Category: National
No to war with Russia!
| February 9, 2015 | 8:01 pm | Action, International, National, political struggle, Russia, Ukraine | Comments closed

Hi,

President Barack Obama, Vice President Joe Biden, Secretary of State John Kerry and Senator John McCain have dishonored the people of the United States by their support of the fascist government in the Ukraine. Any military assistance to the anti-Semitic, anti-worker government in the Ukraine would be an act of provocation towards Russia. Working people do not need a war with Russia which without doubt would be catastrophic to Europe and the United States at the very least. We must not forget that we can all be cremated equally!

That’s why I created a petition to The United States House of Representatives, The United States Senate, and President Barack Obama, which says:

“We oppose sending military support of any kind to the fascist government in the Ukraine!”

Will you sign this petition? Click here:

http://petitions.moveon.org/sign/no-to-war-with-russia?source=c.em.mt&r_by=8638452

 

Thanks!

How You Can Help the Striking Oil Workers – USW?
| February 6, 2015 | 9:52 pm | Action, Labor, Local/State, National | Comments closed
 
  • Donations:  Food (non perishable), Diapers, Food Gift Cards
Deliver to:  USW, Local 13-1, 311 Pasadena Blvd, Pasadena Texas 77506 or 2527 Texas Avenue, Texas City 77590 and to USW, Local 13-227, 704 E. Pasadena Fwy, Pasadena, Texas 77506.
  • Monetary Donations
Mail to or deliver to:  USW, Local 13-1, Strike Assistance, 311 Pasadena Blvd., Pasadena, Texas 77506 and to USW, Local 13-227, 704 E. Pasadena Fwy, Pasadena, Texas 77506
  • Picketing Assistance
Report to USW, Local 13-1, 311 Pasadena Blvd., Pasadena, Texas 77506 – or USW, Local 13-1227, 704 E. Pasadena Fwy, Pasadena, Texas 77506.  You will be assigned a Gate
Stand with Senator Bernie Sanders: Make secret trade agreements public
| February 6, 2015 | 9:46 pm | Action, Analysis, Bernie Sanders, Economy, National, political struggle | Comments closed

http://act.credoaction.com/sign/Bernie_Sanders_TPP?

 Stand with Senator Bernie Sanders: Make secret trade agreements public

Republicans in the new Congress have already launched a backdoor attack against Social Security and moved to gut Wall Street reforms with more bailout for big banks. And now they are working with the Obama administration for the next big item on their agenda – a titanic corporate power grab called the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP).

We need to fight now to ensure the American public, which has purposefully been kept in the dark about the TPP, knows exactly what is in it.

Fortunately, Senator Bernie Sanders is fired up. He is championing the public interest by demanding the Obama Administration make public the content of all trade agreements such as the TPP.1 And, this is a key moment for us to stand with him.

Tell President Obama: Make the full text of all pending trade agreements public.

Trade agreements such as the TPP are being negotiated behind closed doors by the governments of a dozen countries (including ours) in collusion with corporate interests. This secret “trade” deal would eviscerate broad swaths of regulations that protect consumers, workers, the environment and the soundness of our financial system. And it would set up a legal regime where corporate profits trump the policy priorities of sovereign governments.

Under a trade agreement such as the TPP, more American jobs would be offshored. Internet freedom would be a joke. Developing countries would lose access to lifesaving medicines. Unsafe foods and products could pour into our country while we’re powerless to stop them. Gone would be the days when the United States could regulate coal exports. The excesses of our crazy intellectual property laws that privilege corporate control over innovation would be both exacerbated and extended internationally. And, that’s just the tip of the iceberg.

Soon congress will be taking up “Fast Track” legislation which would short-circuit the typical legislative process when trade deals like the TPP come up for a vote. In fact, the reason the corporate lobby is pushing hard for Fast Track is that they know the TPP could not get through Congress without this extraordinary power grab.

You might think a far-reaching proposal such as the TPP would be subject to intense public debate. But the text of the proposed deal is considered classified by our government and even members of Congress have been given extremely limited access to it.

The little we do know about the deal we know because drafts of some of its chapters were leaked last year.

