Month: February, 2015
Netanyahu Lied to UN about Iranian Nuclear Program, Mossad Files Show
| February 26, 2015 | 9:25 pm | Analysis, International | Comments closed

 

*Special thanks to Martin J. Sawma for this special report

Leaked cables from Israel’s intelligence agency reveal Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu misled the United Nations about Iran’s nuclear program.

[Link to the document further below—MJS]. SputnikNews.com, 23:20 23.02.2015 (updated 05:22 24.02.2015)

http://sputniknews.com/us/20150223/1018653276.html

In Sept. 2012, Benjamin Netanyahu stood before the UN General Assembly with a cartoonish diagram of a bomb and warned that Iran was about a year away from completing its “plans of building a nuclear weapon,” calling for action to halt the process and justifying Israel’s rights to act militarily if necessary. “By next spring, at most by next summer, at current enrichment rates, they will have finished the medium enrichment and move[d] on to the final stage,” Netanyahu told the UN. “From there, it’s only a few months, possibly a few weeks before they get enough enriched uranium for the first bomb.”

But in Oct. 2012, Israel’s intelligence agency Mossad sent a top-secret cable to South Africa’s state security agency saying that the Islamic Republic was “not performing the activity necessary to produce weapons and doesn’t appear to be ready to enrich Uranium to the higher levels needed to the nuclear bomb,” according a secret cable obtained by Al Jazeera and shared with the Guardian. [Link to the document further below—MJS].

US intelligence found no evidence that Iran intended to use its nuclear infrastructure to build a bomb.

The report highlights the gulf between the alarmist tone in rhetoric taken by top Israeli politicians and the assessments of Israel’s military and intelligence apparatus, according to the Guardian.

The leaked documents also revealed details of operations against al-Qaeda, the Islamic State and other terrorist organizations.

Among the information leaked is a CIA attempt to establish contact with Hamas, South Korean intelligence targeting the leader of Greenpeace, Barack Obama “threatening” the Palestinian president to withdraw a bid for recognition of Palestine at the UN, and South African intelligence spying on Russia over a controversial $100 million joint satellite deal, according to the Guardian.

It comes at a time when political tensions between the US and Israel are at a record high, and ahead of Netanyahu’s planned address to the US Congress on March 3 to speak against the nuclear compromise currently being negotiated between Tehran and world powers.

Mossad contradicted Netanyahu on Iran nuclear programme

Spy Cables reveal Mossad concluded that Iran was not producing nuclear weapons, after PM sounded alarm at UN in 2012.

Will Jordan, Rahul Radhakrishnan |

Al Jazeera, 23 Feb 2015 19:20 GMT

http://www.aljazeera.com/news/2015/02/leaks-netanyahu-misled-iran-nuclear-programme-guardian-iran-nuclear-speech-2012-150218165622065.html Iran, Israel

Less than a month after Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s 2012 warning to the UN General Assembly that Iran was 70 per cent of the way to completing its “plans to build a nuclear weapon”, Israel’s intelligence service believed that Iran was “not performing the activity necessary to produce weapons”.

A secret cable obtained by Al Jazeera’s Investigative Unit reveals that Mossad sent a top-secret cable to South Africa on October 22, 2012 that laid out a “bottom line” assessment of Iran’s nuclear work.

It appears to contradict the picture painted by Netanyahu of Tehran racing towards acquisition of a nuclear bomb.

Writing that Iran had not begun the work needed to build any kind of nuclear weapon, the Mossad cable said the Islamic Republic’s scientists are “working to close gaps in areas that appear legitimate such as enrichment reactors”.

Such activities, however, “will reduce the time required to produce weapons from the time the instruction is actually given”.

That view tracks with the 2012 US National Intelligence estimate, which found no evidence that Iran had thus far taken a decision to use its nuclear infrastructure to build a weapon, or that it had revived efforts to research warhead design that the US said had been shelved in 2003.

Netanyahu plans to address the US Congress on March 3 and warn against the nuclear compromise currently being negotiated between Tehran and world powers.

Media reports and public comments by senior current and former officials have frequently indicated dissent from within Israel’s security services over Netanyahu’s alarmist messaging on Iran.

However, the document leaked to Al Jazeera makes clear that the Mossad’s formal assessment of Iran’s nuclear capacity and intentions differs from the scenario outlined by the prime minister at the UN.

The cable was relayed to South Africa’s State Security Agency (SSA) shortly after the September 2012 address in which Netanyahu had displayed a cartoonish diagram of a bomb with a fuse, marked with a 70 percent line and another “red line” at 90 percent.

