concentration of capital through a wholesale transfer of wealth from the working class, small farmers and primary producers, Aboriginal peoples, women, new immigrant communities and migrant workers, youth and the elderly.

Part of this strategy is to transform the functions of the state, downsizing and privatizing its social distributive role. In particular, there is a sharpened attack on the principle of universality in the public healthcare system, on direct forms of income support such as EI and pensions, and on social transfers for education and social welfare. These attacks come together with efforts to further ‘deregulate’ the economy by attacking labour laws, equity programs, and environmental protections to promote corporate interests. Finally, there is a concerted drive to strengthen the repressive apparatus of the state through more militarization and foreign aggression, more covert surveillance of its citizens, longer sentences, and more police and prisons, etc.

Another key aspect of this agenda is to facilitate the corporate re-structuring of the economy itself by sponsoring pro-corporate trade deals like the Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement (CETA) with the EU, and the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) deal. The most immediate battleground is around stopping the CETA pact which, in order to take effect, must be approved by provincial governments, meaning that the struggle to stop this disastrous sell-out agreement has now moved to another stage.

This corporate restructuring also takes the form of permitting massive de-industrialization and capital flight from the country, in changing immigration policy to provide cheap and vulnerable labour through the Temporary Foreign Worker Program and other reactionary changes to immigration law (C-43 followed by C-24), and in accelerating the exploitation and export of Canada’s natural resources regardless of its social and environmental impact.

Permeating virtually every aspect of this strategy is the sharp attack on democratic rights and processes. The rights of labour to organize, to collective bargaining and to strike are being curtailed through restrictive legislation and back-to-work orders. Deportations (including Canadian-born citizens) are being authorized without legal redress. The rights of environmental and other concerned groups to intervene against large and destructive development projects are being attacked. Progressive charities that speak out against government policy are being targeted for forensic audits. The rights of women and other affected workers to challenge employer violations of equity standards are being diminished. Government scientists are being gagged. The electoral system itself has also come under attack through the passage of the misnamed “Fair Elections Act” which actually weakens the ability of Elections Canada to prevent and/or punish electoral fraud (like the “robo-calls” scandal), which disenfranchises hundreds of thousands of voters, especially among national minorities, and which allows the ruling Tories to evade campaign spending restrictions. And the list goes on.

This attack on democratic rights is also reflected in the daily lives of the people, and on the streets of our communities through the increasingly authoritarian and repressive behaviour of the police. The brutal attacks on student protestors in Montreal, the racist use of “carding” (whereby police can demand civilians to present their identification without any reason or justification) in Toronto and other centres across Canada, and the increasing violation of personal privacy by the State and corporations, are being met by growing resistance.

Particularly significant in this regard is the Harper government’s new “anti-terrorism” legislation (Bill C-51), and the diverse and growing opposition which has sprung up against it across the country. The Ontario wing of our Party has summed up the main character of this dangerous legislation in the draft documents for their 28th Convention:

“Bill C-51 has effectively created the conditions for the emergence of a state within a state: a police state… This is the very grave danger our country faces, and is the biggest threat to labour, democratic, and civil rights today. …Bill C-51 is also one of the most important connectors between the war at home and the war abroad, and the corporate agenda which binds them together. In the frantic effort to salvage the economy from a deepening crisis, through the twin policies of austerity and war, capital is demanding unfettered power and mobility.”

That dangerous bill has now been passed in the Commons and Senate, and proclaimed into law, but this should not stop our resistance to this anti-democratic, police-state legislation. Initial steps have been taken to call another anti-C51 day of action in September, and many groups are pressuring the Liberals and NDP for commitments to repeal (not just amend) C-51 if they are elected on October 19th.

The state-led assault on democratic rights is augmented by the spread of racist and fascist ideas by far-right groups in civil society. For example, a new fascist outfit, the New Constitution Party of Canada, has recently been formed. This group claims to be based on “Christian Libertarian values” which plans to “reverse the damage caused by cultural and economic Marxism”. It advances the slogan “Expel the Parasites”, and features a Hitler salute on its party logo. In Quebec, branches of the PEGIDA, a German-based racist, anti-immigrant and Islamophobic group, have surfaced. And supporters of the Greek fascist Golden Dawn have begun distributing leaflets on the streets of Toronto. As noted earlier, this means struggling to combat all manifestations racism and fascism. Our Party must raise its own activity in this field and encourage the broad trade union movement and democratic forces to be vigilant and united in exposing and countering this threat.

* * * * * *

Despite these adverse conditions however, there is a strong and growing mood among workers and the broader democratic movements to resist the combined onslaught of the corporate bosses and their governments. This is reflected not only in the workplaces, around the negotiating table and on picket lines, but also on the streets in the form of mass extra-parliamentary actions – among Aboriginal Peoples carrying forward the spirit of the Idle No More movement to struggle for their just national rights; around critical environmental issues such as opposition to the Keystone, Northern Gateway, Kinder Morgan and Line 9 pipelines, and fracking; among youth and students, especially in Québec, against tuition increases, police violence and austerity; the “Fight for $15” labour/community battle to raise the minimum wage; the struggle against Bill 1 in Nova Scotia; and against reaction and in defense of democratic rights, such as the recent mass mobilizations against the Tories’ C-51 legislation, etc.