Yet, while the government has kept the public and Congress largely in the dark about the TPP, it has given 600 corporate advisers access to the full text of the proposal. As Senator Sanders has demanded, President Obama’s trade negotiators must “stop operating in the shadows and come clean with details of an agreement.”2

Tell President Obama: Make the full text of all pending trade agreements public.

Senator Elizabeth Warren has warned that trade deals like the TPP could provide an opportunity for “banks to get something done quietly out of sight that they could not accomplish in a public place with the cameras rolling and the lights on.”3

Indeed, leaked chapters of the TPP included provisions that would majorly hamstring the ability of governments to stem the next banking crisis.4

Other provisions would allow multinational corporations to sue governments in foreign courts that are staffed by corporate lawyers when governmental regulations cut into corporate profit.5

It would be outrageous for the Obama Administration to allow the Republican leadership and their corporate allies within the Democratic party to ram through Fast Track, without allowing all members of Congress, their staff, and the American public to read what is in trade agreements such as the TPP.

This is why Senator Sanders is demanding the Obama administration to at least follow the example of the European Union which has already published the full text of a separate proposed trade agreement with the United States.6

Stand with Senator Sanders by demanding President Obama to immediately release the full text of all pending trade agreements.

Thank you for speaking out. Your activism matters

  1. Senator Bernie Sanders’ letter to United States Trade Representative, January 5, 2015.
  2. Senator Bernie Sanders’ press release, “Sanders Contrasts U.S. Trade Secrecy to EU Transparency,” Sanders.senate.gov, January 7, 2015.
  3. Kate Davidson, “Elizabeth Warren: Trade talks could weaken bank oversight,” Politico, May 8, 2013.
  4. Zach Carter, “Obama Faces Backlash Over New Corporate Powers In Secret Trade Deal,” Huffington Post, Dec. 08, 2013
  5. Ibid.
  6. Senator Bernie Sanders’ press release, “Sanders Contrasts U.S. Trade Secrecy to EU Transparency.”
How DP and GOP big shots see the DP primary race
| February 6, 2015 | 9:37 pm | Analysis, Bernie Sanders, National, political struggle | Comments closed
A. Shaw
The establishment caste of  both of the bourgeois parties, DP and GOP, are going crazy over the probable presence of Sen. Bernie Sanders in the DP presidential primary.
Democratic Party ( the “DP”)
Why are the privileged strata of the two bourgeois parties going crazy over Sanders’ candidacy?
Some of the DP big shots made this observation about the DP primary race “Sanders could do relatively well in liberal Iowa and neighboring N.H. and embarrass Clinton, with no long-range damage.”
The DPs love to BS, such as when they say “Sanders could do relatively well in liberal Iowa and neighboring N.H.  and embarrass Clinton.”
Clearly, the DP big shots know that Sanders is going to beat Clinton in Iowa and N.H. So, the DP big shots try to belittle the significance of Clinton’s early defeats. The big shot DPs claim that early defeats of Clinton  will not cause “long-range damage” to Clinton’s campaign.
This is BS. These early defeats will destroy Clinton’s campaign.
THE GOP
The GOP big shots resemble the DP big shots when the former pretend that Clinton’s defeats in early primary states, like Iowa and N.H., are not important.
Some GOPs said “Her biggest problem is in the White House, not Iowa or New Hampshire.”
These asinine GOPs pretend that Clinton can get to the White House without winning early primary states.
CONCLUSION
If Clinton stumbles early in the race for the 2016 DP presidential nomination, she will most likely fall further and further behind the frontrunners.
The opinions of DP and GOP big shots are worthless because only two months ago these big shots were absolutely
certain that Clinton had these early primary states in her purse.
Democrats In Full Revolt As Republican Netanyahu Speech Scheme Completely Backfires
| February 6, 2015 | 9:19 pm | Analysis, National, political struggle | Comments closed
more from Jason Easley
http://www.politicususa.com/2015/02/05/democrats-full-revolt-republican-netanyahu-speech-scheme-completely-backfires.html

Thursday, February, 5th, 2015, 3:04 pm

Netanyahu-boehner-obama

Republicans and Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu are facing potential humiliation as congressional Democrats are in full revolt and refusing to attend the Israeli leader’s planned speech before Congress.

