Month: June, 2015
The Americans studying medicine in Cuba
| June 13, 2015 | 11:15 am | Cuba, Health Care | Comments closed

June 12, 2015Source: ProgesoWeekly

HAVANA, Cuba  After Hurricane Katrina devastated parts of Louisiana and Mississippi in August 2005, Cuba offered a cadre of doctors and medical supplies to help treat injured and displaced Americans. Cuba is renowned around the world for the quality of its doctors, but the United States government declined the offer.
Of course, that’s not exactly surprising given the two countries’ decades of animosity. Tension between Cuba and the U.S. is most visibly epitomized by a still-in-place trade embargo imposed by the U.S. in 1960, one year after Fidel Castro and Ernesto “Che” Guevara led a revolution to turn Cuba into a communist state.
Given the frosty relations and how the U.S. declined Cuban medical aid in 2005, one might reasonably assume the island just 90 miles south of Florida is the last place an American would go for medical school.
One would be wrong.
Lillian Burnett, who is from Oakland, is proof and she’s not alone.
But how does someone get from California to the Cuban capital en route to becoming a certified doctor?
It’s a story that involves Castro, an inspiring presentation back in the Bay Area, a personal desire to do good and a forward-thinking Cuban mission with an international outlook. It’s also a story that shines a light on the Escuela Latinoamericana de Medicina (ELAM), a program that trains doctors and helps patients worldwide, including in the U.S., even though few Americans are aware of its existence.

Inspiration from Honduras

Burnett graduated from UC Berkeley in 2005 with an eye on becoming a doctor. Soon after, Pastors for Peace, an interfaith organization that aims to help underserved populations, came to Laney College in Oakland to give a presentation about ELAM. An ELAM graduate named Luther Castillo spoke of his own experience in the program and told of the work he was doing back home in Honduras, serving his own Garifuna community, a Central American population of African descent.
“The Garifuna are very much a disenfranchised, oppressed, ostracized people in their countries and Luther was just this amazing young man who was doing amazing work,” Burnett recalled last month, sitting in her small one-bedroom apartment in Havana.

Hospital Salvador Allende in Havana where Burnett and her classmates study medicine. Hospital Salvador Allende in Havana where Burnett and her classmates study medicine.

Castillo talked about how he and other ELAM graduates had taken a method of medicine modeled after the Cuban system and applied it to his Garifuna community in Honduras. Small neighborhood clinics served and built relationships with collections of families in particular neighborhoods, where doctors functioned as community leaders as well as medical professionals.
The effect was something more intimate and holistic than the American health care system in which treatment can often feel hasty and impersonal.
“I saw that and was like, ‘Yup, that’s what I want to do,” Burnett says.
That’s the kind of doctor I want to be. I want to be groomed like that. Even if I can’t necessarily come back to the States and practice that way, let me have those values instilled in me as I’m learning this science.”
ELAM brings students from around the world to Cuba for a six-year program, taught in Spanish and covered by scholarships from the Cuban government. (For Americans, those scholarships are administered by the IFCO/Pastors for Peace partnership.)
Students have to make just one promise: After finishing the program, they’ll return home to work in underserved communities in their own home countries.
ELAM’s six-year program includes more than 10,000 students from more than 120 countries, according to MEDICC, a non-profit organization that works to facilitate cooperation in medical education between the U.S., Cuba and other countries. As of 2014, ELAM had graduated a total of 23,000 students from 83 countries in Africa, Asia and the Americas since its first class finished in 2005. American graduates, as of 2014 there were more than 100, along with about 100 current students from the U.S., are “overwhelmingly young people of color from low-income families, over half women,” according to MEDICC.
Gail Reed, MEDICC’s research director, says ELAM is the world’s largest medical school.
Sold on both Castillo’s story and ELAM as a whole, Burnett spent some time in the U.S. taking pre-med courses and saving money, then enrolled in the program and moved to Havana in 2011.
Her journey was just beginning.