There are a number of common features in these diverse struggles and mobilizations: their multi-class character, but primarily composed of working class and working people in general; the increasing involvement of people relatively new to mass action; the increasingly youthful character of participants, not only in student struggles, but also environmental, Aboriginal and pro-democracy mobilizations; and finally, the growing tendency to seek broader allies in these various struggles, and to draw connections between specific issues and the larger fight against austerity policies and reactionary governments and business interests. These are very important and positive features, which contradicts the view of cynics that the will to protest is receding.

At the same time, many of these mobilizations still suffer from a relative lack of coordination, too often tend to be localized and spontaneous in character, and short on a clear program of action and articulated alternatives. The greater involvement of Party activists in these movements, and our efforts to help these movements overcome those deficiencies in particular, is the best way for us to contribute to building the overall fightback.

This mood to struggle can also be seen in a number of militant strikes and labour actions over the recent period – the courageous battle by BC teachers last fall; the labour/community struggle to reverse plans to end home mail delivery by Canada Post, and in solidarity with CUPW (postal workers), one of the most progressive unions in the country; the militant struggle mounted by CUPE locals of TAs and sessional professors at York and the University of Toronto earlier this year; and in the spirited strike actions by secondary teachers at the Durham, Rainbow and Peel District School Boards in Ontario before being legislated back to work by the Wynne Liberals, to highlight just a few. Some other strike actions were also thwarted by government intervention, such as the strike of 3,300 locomotive engineers, conductors and other railway workers at Canadian Pacific back in February which lasted just 24 hours before federal Labour Minister Kellie Leitch threatened them with back-to-work legislation for “undermining” the Canadian economy. It is noteworthy here that according the C-51 – which redefines terrorism as any threat to “the economic or financial stability of Canada” – this and other job actions by Canadian workers could be deemed a form of “terrorism”.

Major labour confrontations are also on the horizon this coming fall, involving provincial public sector workers in both Ontario and Québec. In both cases, the ruling (Liberal) governments claim that the cupboard is bare, and that in the interests of ‘prudent fiscal management’, they must impose wage freezes and wring other concessions such as pensions, seniority rights, workplace safety protections, and other benefits from their collective agreements.

In Québec, the three main labour centrals (FTQ, CSN and CSQ) have come together to form a ‘front commun’ for negotiating collective agreements for 450,000 provincial public sector employees, whose contracts ended this March. They are preparing to strike possibly as early as this fall unless the government removes its concessionary demands. Late last year, a broader coalition of trade unions, feminists, popular and environmental groups and student associations was also formed to fight against the austerity program of the Couillard government. The idea of the necessity of a “political strike” against the austerity program is growing despite resistance from the leaders of the labour centrals. This situation leads more and more activists to criticize the class collaboration practiced by the union leadership for years, and to demand a more combative trade unionism.

The new mood in the labour movement – the mood to resist – was certainly evident at last May’s Canadian Labour Congress (CLC) Convention, where a groundswell among delegates narrowly defeated former president Ken Georgetti in favour of Hassan Yussuff once he publicly endorsed the action program of the “Take Back the CLC” movement calling for labour unity and militant action. In the 13 months since that Convention, we note some positive changes in the CLC’s political approach, although the new leadership has yet to prove itself by breaking the pattern of passivity that informed the entirety of the Georgetti years, by bringing forward a militant program against austerity around which the entire labour movement and its democratic allies can unite and fight. The ‘jury is still out’ on the new leadership, and the deep divide so evident on the convention floor between the class collaborationist, business unionism forces, on one hand, and the more activist, “social unionism” current on the other, still remain.

The clash between these two main currents within the trade union movement is also being played out within the largest provincial federation, the Ontario Federation of Labour (OFL) under President Sid Ryan. The progressive OFL leadership has played an important role in building labour coordination and solidarity around major trade union battles in the province, and in forging the Ontario Common Front with social allies in the communities. At the same time, the OFL Executive has been under constant siege by right-wing, collaborationist union affiliates, which have tried to stymie the extra-parliamentary mobilization of the labour movement. They have launched personal slander campaigns, and gone on a per capita dues strike to weaken and possibly derail to top leadership of the Federation and defeat the trend it represents within the labour movement.

This conflict was also evident at last November’s BC Fed of Labour convention. In describing that convention, the BC Labour Committee noted the “differing approaches to the question of the political role of the BC Fed. Should the main organization of labour activism in the province have an independent political voice for the working class, or simply concern itself with trade union issues and leave political affairs to the New Democratic Party?” [People’s Voice, Feb. 1, 2015]

Independent labour political action vs. ‘contracting out’ to a ‘labour friendly’ NDP. Labour unity and struggle, vs. trying to resurrect the ‘social contract’ between labour, business and government. In essence, these fundamental strategic choices constitute fault lines lying beneath the surface of the most urgent and important debates in the trade union movement today. But there is yet another layer, a most basic, fundamental divide which can be summed up by answering the following: “Which way forward for labour – class struggle or class collaboration?”