The markers represented progress milestones in Iran’s uranium enrichment work. He argued that medium-enriched uranium (which Iran had begun producing, saying it was needed to fuel a research reactor producing isotopes to fight cancer) took Iran 70 percent of the distance to enriching weapons-grade material.

The Israeli prime minister told the UN General Assembly that “by next spring, by most at next summer at current enrichment rates [Iran] will have finished the medium enrichment and move on to the final stage,” in which he said they would enrich uranium to weapons grade.

‘Not the right way’

Earlier in 2012, former Mossad chief Meir Dagan had hinted at a disagreement with Netanyahu. In an interview in March, he warned of overstating the danger of Iran’s nuclear activities and of putting Israel on a path to war with Iran.

The spy chief said it would be a “stupid idea” to attack Iran before other options were considered. “An attack on Iran before you are exploring all other approaches is not the right way,” Dagan had said.

His comments would likely have been informed by his former agency’s analysis reflected in the document obtained by Al Jazeera.

It reveals that In October 2012, Israel’s foreign intelligence service estimated that Iran had 100 kilograms of uranium enriched to a level of 20 percent.

Iran expanded that stockpile over the following year, but then agreed to neutralise or destroy that material under an agreement with the US, Britain, China, Russia, France and Germany – the so-called P5+1 group.

Reports of discord between Netanyahu and the Mossad over Iran surfaced again last month amid reports – later denied – that the Israeli intelligence service had warned Washington that new US sanctions would sabotage nuclear negotiations between Iran and world powers.

Iran and the P5+1 are currently pursuing a framework pact for a permanent deal by the end of March, and a full technical agreement by the end of June. Iran insists its nuclear work is entirely for peaceful purposes; the premise of the nuclear deal currently being negotiated is to strengthen verifiable safeguards against weaponisation of nuclear material.

Leaked cables show Netanyahu’s Iran bomb claim contradicted by Mossad

Gulf between Israeli secret service and PM revealed in documents shared with the Guardian along with other secrets including CIA bids to contact Hamas

Seumas Milne, Ewen MacAskill and Clayton Swisher

The Guardian, Monday 23 February 2015 13.06 EST

http://www.theguardian.com/world/2015/feb/23/leaked-spy-cables-netanyahu-iran-bomb-mossad

Benjamin Netanyahu’s dramatic declaration to world leaders in 2012 that Iran was about a year away from making a nuclear bomb was contradicted by his own secret service, according to a top-secret Mossad document. [Link to the document further below—MJS].

It is part of a cache of hundreds of dossiers, files and cables from the world’s major intelligence services – one of the biggest spy leaks in recent times.

Brandishing a cartoon of a bomb with a red line to illustrate his point, the Israeli prime minister warned the UN in New York that Iran would be able to build nuclear weapons the following year and called for action to halt the process.

But in a secret report shared with South Africa a few weeks later, Israel’s intelligence agency concluded that Iran was “not performing the activity necessary to produce weapons”. The report highlights the gulf between the public claims and rhetoric of top Israeli politicians and the assessments of Israel’s military and intelligence establishment.

The disclosure comes as tensions between Israel and its staunchest ally, the US, have dramatically increased ahead of Netanyahu’s planned address to the US Congress on 3 March.

The White House fears the Israeli leader’s anticipated inflammatory rhetoric could damage sensitive negotiations between Tehran and the world’s six big powers over Iran’s nuclear programme. The deadline to agree on a framework is in late March, with the final settlement to come on 30 June. Netanyahu has vowed to block an agreement he claims would give Iran access to a nuclear weapons capability.

The US president, Barack Obama, will not meet Netanyahu during his visit, saying protocol precludes a meeting so close to next month’s general election in Israel.

The documents, almost all marked as confidential or top secret, span almost a decade of global intelligence traffic, from 2006 to December last year. It has been leaked to the al-Jazeera investigative unit and shared with the Guardian.

The papers include details of operations against al-Qaida, Islamic State and other terrorist organisations, but also the targeting of environmental activists.

The files reveal that:

  • The CIA attempted to establish contact with Hamas in spite of a US ban.
  • South Korean intelligence targeted the leader of Greenpeace.
  • Barack Obama “threatened” the Palestinian president to withdraw a bid for recognition of Palestine at the UN.
  • South African intelligence spied on Russia over a controversial $100m joint satellite deal.