Classmates and connections from all over

Burnett says one of her favorite aspects of ELAM is its emphasis on group responsibility beyond cultural lines. A typical group assignment could partner her with students from Lebanon, Pakistan, Mongolia, Ecuador and the Comoros, all of them working together in Spanish. In the eyes of their Cuban professors, success “or failure” is earned together, not as individuals.
“Say the kid from Pakistan and the kid from the Comoros are killing it, but the rest of us are struggling,” she says. “Professors aren’t going to let them get 5s and the rest of us get 2s and 3s. They’ll say, “How come you guys did well and your companeros are having a hard time? Shame on you. You need to help them out. You need to lift them up.”
But the benefits aren’t only educational.
That’s an excellent political diplomacy and international solidarity move, because you’re not going to be so quick to make someone an enemy,” Burnett says. “You have this mentality of, “Nah, man, I went through six years of medical school and some real stuff with my friend from Palestine right there. That’s the homie!”

“You have a responsibility in that, too”

Burnett is currently nearing the end of her fourth year in the program. The first two are spent mostly in the classroom learning hard sciences, the subsequent four doing hands-on clinical work. From day one, however, students get assigned to individual neighborhoods where they go door-to-door to take people’s temperatures, test blood pressure and inquire about people’s general well-being.
It’s not an intrusion to those residents, though, Burnett says, since they’re used to such a community-based healthcare model. Typically, a clinic called a consultorio will serve a given neighborhood; the doctor often lives above the clinic where he practices and gets to know local families well. Then a bigger clinic will offer more specific care for a collection of neighborhoods, with hospitals existing as a top-tier for last resort or in case of emergencies.
Aspects of that connected, social, community-based system are what Burnett and many of her fellow ELAM students hope to take back to their own countries after graduation.
“There’s a way of interacting with people and being present in the community that’s not just scientific or hard medicine,” she says. “I’d really like to practice in a community to help it mobilize around its own health.”
Burnett mentions her own hometown of Oakland.
“Cubans would say there’s a role the physician has to play around addressing gun violence in the community, around addressing addiction in the community, addressing police brutality in the community,” she continues. “Those are things people are dying from, even if there’s not a pill for them. You need to understand the impact that all those other social, political economic stressors have on someone developing an infectious disease or diabetes or hypertension in that atmosphere.
“There’s medicine in that, too. You have a responsibility in that, too.”
The False Identification of Anarchism with the Left
| June 12, 2015 | 10:29 am | Anarchism, political struggle | Comments closed
By A. Shaw
The basic principle of classical anarchism is do not engage in political struggle or, in other words, abstain from politics.
Neo-anarchism says if you must engage in political struggle, then, for God’s sake, you must campaign and vote for a  candidate or party that aims to lose.
Abstention from political struggle results in zero and support of a candidate who aims to lose results in zero.
The ancient law of identity says two different things that are identical to a third thing are identical to each other.
So, classical anarchism and neo-anarchism are identical to a third thing — namely, zero — so, classical anarchism and neo-anarchism are identical to each other.
The gist of classical anarchism is: If you can’t for some reason campaign and vote for a reactionary candidate, then, for God’s sake, don’t campaign and vote at all.
The gist of neo-anarchism is: If you can’t for some reason campaign and vote for a reactionary candidate, then, for God’s sake,  campaign and vote for somebody who aims to lose.
(1) Vote for the reactionary candidate and the result is reactionary 1 and revolutionary 0.
(2) Vote for the revolutionary candidate and the result is  reactionary 0 and revolutionary 1
(3) Vote for neither the reactionary nor revolutionary candidate and the result is reactionary 0 and revolutionary 0. This is a kind of nothingness or a zero.
(4) Vote for the candidate who aims to lose and the result is reactionary 0 and revolutionary 0, because losing is the ultimate nothingness or the ultimate zero.
.
So, the identity is between (3) and (4), above, or, in other words,  reactionary 0 and revolutionary 0 is the same thing as reactionary 0 and revolutionary 0.
Both classical anarchism and neo-anarchism see campaigning as a greater enemy or foe than voting.
The individual who votes results in only one vote under the rule of one person, one vote.
But the individual who knows how to campaign and who campaigns may result in only one or only one hundred votes or only one thousand votes, depending on his or her degree of skill and kind of skill in campaigning.
So, the campaigner is evil in the eyes of anarchists just as the anarchist is evil is the eyes of those who campaign.
The most extreme expression of anarchism is a dead dog anarchist. He or she is not only an anarchist, but he or she is also dead and a dog.
So, finally, the Left is not anarchism and should not be so identified.
The Left therefore is either A or B or C or anarchism. A or B or C or anarchism differs from anarchism.
Anarchism is by far the largest sector of bourgeois politics. There are more anarchists than all other political creatures combined.
From Germany, with hypocrisy
| June 7, 2015 | 9:38 pm | Germany, Palestinian struggle for equality, political struggle | Comments closed