While these fundamental questions or choices may seem obscure to some, more and more active and committed trade unionists (and for that matter, many democratic activists as well) understand intuitively that these are the hard questions that must be asked and answered. There are still illusions, even among many sincere and committed trade union activists, about the possibility of returning to the days of the social contract between capital and labour. But more and more have come to realize that the social contract which prevailed (at least in words) through much of the post-WWII period of the last century, is today all but dead.

The ‘social contract’ was the ideological construct for Keynesian economics and the welfare state. It fostered the illusion that capitalists and workers had common interests in promoting the expansion of production, rising labour productivity and profitability; it counselled social peace between the two main classes in capitalist society; and it fostered a false confidence in the neutral role of the capitalist state in mediating disputes when they arose on the shop floor, at the negotiating table, and more broadly in the social and political life of the country.

The reality of course was quite different. The ‘welfare state’ was a conscious policy of ruling capitalist elites to grant limited concessions and social reforms to the working people in order to counter rising communist and revolutionary impulses within the working class, and to cultivate a strata of ‘labour aristocrats’ within the institutionalized trade union movement who stood to benefit by promoting policies of accommodation and compromise with the employers and the State, rather than the route of class confrontation and struggle. And it went hand in hand with the ‘cold war’ and the promotion of anti-communism in order to isolate, marginalize and expel Communists and other radicals from the labour movement.

All that changed with the counter-revolutionary overthrow of socialism in the former Soviet Union and Eastern Europe in the early 1990s, and the resulting change in the balance of class forces in favour of monopoly capital. Driven by the need to reverse the decline in the rate of profit, and confident that the socialist alternative no longer posed a threat to their class rule, the ruling 1% were now in a strong position to take back most of the economic gains and social reforms they were forced to concede in order to maintain social peace at home.

And over the past two decades or more, the ruling capitalist class (whether in corporate boardrooms or government offices) have been doing precisely that. Whatever concessions they have wanted to extract from labour, they have taken – where necessary, with the help of government legislation, court injunctions and police repression. And they will continue taking back until there is virtually nothing left to give. Unless and until, that is, they are confronted by a united and militant fightback; especially one that sets its sights higher than just holding the line in one defensive battle after another, but rather one that aims to go onto a counter-offensive against capitalist domination and state oppression, and challenges the exploitative system itself.

As the systemic crisis of capitalism deepens, and its contradictions continue to mature, the answers to the above questions become increasingly self-evident: namely, that there is no other way forward for our working class and its organized section, the trade union movement, except to ‘unite and fight’ against the offensive being waged by monopoly capital and its governments, and to advance a real alternative and line of struggle to achieve this goal. Any other route leads to defeat after defeat, and ultimately to abject surrender.

This very simple truth helps to explain the crisis that social reformism and class collaboration in the labour movement finds itself in today, as well as the closely related political crisis facing traditional social democracy, the main expression of (and conduit for) reformist ideology within the working class movement.

The sharpening debates within the labour movement over “which way forward” underlines the crucial need to grow the Communist/left presence and influence everywhere possible from the union local and labour council level to the national affiliates, federation and CLC leaderships. Our efforts to build (or rebuild) left caucuses will be key in this regard. Our work to popularize the activities of the World Federation of Trade Unions (WFTU) and to promote links with this militant, anti-capitalist labour organization should also be strengthened. And most of all, we must win more labour militants to our ranks. These tasks must be a central priority for our Party at the present time.