Politico reported that a meeting to try to end the Democratic revolt has only served to make things worse:

Israeli Ambassador Ron Dermer and Knesset Speaker Yuli Edelstein rushed to meetings on Capitol Hill on Wednesday trying to calm a furor created by Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s planned speech to Congress next month and quell a Democratic revolt that has dozens threatening a boycott.

It didn’t work.

If anything, Democrats finished the day more frustrated. According to a source in the room, one Jewish Democratic member of Congress even accused Dermer of being insincere when he claimed not to have anticipated the partisan uproar he’d ignite when he skirted protocol and went around the White House and scheduled the speech only with House Speaker John Boehner.

The White House isn’t providing any guidance to congressional Democrats, but the reports that Vice President Biden may skip Netanyahu’s speech are a powerful non-verbal signal. Anyone with an ounce of political sense understands that Boehner and Netanyahu cooked up this scheme in order to humiliate the president and pressure him to drop the nuclear talks with Iran. Republicans misread the political landscape. Boehner assumed that his Netanyahu invitation would divide Democrats and split what he presumed was a weakened Democratic Party.

The exact opposite has happened. The Democrats have emerged from the 2014 midterm as a revived party. Their resurgence has been powered by President Obama. The president has seen his poll numbers steadily increase as he has chosen to take on Republicans on a number of issues. Democrats have formed a unified front with their president that has led to Republicans struggling to get their agenda off of the ground.

Boehner and Netanyahu have entered damage control mode. They can’t cancel Netanyahu’s address, so the conservatives are trying to get Democrats on board. The prospect of Netanyahu addressing Congress and looking out upon dozens to hundreds of empty seats is becoming very real. Democrats are rebelling against the speech in order to expose it as the partisan stunt that it is.

The entire fiasco could have been avoided if Netanyahu and Boehner had followed protocol instead of attempting to humiliate the President Of The United States.

Boehner and Netanyahu’s scheme to humiliate Obama has backfired into an embarrassing public disaster for the conservatives.
Democrats In Full Revolt As Republican Netanyahu Speech Scheme Completely Backfires was written by Jason Easley for PoliticusUSA.
© PoliticusUSA, Thu, Feb 5th, 2015 — All Rights Reserved
Bernie Sanders is right to be outraged
| February 6, 2015 | 8:57 pm | Analysis, Bernie Sanders, Economy, National | Comments closed

 

http://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/dana-milbank-bernie-sanders-is-right-to-be-outraged/2015/01/30/d5f17576-a886-11e4-a06b-9df2002b86a0_story.html

By Dana Milbank Opinion writer January 30

Bernie Sanders is in his natural state – of agitation.

It’s just 9 a.m., but the socialist senator, contemplating a presidential run as a Democrat or as a populist independent, is red in the face and his white hair askew. In a conference room at The Washington Post, he’s raising his voice, thumping his index finger on the table and gesturing so wildly that his hand comes within inches of political reporter Karen Tumulty’s face.

“We are living in the United States right now at a time when the top one-tenth of 1 percent own more wealth than the bottom 90 percent,” the Vermont lawmaker says in his native Brooklyn accent.

Legislative branch of US bourgeois regime grovels before Zionist chauvinists
| February 3, 2015 | 8:26 pm | Analysis, National, political struggle | Comments closed