by Emran Feroz

On Monday, Germany’s foreign minister Frank-Walter Steinmeier visited the Gaza Strip and “expressed harsh criticism”, as German media outlets put it, after witnessing the destruction of Israel’s last attack in summer 2014. “Life in Gaza is unbearable”, Steinmeier said, adding that the status quo is unsustainable. After hearing such news, one might think that this politician is a bold truth teller and critic of the occupation, a remarkable role for a German Secretary of State. But a closer look shows that Steinmeier has behaved with just as much hypocrisy as many other European politicians who support Israel without reservation. In fact, he may be an even greater enabler of apartheid than any of his peers.

The German foreign minister entered Gaza with the permission the Israeli government. His trip to Gaza was planned during his Israel visit, whose main purpose was to meet the new right-wing government. That Netanyahu’s coalition is the most extreme and openly pro-settler government in Israel’s history was completely ignored by Steinmeier. Netanyahu decided who Steinmeier was allowed to meet inside Gaza and whom he wasn’t. That meant zero meetings with anyone affiliated with the government of Gaza, which is controlled by Hamas. This practice is nothing new. Since Operation Protective Edge, in which more than 2.000 Palestinians have been killed, Western statesmen from Norway, Ireland and Spain, have visited the Gaza Strip on the Israeli condition that they would meet no one from Hamas. None protested the onerous, decidedly anti-diplomatic conditions imposed on them by Gaza’s occupier.

According to Steinmeier, Hamas is the main party to blame for the whole disaster consuming Gaza. For that reason, he demanded heightened security for Israel while demanding that Hamas stop firing rockets. Steinmeier conveyed the impression that both actors, Israel and occupied Gaza, are of equal strength and as responsible for the situation, while ignoring the hundreds of Israeli ceasefire violations over the past 9 months. As the massacre in Gaza unfolded, Steinmeier was one of those who publicly worried about people at Tel Aviv beach. During a meeting of foreign ministers at the end of July 2014, Steinmeier issued support for the Israeli aggression and pined about the empty beaches in Israel. In response, Turkey’s Ahmet Davutoglu became outraged and pointed out that in Gaza, the beaches were not empty but the streets were full of dead children.

It is relevant to note that many people were killed in Gaza by German weapons gifted to Israel at a deep discount as part of the overall package of German reparations for the Holocaust.

While in Gaza, Steinmeier even neglected to mention the Kilani family whose members were exterminated in an airstrike on a civilian home during Israel’s assault last summer.  Ibrahim Kilani and his family happened to be citizens of Germany. An engineer by trade, Ibrahim Kilani lived in Siegen for many years before he decided to return to Gaza. In fact, Kilani’s first wife and his other children still live in Germany. Until today, not a single representative of the German government has taken responsibly or issued a single statement of regret about this entire family of Germans wasted by a guided Israeli missile. “It seems that my family was outlawed”, is what Ramsis, Ibrahim’s son, told me.

German weapons kill Palestinians again and again, and the discounted weapons keep flowing into Israeli hands. Palestinians with German citizenship can be murdered in Gaza without any recourse. They are like ghosts who never existed. To even broach this topic in respectable German society is impossible and opens critics up to accusations of anti-Semitism and “Holocaust minimizing.” Calling the Gaza Strip what it is “the world’s biggest ghetto” is considered a “Holocaust comparison.” The same goes for those who talk about the apartheid. Intellectuals like Ilan Pappe or Noam Chomsky, who use this term regularly, would never be able to publish a piece in most of Germany’s daily or weekly newspapers.