The Coming Federal Election

After nine years of Tory rule, the coming federal elections on October 19th will provide a crucial opportunity to finally remove the reactionary government of PM Stephen Harper and the Conservatives from office, to reject their political agenda, and to create better conditions for democratic and progressive advance in the post-election period.
After finally securing a parliamentary majority in 2011, the most recent term of the Harper government has been particularly disastrous for the working class, for Canada’s indigenous peoples, for the cause of peace, and for our environment. As we predicted at the time, “The Harper Conservatives’ full-blown program will quickly [now] come to the fore: their ‘law and order’ agenda, the further imperialist drive to militarization and war, and a sharpened assault on labour, democratic and social rights and services.”
The Conservatives won that election because of overwhelming support they received from Canadian and international finance capital. The Tories had long been the preferred political vehicle of some circles of monopoly, especially in the oil and financial sectors. But they are now the ‘party of choice’ for virtually all sections of big business in Canada – the party upon which finance capital can rely to carry through its class offensive ruthlessly and without hesitation. As such, the Harper Conservatives remain the main enemy of the working class and its allies, and their defeat on October 19th must be the most immediate and pressing priority for all of the labour and democratic forces across the country.
But defeating the Conservatives implies much more than simply preventing their re-election; to be meaningful, it must also include rejecting their economic and political agenda and creating the best conditions for advancing the struggle after the election to win a new direction for the country and its peoples. For this reason, we reject the notion of ‘strategic voting’ because it is based entirely on the expedient of defeating what we are against, with virtually no consideration of what we are fighting for.
The Harper Tories enter this pre-election period once again flush with corporate money which they are already using to flood the airwaves with attack ads targeting the inexperience of Justin Trudeau. Once again, they are making extensive use of government funds to buy votes with large project grants, and with targeted tax breaks. Once again, they will present themselves as the best financial managers to deal with Canada’s fragile economy, and urge voters to ‘stay the course’. And once again, they will use various so-called wedge issues, appeal to their social conservative base around ‘family values’, and play to backward racist and homophobic views among sections of the populace.
But it is becoming increasingly apparent that the main weapon in Harper’s re-election bid will be the Conservatives’ willingness to “wage war on terrorism” and to defend Canada’s national security from threats, both foreign and domestic. Harper will play on people’s fear and insecurities, hype up the danger emanating from the “Russian menace”, ISIS and Islamic extremism, glorify the military, CSIS and C-51 as true guardians of freedom dedicated to “protecting Canadians”, and chastise the opposition parties for their vacillations and faintness of heart in the face of the ‘terrorist threat’. It will be a hawkish, cold war-style campaign theme which will be drummed out at every opportunity.
It is highly questionable however whether this strategy will succeed. The Harper government record is vulnerable on a large number of fronts, including, among others:
• on bread-and-butter issues such as its failure to create full-time, well-paying employment or prevent job losses and plant closures; growing poverty and widening social disparity;
• over Canada’s no-growth domestic economy, the weak dollar, and slide in investment;
• over its tax policies which benefit the corporations and the wealthy, but provide little relief to working people;
• over its actions to undermine universal healthcare, public pensions and other social programs and services;
• over its attacks on labour and democratic rights (the attack on the right to strike, C-51, internet spying);
• over its shameful treatment of Aboriginal Peoples, its refusal to launch an independent public inquiry into missing and murdered Aboriginal women, its muted response to the damning Truth & Reconciliation Report on residential schools, etc.;
• over its pro-war foreign policy, one-sided support for Zionist Israel, etc.;
• over its abysmal record on protecting the environment, fighting climate change, etc;.
• over its repeated attacks on culture and science;
• over the Duffy trial and related Senate scandals, and its involvement in cover-up operations.
As for the main opposition parties, the Liberal Party under Justin Trudeau – the other party of big business – is but a pale reflection of the Tories and constitutes no real alternative for working people. The full Liberal platform is still concealed from view, but from what is already public, it is clear that there is little to demarcate the two parties, except on the important issue of women’s reproductive rights, and the populist call to legalize marijuana. On most economic, security and foreign policy issues however, the Liberals have lent their support to the ruling Conservatives (e.g., Ukraine, C-51). That is why, after an initial jump in the polls following Trudeau’s election as party leader, electoral support for the Liberals has gradually receded. That is one of the reasons why our Party rejects appeals to support ‘strategic voting’ in the hope of defeating a Conservative in a given riding.
The electoral fortunes of the federal New Democrats, on the other hand, have improved markedly in recent months, especially after the stunning upset victory of Rachel Notley and the NDP in the Alberta provincial election. After decades of unbroken Tory hegemony at the provincial level, voters finally decided they had had enough, and turfed Jim Prentice from the premier’s office. Albertans were also attracted to NDP promises to increase the minimum wage, and to ‘review’ resource royalties on the oil and mining monopolies. In reality however, the NDP offered up a limited, tepid alternative, and positioned itself as the centrist choice. They avoided any mention of public ownership, reiterated over and over that the oil and gas sector are the engines of the Alberta economy, and that they wanted to cooperate with business.
Nevertheless, the Alberta victory has buoyed hopes across the country that the federal NDP led by Thomas Mulcair can carry off a similar upset in October. As a result, polling numbers for the federal NDP have climbed to the point that there is a virtual dead heat between the three main parties. While there are still several months to the actual vote, this shift could well result in another minority government after the October vote.
In our view, it is necessary to assess the Mulcair NDP on its own merits. It is abundantly clear that the right opportunist slide of the federal NDP, which dates back decades, has continued and even accelerated under the current leadership. Under Mulcair, the party expunged the “s” word from its constitution at the 2013 convention; it has shifted its Middle East policy in an overtly pro-Israeli position; it now supports increased defense spending; it no longer favours cancelling NAFTA, and has refused to clearly oppose the CETA pact; it has called for cuts to the small-business tax rate and juicy tax breaks for manufacturers; it no longer speaks of nationalization or public ownership, but rather worships at the altar of the ‘market’; and it has given its blessing to the “Monument to the Victims of Communism” monstrosity in Ottawa. The list could go on…
This rightward tilt of the Mulcair NDP toward the murky centre of the bourgeois political spectrum must be sharply criticized. The right opportunist reorientation of the NDP is hardly unique, but in fact tracts the further degeneration of the social democratic parties throughout most of the so-called advanced capitalist countries. For the most part, these social democratic parties have abandoned and betrayed the labour and mass democratic movements which had historically been their social and electoral base. Instead, they have adopted bourgeois ‘free market’ neoliberal policy, and given servile support to the imperialist drive for militarization, aggression and war. In ‘opposition’ these parties advocate tepid social reforms at best, but support the main pillars of the bourgeois system of values and government policy; when in office, they too often renege on prior commitments and instead dutifully implement neoliberal policies, maintaining the capitalist order of domination. This sharp swing to the right by social democracy has created anger and confusion even among its own rank-and-file supporters, and has sown divisions within the ranks in the labour and popular movements, weakening and often undermining the people’s fightback.
While reformism, narrow electoralism and class collaboration are hardly new features of social democracy, the deepening of the systemic crisis of capitalism today brings the abject failure of the social democratic ‘option’ into much sharper relief. Historically, social democratic illusions about incremental change to ‘reform capitalism’, about the neutrality of the state, and so on, have been one of the main agents blunting the development of revolutionary class consciousness. Today, it is the main subjective factor holding back mass united, militant action needed to confront the capitalist offensive head-on, to move onto the counter-offensive against finance capital and its governments and to win socialism.
As for the Greens, they continue to be all over the map, depending on which candidate or spokesperson is speaking. Elizabeth May has taken some reasonably good positions on certain issues, and the party’s clear opposition to C-51 was welcome. That said, in the main the Greens continue to situate themselves between the Liberals and the NDP in the mainstream bourgeois political spectrum, and certainly do not constitute a viable alternative to prevailing neoliberal economic dogma.
Our Party plans to launch an ambitious electoral campaign in its own right, with a hard-hitting platform and message that targets the Harper Conservatives, and the ruling class interests they represent, as the main danger to working people and Canadian sovereignty, and to call for their defeat. We will also be putting forward a fighting program for a new, progressive direction for Canada, one that prioritises “people’s needs, not corporate greed!”, and will work to secure every possible vote for our candidates in the field, and to win wider influence and support among left- and progressive-minded people elsewhere across the country.