The cache, which has been independently authenticated by the Guardian, mainly involves exchanges between South Africa’s intelligence agency and its counterparts around the world. It is not the entire volume of traffic but a selective leak.

One of the biggest hauls is from Mossad. But there are also documents from Russia’s FSB, which is responsible for counter-terrorism. Such leaks of Russian material are extremely rare.

Other spy agencies caught up in the trawl include those of the US, Britain, France, Jordan, the UAE, Oman and several African nations.

The scale of the leak, coming 20 months after US whistleblower Edward Snowden handed over tens of thousands of NSA and GCHQ documents to the Guardian, highlights the increasing inability of intelligence agencies to keep their secrets secure.

While the Snowden trove revealed the scale of technological surveillance, the latest spy cables deal with espionage at street level – known to the intelligence agencies as human intelligence, or “humint”. They include surveillance reports, inter-agency information trading, disinformation and backbiting, as well as evidence of infiltration, theft and blackmail.

The leaks show how Africa is becoming increasingly important for global espionage, with the US and other western states building up their presence on the continent and China expanding its economic influence. One serving intelligence officer told the Guardian: “South Africa is the El Dorado of espionage.”

Africa has also become caught up in the US, Israeli and British covert global campaigns to stem the spread of Iranian influence, tighten sanctions and block its nuclear programme.

The Mossad briefing about Iran’s nuclear programme in 2012 was in stark contrast to the alarmist tone set by Netanyahu, who has long presented the Iranian nuclear programme as an existential threat to Israel and a huge risk to world security. The Israeli prime minister told the UN: “By next spring, at most by next summer, at current enrichment rates, they will have finished the medium enrichment and move[d] on to the final stage. From there, it’s only a few months, possibly a few weeks before they get enough enriched uranium for the first bomb.”

He said his information was not based on secret information or military intelligence but International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) reports.

Behind the scenes, Mossad took a different view. In a report shared with South African spies on 22 October 2012 – but likely written earlier – it conceded that Iran was “working to close gaps in areas that appear legitimate, such as enrichment reactors, which will reduce the time required to produce weapons from the time the instruction is actually given”.

But the report also states that Iran “does not appear to be ready” to enrich uranium to the higher levels necessary for nuclear weapons. To build a bomb requires enrichment to 90%. Mossad estimated that Iran then had “about 100kg of material enriched to 20%” (which was later diluted or converted under the terms of the 2013 Geneva agreement). Iran has always said it is developing a nuclear programme for civilian energy purposes.

Last week, Netanyahu’s office repeated the claim that “Iran is closer than ever today to obtaining enriched material for a nuclear bomb” in a statement in response to an IAEA report.

A senior Israeli government official said there was no contradiction between Netanyahu’s statements on the Iranian nuclear threat and “the quotes in your story – allegedly from Israeli intelligence”. Both the prime minister and Mossad said Iran was enriching uranium in order to produce weapons, he added.

“Israel believes the proposed nuclear deal with Iran is a bad deal, for it enables the world’s foremost terror state to create capabilities to produce the elements necessary for a nuclear bomb,” he said.

However, Mossad had been at odds with Netanyahu on Iran before. The former Mossad chief Meir Dagan, who left office in December 2010, let it be known that he had opposed an order from Netanyahu to prepare a military attack on Iran.

Other members of Israel’s security establishment were riled by Netanyahu’s rhetoric on the Iranian nuclear threat and his advocacy of military confrontation. In April 2012, a former head of Shin Bet, Israel’s internal security agency, accused Netanyahu of “messianic” political leadership for pressing for military action, saying he and the then defence minister, Ehud Barak, were misleading the public on the Iran issue. Benny Gantz, the Israeli military chief of staff, said decisions on tackling Iran “must be made carefully, out of historic responsibility but without hysteria”.

There were also suspicions in Washington that Netanyahu was seeking to bounce Obama into taking a more hawkish line on Iran.

A few days before Netanyahu’s speech to the UN, the then US defence secretary, Leon Panetta, accused the Israeli prime minister of trying to force the US into a corner. “The fact is … presidents of the United States, prime ministers of Israel or any other country … don’t have, you know, a bunch of little red lines that determine their decisions,” he said.

“What they have are facts that are presented to them about what a country is up to, and then they weigh what kind of action is needed in order to deal with that situation. I mean, that’s the real world. Red lines are kind of political arguments that are used to try to put people in a corner.”