It is true, as Steinmeier said, that the status quo must end. But in the reactionary political atmosphere that produced figures like him, the German government might be the last entity to support this goal.

INTO THE DEMOCRATIC FOLD OR INTO THE ANARCHIST FOLD
| June 5, 2015 | 9:20 pm | Analysis, Bernie Sanders, political struggle | Comments closed
By A. Shaw
Marx, Fidel, Engels, Ho, and Lenin all warned us that anarchism assumes many forms.
Here’s one of those forms.
“The sheepdog is a presidential candidate running ostensibly to the left of the establishment Democrat to whom the billionaires will award the nomination. Sheepdogs are herders, and the sheepdog candidate is charged with herding activists and voters back into the Democratic fold who might otherwise drift leftward and outside of the Democratic party, either staying home or trying to build something outside the two party box,”  Bruce A. Dixon, a running dog of imperialism, barks.
The content of Anarchism, present in all of its forms, is abstention from political struggle or other activity that equates with abstention.
SHEEPDOG AND RUNNING DOG
Using the same words, wit, erudition, and gestures, Bernie Sanders does today what he has done for 40 years.
Imperial running dog Bruce A. Dixon doesn’t clarify whether Bernie was a sheepdog during the last 40 years before he became a presidential candidate or whether Bernie during the last 40 years was left or only “ostensibly left.”
If Bernie was a sheepdog 40 years before he became a presidential candidate, then presumably his presidential candidacy has nothing to do with sheepdogging.
If Bernie wasn’t  a sheepdog 40 years before he became a presidential candidate, then  presumably his candidacy alone accounts for these false accusations of sheepdogging.
So what running dog Dixon is really saying is Bernie is an alleged sheepdog solely because Bernie is running against Hillary Clinton.
Thus, Dixon is a running dog of Hillary, a notorious U.S. imperialist.
INTO THE DEMOCRATIC FOLD OR INTO THE ANARCHIST FOLD
  