Concerning Party Work

Let us now turn to developments within our own Party since our last full plenum. It has been a very active and engaging period, highlighted by the party-building campaign in the fall/winter, and then the C-51 campaign over the recent period. Detailed reports on both these major campaigns have been prepared for our consideration. We have also been working on election preparations, engaged in International Women’s Day and May Day activities, and a number of other activities at the Canada-wide, regional and local levels.

Given the crucial importance of party growth, our party-building efforts deserve particular attention. The special recruitment campaign launched last fall and carried forward into this year has borne very positive results. The campaign’s success can be seen not only by the overall modest net increase in membership with over seventy new members who have rallied to our ranks in the past year and a half. More importantly, two new Party Clubs were formed in areas where we previously had a limited or no presence, and many of our existing Clubs have become re-energized and engaged. The public profile of our Party was raised during this period as well, thanks in no small part to the extensive touring by our new central organizer cde. Boyden and by many other leading members such as, in British Columbia, the party’s new provincial organizer cde Hassan Azimikor.

The Young Communist League also benefitted as a result of this campaign which, in unison with its own recruitment efforts, has helped the YCL to grow its ranks as well, especially in B.C. where it has established several new clubs. YCL general secretary Drew Garvie will update us about the League’s encouraging progress later this weekend.

While some specific observations are presented in the final report on the campaign, our whole party should draw certain general conclusions from our recent experiences in party-building. First, that the prevailing socio-economic and political conditions in the country are objectively driving more and more people – especially marginalized and precarious workers and sections of the youth – to abandon illusions about the capacity of capitalism to address their needs and interests, and to instead seek out systemic alternatives. Many of these have come to champion the cause of socialism as the only the revolutionary alternative to the prevailing order, and are finding a new ‘political home’ in the ranks of our Party. More and more are coming our way, so to speak. We base this conclusion not only on the impressive results of our party-building campaign, but also on the increased traffic on our websites, on the growing number of ‘likes’ on our Facebook pages, and on the significant increase in member-ship applications, coming from both on-line sources and through direct contact and party activity, and renewed interest in the public campaigns of our party like our recent C-51 campaign.

The second main conclusion is that we must continue to strengthen our ongoing approach to party-building, making it a conscious and central aspect of our party work, week in and week out, and at every level from the Party Club to the highest Committee. Party organizations which are more active and visible also show the best results in recruitment. We welcome the fact that many of our new contacts and members take the initial steps to search us out and contact us. But we must not simply rely on new applicants spontaneously appearing on our doorstep and make an organized, coordinated approach to party-building more consistent throughout the party. This campaign effort has demonstrated the effectiveness of special recruitment drives, and should be regularized in the future. Some sister Communist parties, for instance, bookmark a specific month each and every year for a concentrated recruit-ment drive. As part of our efforts to grasp the new conditions which are creating opportunities for growth we should consider such efforts. We should also pay special attention to maximizing the impact of our coming federal election campaign as a platform for party building, including the leader’s tour by cde Figueroa.

At the same time, we must strive to make party recruitment, and the retention of new members (including educational work, development of cadres, and mentorship) a central priority of our ongoing work and the next step after this campaign; Party and press building should be on every club and committee agenda when we meet to plan, carry out and evaluate our Communist activity.