Birds of a feather

When it comes to poking a finger in the eye of Barack Obama, John Boehner and Benjamin Netanyahu couldn’t be more on the same page.
Ignoring the well-established role of the executive as the branch of government with the lead role in the conduct of U.S. foreign policy, House Speaker John Boehner invited Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu to address a joint session of Congress without consulting or even informing the White House.
Netanyahu accepted, thus thumbing his nose at the chief executive of the one and only nation that lavishes Israel with billions of dollars annually, provides a panoply of the best weapons in the world, and shamelessly protects it diplomatically when that country is called to account at the United Nations and elsewhere for continual outrages against Palestinians and numerous violations of international law.
Something–or rather several things–are wrong with this picture.  First, there is the pattern sheer disrespect. No president in recent times has been the object of some of the brazen acts of disrespect that Barack Obama has had to endure.
Examples abound. Virtually on day one of Obama’s first presidency, the Republican Senate Minority leader declared that making Obama a one-term president would be his principal priority. Sometime later, on a visit to Washington at the invitation of Obama, Netanyahu had the temerity to publicly lecture his host at the White House.
Now, with Boehner’s invitation to address Congress and the Israeli leader’s acceptance, Netanyahu and House Republican leader John Boehner together are doing a most undiplomatic, embarrassing, and possibly unprecedented end run around the administration. This one takes the cake.
Why the disrespect? It’s not as if Obama started and illegal and disastrous war (Bush II, LBJ) or had a Monica moment (Clinton), or committed serious political crimes (Nixon). Herein hangs a tale–for another time.
The second thing wrong in this picture is that it amounts to an alliance between a U.S. political party and the leader of a foreign state to undermine U.S. foreign policy and at the same time score political points at home.
The United States and the other world powers have opted for a diplomatic rather than a bellicose approach to dealing with Iran’s nuclear program (albeit a diplomatic road reinforced by sanctions and explicit threats of military action).
This strategy has basically been working, despite bumps along the road. The leading Western countries, including the United States, have been moving toward reaching a framework agreement with Iran by March 31. They believe it would accomplish the ultimate goal of preventing the development of nuclear weapons by Iran.
There are all kinds of things wrong with this strategy for the bellicose Republican Congress and the pugnacious Israeli PM. So, they are working together to derail it. That’s the main goal of the scheduled Netanyahu appearance.
But there are important secondary potential gains for both parties as well. There are elections in Israel on March 17. It might be useful politically for Netanyahu to be seen by Israeli voters as a brave David defending Israel’s security against the perfidy of Goliath Obama. Congressional Republicans would especially enjoy Netanyahu’s inevitable hard shots at the Obama administration.
Netanyahu ultimately would like to see Obama abandon the diplomatic road and join Israel in a military strike against Iran. This works for Republicans too, who abhor Obama’s multilateral approach and prefer unilateral military action that shows the United States is a law onto itself ready and able to impose its will, all the better if that act of will defies international law.
All this worked so well in Iraq. Republicans seem to want a repeat performance. Or maybe they think they can get it right this time and thus erase the American people’s memory of the Iraq disaster. That memory acts as a check against more future military adventures such as the ones many Republicans would like to undeertake.
This ominous coming together of the hawks–Likudniks and Republicans– is, at another less portentous but nevertheless remarkable level, an alliance of the nasty. Nastiness is a hallmark of today’s Republican party, expressed in mean words and even meaner policies lacking all sense of social justice or even compassion.
Netanyahu is a good fit for these folks. If there were a Nobel Prize for the most obnoxious politician, he would win it. Recall the famous exchange at the 2011 G-20 Summit between Obama and then-French-president Nicholas Sarkozy that was supposed to be private but became very public. Sarkozy: “I cannot bear Netanyahu, he’s a liar.” Obama: “You’re fed up with him, but I have to deal with him even more often than you.”
This time, Obama is declining to deal with or even meet with Netanyahu if he comes to Washington, officially to preclude influencing the Israeli election. That’s a very convenient excuse. The real problem has not escaped critics in the United States and Israel. Rock-solid Republican elder and former Secretary of State James Baker has spoken out against the invitation as a breach of protocol. Israeli critics are calling Netanyahu’s move a cynical political ploy that may cost Israel dearly in the form of the solid bipartisan support it has long enjoyed.
Thus the seemingly clever gambit by Netanyahu and Boehner may yet backfire politically. That would not be a bad thing. The real danger is that it may work in its main objective, torpedoing the diplomatic approach toward Iran. Already, many members of Congress, including numerous Democrats, are inclined toward a more hard-line sanctions regime and are proposing legislation toward that end.
If the hardliners–the GOP, the Likud–get their wish and the United States at some point strikes military against Iran, there will be terrible consequences. If you think the things Al Qaeda and ISIS are doing are horrible–and they are–you don’t want to see what a state like Iran will do if attacked. The most radical elements in the country will almost surely come to power, with solid support from a furious Iranian public ready to back anyone and anything in order to strike back hard against those they will see as having perpetrated an unprovoked attack on their millenarian civilization and its people.
Progreso Semanal/ Weekly authorizes the total or partial reproduction of the articles by our journalists, so long as source and author are identified