The running dog says, “the sheepdog candidate is charged with herding activists and voters back into the Democratic fold.”
Dixon, the running dog of imperialism, seems to understand that many liberals and leftists will never campaign or vote for Hillary Clinton. So, realizing he can’t get their vote or support, running dog urges these liberals and leftists not to vote at all or to vote for a candidate who aims to lose.
An example of a candidate who aims to lose is somebody running for a party that is not qualified to be on the presidential ballot in at least half of the states of the USA, thus, making it impossible to win in either popular vote or the votes of the electoral college.
Of all the third parties qualified to be on the presidential ballot somewhere, the Green Party is the most widely qualified.
The Green Party has qualified to be on the ballot in only 21 states and Washington DC.
Running dogs are everywhere today barking “Vote for the candidate who aims to lose.”.
This is anarchist trash.
Bernie however aims to win.
BUILD SOMETHING OUTSIDE THE TWO PARTY BOX
Why wait until a presidential election year to build something outside the two party box.
Get your party that’s outside the box qualified in most or all of the states before the presidential election year.
Stop telling lies and perpetrating electoral fraud of the electorate by saying that candidates who aim to lose and who must lose are winners or going to be winners.
Communists labor for agreement of democratic parties
| June 5, 2015 | 9:14 pm | Analysis, Frederick Engels, Karl Marx, Party Voices, political struggle | Comments closed
By A. Shaw
“Finally, they [that is, Communists] labour everywhere for the union and agreement of the democratic parties of all countries,” Marx and Engels wrote in the Communist Manifesto.
Hare brained elements of the U.S. left can not understand this principle of class struggle, even if their lives depended on it.
These hare brains transform the principle, cited above, into Communists labor for union and agreement with proletarian democratic parties of all countries or Communists labor for union and agreement with petty bourgeois democratic parties of all countries
This principle, as Marx and Engels formulated it, says Communists labor for union and agreement with  democratic parties of all countries.
Marx and Engels did not place class or nationality limitations on the principle. So, the principle applies to all democratic parties of all countries.
The hare brained element of the U.S. left argues that Marx and Engels did not intend that Communists labor for agreement between proletarian democratic parties and bourgeois democratic parties.
The FBI dominates the hare brained element of the U.S. left. The FBI imposes its 17th and 18th century bourgeois nonsense and foolishness, holding that democratic parties must not agree on anything.
In other words, the CP and DP today should never struggle for common goals if any common goals exist.
At any given political situation or moment, there may be 1000 or more issues outstanding among democratic parties.
For a union or agreement to exist, there must be common ground on at least 1 issue between 2 democratic parties.
The 2 parties need not agree on the other 999 issues. Such unions and agreements are often called “tactical alliances” which are essential in proletarian as well as bourgeois politics.
In accordance with FBI instructions, most hare brained leftists in the USA care only about intriguing and splitting their own party. To the hare brains, the political struggle is within the party, not against the bourgeoisie outside of the party.
Of course, one split is followed by another split, so on and so forth.
Thus, any idea of agreement between democratic parties, as the Communist  Manifesto advocates, seems insane or  brutish to hare brains.
Again, to hare brains, the only things that count are intrigue and splits.
Clearly, at least 10,000 people attended the May 26 rally.
| June 2, 2015 | 8:02 pm | Bernie Sanders, political struggle | 1 Comment
By A. Shaw
Previous pictures of Bernie Sanders’ May 26th rally in Burlington, VT published on this website showed the rally from behind the stage out to the far edge of part of the audience. This picture, below, shows the rally from the far edge of most of the audience in front of the stage.
Clearly, the picture below, shows at least 10,000 people attended the rally.
If bourgeois media had reported that Bernie Sanders attracted over 10,000 people at his rally, he would have soared ten points in the polls. Hillary would have dropped ten points.
Bourgeois media protects Hillary. It minimizes, trivializes, and marginalizes developments that seem detrimental to her campaign.
Evidently, Hillary and her campaign intimidate the media by threatening to accuse the media of gender bias. Aggressive members of Hillary’s staff routinely maintain to the media that Hillary wouldn’t have lost in 2008 but for gender bias of the media
Hillary and her campaign have already leaked a 40-year old piece of fiction written by a young Bernie to implicate Bernie in gender bigotry.
Hillary leads in the polls, fundraising, name recognition, and big shot endorsements.
But the spectacular turnouts at Bennie’s events across the country show that he leads in voter or supporter contact which produces these good turnouts.
The bourgeois media or, better still, the lying cappie press or still better, Wall Street propaganda can’t save Hillary now any more than it could save her in 2008.
Bernie Sanders on Hillary Clinton: 'Would she be interested in being my vice president?'
Aim to win or to lose or to run
| June 1, 2015 | 8:48 pm | About the CPUSA, Party Voices, political struggle | Comments closed

By A. Shaw

Parties aim to win or to lose or merely to run.
It’s important to ask what kind of party we’re dealing with.
Clearly, GOP and DP, the two old bourgeois parties, aim to win.
A party that aims to lose is obviously a crackpot party or anarchist.
A party that aims to run for the sake of running pretends to be the media, not a party.
In 1988, the late Gus Hall wrote “In every case the party should focus on offices it aims to win — if not in 1988, then over the course of the next few elections.”
The quote above refers to both the selection of offices to be contested as well as the selection of strategies and tactics to be used in the contest for offices.
The quote suggests if we have no chance to win, then don’t aim for the office, but if we have a chance, then go for it. Obviously, a party that aims to lose will despise this suggestion because it sees losing as a worthy and desirable outcome.
The quote further suggests that if certain strategies and tactics result in losing “over the course of the next few elections” then try other strategies and tactics.
To parties and candidates who aim to lose, these two suggestions seem to be utter nonsense.
Note that Gus Hall believed these suggestions apply “in every case.”