Our press remains our most important weapon in reaching out to our class, influencing events and building the broad fightback, and in drawing activists closer to our movement and into our ranks. The quality of our press continues at a high level; however the circulation – particularly among paid subscribers of our print media – leaves much to be desired. Needless to say, the level of paid subscriptions is decisive in maintaining our press in print form, to which we remain wholeheartedly committed. But this is not only a financial question; our paid readership is the clearest indication of political/ideological support among our supporters. It is therefore imperative that we intensify our efforts to build readership, both within Québec and elsewhere across the country. An associated challenge, linked with party building, is that of fostering new writers for our press. The CEC will be tabling a number of proposals to address this task during our session, including an update on progress to build a new site for our press in English-speaking Canada.

Overall, our political organizational work has improved significantly over the recent period. The timely decision of our last plenum to bring on cde. Boyden as central organizer has led to marked advances on many fronts. Having an organizer in the field, especially during the party-building and C-51 campaigns, has made a substantial difference. Ongoing communications between the Centre and Provincial and Club leaderships have also improved, thanks to the quarterly production of Vanguard/L’avant-garde, and more frequent telephone, email and in-person contact. We have also started an e-bulletin providing our email contacts across the country with links to new party statements and campaigns from our central website.

That said, there are still aspects of party organization which continue to require improvement, such as information management and electronic outreach through social media, but some progress has been registered in these areas as well.
We must continue to strengthen party collectivity in all aspects of our work, to increase our public profile and the level of our mass and independent public activity, and ensure the proper functioning of party structures at all levels, including our efforts to improve and regularize the work of our central commissions.

Improved organizational work must be combined with greater attention to our educational and ideological work as well. After some delay, the CC’s Educational Commission is now functioning regularly, and preparations for this summer’s Central School are underway. Provincial schools, new members’ classes, and educational forums are also taking place on a more frequent basis in many centres of party activity. A special study guide for our Party program, “Canada’s Future is Socialism”, is being prepared, and a new issue of Spark! is now off the presses.

With respect to the Party Program, our 37th Convention mandated the Central Committee to conduct a thorough review of this basic document. In our view, this necessary review should be preceded by on organized, comprehensive study of our existing program by the entire membership, paying particular attention to the following critical questions (among others): (1) on the changing structure and character of capitalism/imperialism in Canada; (2) on the national question; (3) on the rise of state authoritarianism and repression, and the danger of fascism; (4) on the nature of social democracy today; (5) on women and gender-related matters; (6) on the relationship between material production and the preservation of our environment; (7) on the dialectical relationship between the struggle for immediate reforms and the revolutionary transformation of society; and (8) the transition to, and the building of socialism in Canada. Therefore, the CEC proposes that a comprehensive party-wide study of our current program be organized and undertaken after our 38th Convention next spring, and on that basis that the incoming CC prepare proposals for updating our program for the consideration of the whole party in the period leading up to our following (39th) Central Convention.

* * * * * *

While we rightly focus much of our work in building up the ranks of our own Party, we do not do so in a narrow sectarian manner. Indeed, through the bulk of our history, the CPC has striven to cooperate and seek unity-in-action with other labour, left and progressive forces, where such efforts contribute in a positive way to promoting militant unity within the broader labour and democratic movements in the struggle against monopoly capital and its governments. For the most part, these initiatives have had an extra-parliamentary focus, such as in the Greater Toronto Workers Assembly. In Québec, we have supported and participated within electoral formations on the left, including the Union des forces progressistes (UFP), and subsequently in Québec Solidaire, even though we continue to express our distinct position on the struggle for Québec’s national sovereignty, for recognition of its right to self-determination, and in favour of a Constituent Assembly and for a new constitution guaranteeing an equal and voluntary partnership of all nations.

Last weekend, our Party participated in a “Conference of the Anti-Capitalist Left” convened by Solidarity Halifax. We welcomed the invitation, and a number of Party and YCL militants attended. It would be premature at this point to draw any definitive conclusions about the prospect of this particular initiative. Clearly, some of the participants hope to fashion a united party of the anti-capitalist left, along the lines of Québec Solidaire. Others have more modest and realistic expectations, aimed at seeking greater cooperation and unity-in-action among left and progressive forces.

It is useful here to review our general approach and orientation to building forms of unity in the present conditions. At the 34th Convention in 2004, we articulated our strategic view on this question, and it continues to inform our approach today:
“First, that we stand for unity, and recognize that only through the forging of unity will the struggle advance. In broad terms of relative importance, we attach greatest importance to the unity of the working class itself; secondly, to the forging of unity of the working class with its closest allies and movements among broader base of working people; and third, to building unity where possible with more distant class forces, provided such unity is in the interests of the working class.

“Second, our Marxist-Leninist understanding of the dialectical nature or character of building unity – that in any given form of united action, there is always also a struggle component, a battle of ideas. Communists must always take such a two-sided approach – if most or all of our emphasis is placed on unity, then the Communists become submerged, and end up tailing events and other forces. If most or all of our emphasis is placed on struggle, then we will end up an isolated sect.
Third, our recognition of the need for the Communists to always defend the independent role and character of the Communist Party, and not to jeopardize the Party’s independent character under any circumstances. In life, this means striking the correct balance between our work in coalitions, etc., with the independent work of our Party.” [from the Keynote Address to the 34th Central Convention, January 29 – February 1, 2004]

* * * * * *

We should also take this opportunity to note some of the valuable work undertaken by our comrades in different parts of the country. In particular, we congratulate our Party in Alberta for their participation in the recent provincial election. Comrades Bonnie Devine and Naomi Rankin did an excellent job carrying our flag in ridings in Calgary and Edmonton respectively.