Link to the leaked Mossad document contrary to Netanyahu’s lies about Iranian nuclear development:

http://static.guim.co.uk/ni/1424713149380/Mossad-On-Iran-Nuclear-Stat.pdf

End the US Blockade of Cuba and Military Occupation of Guantanamo Bay! An Interview with Manolo De Los Santos
| February 26, 2015 | 9:15 pm | Cuba | Comments closed

http://blackagendareport.com/node/14688

End the US Blockade of Cuba and Military Occupation of Guantanamo Bay! An Interview with Manolo De Los Santos

Raul Castro decorates the Cuban Five
| February 26, 2015 | 9:06 pm | Cuba, Cuban Five | Comments closed

The Cuban Five received in the National Assembly
| February 26, 2015 | 8:51 pm | Cuba, Cuban Five | Comments closed

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mWbUTwjbbL0&feature=em-

Response to “Sanders Moves Into Top Tier Of The Chase”
| February 26, 2015 | 8:12 pm | Analysis, Bernie Sanders, National, political struggle | Comments closed
By A. Shaw
So, Sanders replaces O’Malley in the fourth slot, according to US News & World Reports.
Last May, O’Malley was fourth and Sanders tenth. Today it’s almost the exact reverse. But silly people still say O’Malley is more “viable” than Sanders.
Although Sanders has only 5%, he is “Clinton’s leading rival,”  according to US News & World Reports
Warren with 7% isn’t running. Biden with 15% is a clown or a buffoon who will hold on to his 15 points only as long as he makes people laugh. So, that leaves only Clinton with 48 points and Sanders with 5% in the top tier.
Momentum is building and it is with Sanders.
Sanders tactics are ” paying off with a portion of the hard left,”   according to US News & World Reports.
It’s interesting that Sanders doesn’t have all of the hard left, just a “portion” of it. What is the other portion doing? Evidently, the soft left is still begging Warren to run. But Warren doesn’t want to run.
Sanders, Rubio Move Into Top Tier of The Chase
| February 26, 2015 | 8:06 pm | Analysis, Bernie Sanders, National, political struggle | Comments closed

Chris Christie loses momentum, while Bernie Sanders becomes the prime alternative to Hillary Clinton.

By David Catanese    
Sanders Up, O’Malley Down

On the Democratic side, Sen. Bernie Sanders, I-Vt., replaces former Maryland Gov. Martin O’Malley in the fourth slot.
Sanders has been out making the most aggressive case for a progressive alternative to front-runner Hillary Clinton, and it’s paying off with a portion of the hard left. He’s only taking about 5 percent of the Democratic primary vote nationally, but that’s enough to “have a little bit of separation from the bottom tier that could make him Clinton’s leading rival,” according to Public Policy Polling.
Since he hails from neighboring Vermont, New Hampshire is where Sanders best performs – NBC/Marist tracked him at 13 percent there, when not including Massachusetts Sen. Elizabeth Warren, who has repeatedly said she’s not pursuing a 2016 campaign.
O’Malley, on the other hand, had less than 1 percent of support in the poll.
The former governor has been effectively frozen out by traditional donors, staff and interest groups waiting for a Clinton candidacy. That’s left him stalled in neutral for most of the last year.
Sanders, on the other hand, has been making a more direct appeal to the liberal heart of the party, if still shying away from taking on Clinton herself.
The independent has said he’ll announce a final decision on a 2016 campaign sometime in March.
Response to “People are really getting angry”: How Bernie Sanders just electrified Iowa
| February 26, 2015 | 7:59 pm | Analysis, Bernie Sanders, National, political struggle | Comments closed
By  A. Shaw
 “Bernie Sanders just electrified Iowa,”  the  article says.
 Yeah, and he’s going to electrify Iowa again and again until 2016
 “His issues are their issues, and if anything, they are more pissed off than he is,” the article says.
 In contrast, Clinton’s issues are her issues.  Clinton’s issues are another country to invade and occupy, more tax breaks for big corporations and less regulation of the crooks on Wall Street.

“Our government  is bought and paid for by the Koch brothers, and we are living in an oligarchy,”   Bernie Sanders says.
The State in the USA is a government of the Koches, by the Koches, and for the Koches. The GOP is the favorite brothel of the Koches. The DP is the second farvorite.
“We … better pay attention and get off our asses,” the Bernie Sanders warns.
We better get off ours asses before the Koches and other democracy-hating reactionaries kick the shit out of us.
In time, Bernie will electrify the USA.