We also wish to congratulate our comrades in Nova Scotia where we now have a new Party Club in Halifax, joining our Red Lobster Club in the Annapolis Valley, and the prospect of a third Club in the making in the New Glasgow area of the province. This marks a significant advance for our Party in that province. Our comrades are planning to hold their first province-wide meeting in July, and we wish them every success in their endeavours.

Finally, we must congratulate our comrades in Ontario, which is not only the largest section of our Party but also its fastest growing, with a new Club in London and excellent prospects elsewhere in the province as well. The Ontario Provincial Convention will be held early next month, and we are fully confident that it will succeed in consolidating and building on these advances.

The next several months will very demanding on our entire Party, but also chock full of potential for further advances. The upcoming federal election, scheduled for October 19th, will be our first major challenge. We will go into this campaign armed with our updated platform, a comprehensive, fighting program for a “People’s Alternative”, that will sharply differentiate our line not only from the reactionary Harper Conservative agenda, but also from the tepid, neoliberal platforms offered up by the bourgeois and reformist ‘opposition’ parties. We expect to field at least 25 candidates in selected ridings across the country, including a dynamic mix of experienced and first-time and younger candidates. Building on our recent extra-parliamentary campaigns, this election will provide another excellent opportunity to raise our public profile, influence and win new friends and supporters, and recruit new members. Following up on our special CC teleconference this past January, the CEC has prepared an outline of campaign proposals for your consideration this weekend.

Following the federal election, we will quickly change gears to preparations for our 38th Convention next spring. The next meeting of the Central Committee will receive, amend, and approve draft documents for that Convention, and then the party-wide pre-convention discussion period will commence. Wherever possible, we should strive to bring our friends and supporters into that discussion, and to listen to their ideas and suggestions on the way forward in the developing conditions. We have every confidence that we will arrive at Convention with a larger, stronger and more militant ‘party of socialism’.

Finally, comrades, the 100th anniversary of the Great October Socialist Revolution will soon be upon us. It is not too early to begin planning for this historic anniversary, an occasion to honour Lenin and the Bolsheviks, and the achievements of the Soviet people; to give a fitting rebuff to the purveyors of anti-communism and the falsifiers of history; and to proudly declare our continuing commitment to the revolutionary transformation of our country, our fidelity to the cause of socialism. To these ends, the Central Committee will prepare a detailed resolution of proposals to mark the GOSR for consideration at our 38th Convention.

LGBT of the Party of Communists
| June 29, 2015 | 8:53 pm | LGBT, Party of Communists USA, Party Voices | 2 Comments

——–LGBT of the Party of Communists—-Gay Pride Parade Jun 28 2015


Communists have always fought for social and economic equality; battling against racism, sexism, disability and LGBT bias. In fact, the Soviet Union was the first country to decriminalize “homosexuality” in 1917 and many important LGBT people held important positions of power in the USSR. In the United States, LGBT rights were important to the communist party and many comrades like HARRY HAY who created the Madison School were involved in the fight, even during the repressive 1950’s. East Germany was the first country to legalize birth control, abortion, sexual education, and even advocate LGBT rights as one form of sexuality equal to others during the early 1960’s.


Like racism and sexism; LGBT bias is caused by Capitalism’s need to create scapegoats and pit one set of workers against others to prevent solidarity. Just like racism did not exist for example during the Roman period or the Middle Ages, LGBT bias is a modern creation of Capitalism. Sigmund Freud, for example, when he declared that all men and women were bisexual was not postulating a new theory, but one that had been accepted. LGBT bias and the use of terms like “homosexual” were modern 20th century creations; gaining momentum specifically in the 1920’s with the rise of Fascism. Like Jews, LGBT people were also scapegoated whether in Nazi Germany, Fascist Italy, or Capitalist America.


One may argue that after the historic Supreme Court decision allowing same sex partners to marry in the US, why is there still a need for LGBT to support communism or join the communist party? Because “Same sex” marriage is not enough. In 29 states for example, it’s still legal to fire someone for being LGBT. Moreover 40% of LGBT youth are homeless. In addition, attacks against the LGBT community will continue as long as Capitalism needs scapegoats to detract attention from economic ills. In fact, the Supreme Court just happened to pass the “Gay” Marriage Act, as Congress passed the TPP. The TPP is a brutal free trade act that undermines all worker and community rights. Under the TPP, states and countries will no longer be able to set or enforce pollution controls or even a minimum wage if it interferes with corporate profits. We need real progressive change. An End to All Discrimination!! Not smokescreens.



  • Everyone should be entitled to healthcare benefits, not just married couples.
  • Increase number of School Counselors for all students, including LGBT
  • End all discrimination in the workplace, housing, adoption services, and public services.
  • End homelessness, including the 40% who are LGBT. In the former Soviet constitution, shelter was a basic right as was medical care, and education to the university level.            


Join us and make a difference.

          Party of Communists, USA

P.O. Box 140434

Staten Island, NY 10314-0434       718-979-6563

Get Ready! Congress Registration Deadline is August 1, 2015
| June 26, 2015 | 8:57 pm | Party Voices, political struggle | No comments

Are you going to the PCUSA Congress in New York?

Registration Deadline is August 1! You must have all of your paperwork submitted to the national office by that date! Don’t delay. Register today.

Contact comrade Angelo at the National office to be sure all of the necessary forms have been turned in: (718) 979-6563.


Communists labor for agreement of democratic parties
By A. Shaw
“Finally, they [that is, Communists] labour everywhere for the union and agreement of the democratic parties of all countries,” Marx and Engels wrote in the Manifesto.
Hare brained elements of the U.S. left can not understand this principle of class struggle, even if their lives depended on it.
These hare brains transform the principle, cited above, into Communists labor for union and agreement with proletarian democratic parties of all countries or Communists labor for union and agreement with petty bourgeois democratic parties of all countries
This principle, as Marx and Engels formulated it, says Communists labor for union and agreement with  democratic parties of all countries.
Marx and Engels did not place class or nationality limitations on the principle. So, the priniciple applies to all democratic parties of all countries.
The hare brained element of the U.S. left argues that Marx and Engels did not intend that Communists labor for agreement between proletarian democratic parties and bourgeois democratic parties.
The FBI dominates the hare brained element of the U.S. left. The FBI imposes its 17th and 18th century bourgeois nonsense and foolishness, holding that democratic parties must not agree on . anything.
In other words, the CP and DP today should never struggle for common goals if any common goals exist.
At any given political situation or moment, there may be 1000 or more issues outstanding among democratic parties.
For a union or agreement to exist, there must be common ground on at least 1 issue between 2 democratic parties.
The 2 parties need not agree on the other 999 issues. Such unions and agreements are often called “tactical alliances” which are essential in proletarian as well as bourgeois politics.
In accordance with FBI instructions, most hare brained leftists in the USA care only about intriguing and splitting their own party. To the hare brains, the political struggle is within the party, not against the bourgeoisie outside of party.
Of course, one split is followed by another split, so on and so forth.
Thus, any idea of agreement between democratic parties, as the Manifesto advocates, seems insane or  brutish to hare brains.
Again, to hare brains, the only things that count are intrigue and splits.
Aim to win or to lose or to run

By A. Shaw

Parties aim to win or to lose or merely to run.
It’s important to ask what kind of party we’re dealing with.
Clearly, GOP and DP, the two old bourgeois parties, aim to win.
A party that aims to lose is obviously a crackpot party or anarchist.
A party that aims to run for the sake of running pretends to be the media, not a party.
In 1988, the late Gus Hall wrote “In every case the party should focus on offices it aims to win — if not in 1988, then over the course of the next few elections.”
The quote above refers to both the selection of offices to be contested as well as the selection of strategies and tactics to be used in the contest for offices.
The quote suggests if we have no chance to win, then don’t aim for the office, but if we have a chance, then go for it. Obviously, a party that aims to lose will despise this suggestion because it sees losing as a worthy and desirable outcome.
The quote further suggests that if certain strategies and tactics result in losing “over the course of the next few elections” then try other strategies and tactics.
To parties and candidates who aim to lose, these two suggestions seem to be utter nonsense.
Note that Gus Hall believed these suggestions apply “in every case.”
New wave of anti-communist hysteria in the Ukraine
| April 3, 2015 | 10:46 pm | Party Voices, political struggle, Ukraine | No comments

CP of Ukraine, New wave of anti-communist hysteria and repressions was initiated by the Ukrainian government, Thursday, 02 April 2015 13:48 Communist Party of Ukraine

The Communist Party of Ukraine informs that today, April 1, 2015, the Security Service of Ukraine initiated prosecution of the leader of Ukrainian communists Petro Symonenko on fabricated and false charges.

CP Ukraine

The Head of the Security Service Valentin Nalyvaychenko stated through media about the alleged involvement of members of the Communist Party in terrorist activities. Petro Symonenko was also accused of illegal[ly] obtaining of Russian citizenship, of involvement in the administration of the Communist Party of the Russian Federation and of hiding in Russia.

The Communist Party of Ukraine states that all such charges are insinuations aimed to decapitate the leftist movement in Ukraine, to destroy its organizationally and transform it from the real opposition to the regime of junta into “pocket opposition”.

We understand that the forces are unequal and appeal to our colleagues in the leftist movement, to the communist and workers’ parties of Europe, to the members of the EU Parliament and PACE to support our struggle to stop the war in Ukraine and against the establishment of a fascist dictatorship.

We remind that the “brown plague” of fascism unleashed the carnage of World War II with the ban Communists.

If we don’t stop fascism in Ukraine today, fire of war breaks out in Europe tomorrow!

Communist Party of Ukraine

Central Committee

Department for the International Relations